Just some random thoughts.

(Just another thought of mine.)

In all kinds of viewing perspective.

A reader beats all of them.

Why?

Why does a reader know all of them?

Is it because they experienced it themselves?

Is it because the author deliberately let the readers know?

Have you heard of this saying?

A chess involve two participants. Battling each other.

And yet, a third party individual looks at their board. And can know and see more clearly than them.

Why is that?

We can refer the third party as the reader.

The black particpant as the author.

The white participant as the protagonist.

What do you learn? And see?

The reader encompasses all the author wrote and what the protagonist experienced.

But the author can't, as they created it. Leading to fixed plot as they progresses.

The protagonist even more as the author already laid down his path to his beginning and to the end of his story.

Now, why can the reader take all of it and still add some ideas or create more?

And why can't the author do so?

Reader. If you think about the word reader.

What comes into your mind?

Read. From the word itself. We read. Read the words and story that the author has wrote.

Now what is the meaning of read?

Is it to understand?

Recognize?

Comprehend?

Decipher?

Grasp?

Perceive?

Discern?

Or is it all of them?

A reader embraces all the experience the protagonist do.

And they also embraces other protagonist experiences.

They combine it. The fuse it.

Until they get and see what others see. And what he sees.

A readers strength is that he knows and what situations and put it into practice.

A reader is one that wraps all the other stories he reads. And apply it into others. He enfold and to enwrap the stories in his mind. Gaining a clear picture of what the story goes next.

A reader is one who can tell the situation more clearly.

A reader is one who can predict.

A reader is something that is of a God's perspective.

A reader. Is just someone who enjoys reading.