Voluntaryism

Voluntaryism does not have to involve itself at all (if it does not want to) with so-called “morals.”

The right and wrong it describes are — in the strictly empirical sense — only the kind of "right" and "wrong" involved with mathematical equations.

The observable and testable crux is this: If minimized violent conflict in society is held as a value, a universal property norm based on self-ownership is necessary.

No “extra rights,” for cops, priests, or politicians. These are shown in practice to potentiate conflict and thus violent conflict, as arbitrarily granted — and violently claimed — separate foundational rights for different "classes" of human individuals are almost always perceived as unfair by one "class" or another.

Voluntaryism is a subtraction, *not* an addition.

A recognition of reality, *not* a “belief system.”

It seeks align itself as closely with objective reality as possible while holding peace as the value being sought, to the end of minimizing violent conflict in a given society.

You objectively cannot minimize violent conflict without a universal grundnorm for property. Daily interactions prove it. History proves it. You can test it yourself and prove it.

Here’s an explanation of the basics in English and Japanese.