How does the world work? How would you and every other person fit into this complex universe? The reactions to these questions impact our viewpoint and the structure of our way of thinking of life.
Pierre Hadot writes in Philosophy as a Way of Life, "Philosophy develops and changes routine insight, compelling us to become mindful that we are seeing the world, and that the world is what we see."
If we understand it, the greater part of us have a way of thinking of life. We have viewpoints on how the world functions and standards (or morals) we endeavor to follow. These discernments and convictions either intentionally or unknowingly shape how we see and live on the planet.
In Meditations, Marcus Aurelius features this point, "If an individual has the experience and a more profound knowledge into the cycles of the universe, there will barely be a wonder that doesn't appear to him, in any event in certain perspectives, as lovely."
This piece centers around one part of a way of thinking of life — the principal points of view. I'm utilizing the term point of view as a comprehension of how the world functions. Webster's word reference characterizes viewpoint as "the ability to see things in their actual connection or pertinent significance."
Hadot clarifies a Catch 22 of the human condition: man lives on the planet without seeing the world.
Is this genuine today, with the entirety of our trend setting innovation and satellites? Provided that this is true, then, at that point how would we see the world?
View from Above
The Earth is a little stage in an astronomical field. — Carl Sagan
As per Hadot, there is an origination of enormous flight or view from above in each philosophical school as the most ideal approach to take a gander at things. The Platonists, Epicureans, and Stoics all found an "activity of creative mind through the boundless vastnesses of the universe." In book 7 of Meditations, Marcus expresses, "Watch and consider the to be of the stars as though you were running close by them, and constantly abide to you upon the progressions of the components into each other; for these minds wash away the revoltingness on the Earth. At the point when you are thinking about humankind, view natural things underneath as though from a vantage point above them."
It's surprising that almost 2,000 years prior, before any of our advanced innovation, so numerous sages would utilize the language "vast flight" or "running with the stars." Even today, the view from above expects creative mind to segregate from the world while being grounded in it.
Seneca proposes this activity of creative mind in Natural Questions; peering down from the statures of the sky, the scholar gets mindful of the tininess of the Earth and the ludicrousness of battles over small stretches of an area.
Hadot shows the view from above permits us to think about the entire of human reality, in the entirety of its social, geological, and passionate viewpoints, as a mysterious and amassing mass. This viewpoint empowers the Stoic to perceive what doesn't rely upon us — "wellbeing, acclaim, riches, and even passing is decreased to its actual measurements when considered starting here of view."
"The sage never stops to have the entire continually present to his psyche," Hadot composes, he always remembers the world yet thinks and acts with a view to the universe.
Marcus Aurelius composed this notable tribute to the universe,
All that is on top of you, O universe, is on top of me.
It's not just the Stoics who makes this request, the stargazer Carl Sagan urges us in Pale Blue Dot to "take a gander at that dab:"
From this far off vantage point, the Earth probably won't appear quite compelling. Be that as it may, as far as we might be concerned, it's unique. Rethink that dab. That is here, that is home, that is us. On it everybody you love, everybody you know, everybody you at any point knew about, each individual who at any point was, experienced their lives.
Think about the view from a higher place; how should it help you to see things in their appropriate connection and significant significance? Albeit the "infinite flight" expands our viewpoint, we should always remember that everything, including ourselves, is continually evolving.
Impermanence
All that's predetermination is to change, to be changed, to die. So new things can be conceived. — Marcus Aurelius .
The pre-Socratic logician Heraclitus assumed a huge part in forming the Stoic comprehension of how the world functions. As Heraclitus put it, "Nobody at any point steps in a similar stream twice, for it isn't a similar waterway, and they are not a similar individual." The illustration gives a reasonable viewpoint of the consistent condition of progress known to man, regularly alluded to as fleetingness.
Also, Marcus composed,
Time is a stream of occasions and its current is solid: no sooner accomplishes something hurl into see than it's cleared away.
In book 4, Marcus states, "Consistently recall Heraclitus' words: 'The passing of earth is the introduction of water, the demise of water is the introduction of air, the passing of air is fire' and the equivalent the opposite way." We should recollect where our way is driving; following our own inclination and widespread nature are a similar way. Continuously run the short street, and the short street is as per nature. The Stoic point of view lines up with the well known fact that everything kicks the bucket. "You could leave life at the present time," Marcus expresses, "let that figure out what you do, say, and think."
Accepting fleetingness and the steady condition of progress on the planet drives the Stoic to meet the day with new eyes. As Seneca keeps in touch with Lucilius,
Concerning me, I as a rule invest a lot of energy in the examination of insight. I take a gander at the world with a similar shock I regularly feel I am seeing it interestingly.
Hadot proposes the Seneca model uncovers how getting aware of the change happens in his insight, and the Sage "sees the world with new eyes."
The thought of seeing interestingly upholds the expressions of Heraclitus: "it isn't a similar waterway, and they are not a similar individual." Seeing the world with new eyes could be what Socrates implied by "intelligence starts in wonder."
How does the steady transition shape how you see the world?
For Marcus, it probably impacted him to compose:
At the point when you emerge in the first part of the day, reflect what a valuable advantage it is to be alive — to inhale, to think, to appreciate, to cherish.
I like the quotes you have mentioned, first time I have heard about Stoicism in YouTube. this was the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bguEiUgDA4