In this article, I will contend that technology doesn't guarantee progress. The principal fundamental idea that should be explained is 'technology'. This paper recognizes the idea of 'technology' just like the utilization of science, particularly to modern or business targets. The other key idea 'progress' in this exposition is characterized as a consistent improvement, as the general public or development. I am contending that the idea of technology doesn't guarantee the idea of progress because there are sure advancements that have harmed society in different manners.
Researchers have made different advancements for different reasons. It is apparent that not these innovations are for the consistent improvement of the near public or progress, but instead for individual addition. On the off chance that specific technology was created to give a more noteworthy yield of harvest, yet this specific technology prompts the demise of an environment, at that point it isn't progressing in the sense it carries consistent improvement to the general public or development since it devastates the fragile equilibrium of life and its biodiversity.
The deficiency of biodiversity will hurt human advancement over the long haul because the establishments of life rely upon it.
A few people may feel that specific innovations are the right way for mankind, however, certain advances can show into things that individuals don't expect and hurt society thusly. For example, if researchers could anticipate that outsiders would assume control over the earth if they created a spaceship that could contact them, even though the researchers had not moved toward discovering earth intruders; they would have suspected something.
This is an extraordinary model that has not occurred, however, the introduction of nuclear energy is an illustration of technology that is proposed motivation behind giving houses and ventures power showed itself into a bomb for the military. Some may contend that the nuclear bomb guaranteed progress for the American's and partnered powers, yet most likely the Japanese society where the bomb was dropped during the Second World War didn't discover progress with this technology since it killed numerous blameless individuals and obliterated framework.
Certain advances are genuinely decimating the characteristic world. This, at last, doesn't prompt the improvement of progress, yet rather is causing it hurt. If technology continues producing unsafe gases and harmful synthetics which harm the earth, at that point it is of nothing but bad to development since people need to earth to endure.
A few perusers may protest me noting that "technology doesn't guarantee progress". Maybe they accept if not for technology people may never have prevailed with regards to being a predominant player on earth and we couldn't have ever developed enough to try and pose the inquiry in any case. Some creatures are more grounded, greater, and quicker than people and outer components that can slaughter people quietly, so by people utilizing technology to assemble cautious systems or asylum for the warmth it has guaranteed human endurance in a world that can be unforgiving by normal things. On the off chance that my idea of technology continued as before (the use of science, particularly mechanical or business), yet the idea of progress changed to (improvement or development) at that point one could answer 'yes' to the inquiry; "does technology guarantee progress".
This is clear in the assembling area of our general public where technology has empowered people to construct processing plants and stockrooms to guarantee improvement and development of financial matters. The equivalent could be said by keeping the idea of technology steady, yet changing the meaning of progress to (development, as towards an objective). Researcher's development to make technology can be persuaded by accomplishing objectives. For example, a specific item must be available by a particular due date, in any case, the venture will be ended, so by researchers utilizing technology and guaranteeing they take care of business they have pushed ahead and arrived at an objective.
There are specific innovations that can assist people with building a superior society by keeping us warm and guaranteeing food to endure. In any case, certain innovations have shown through the development of man that have undeniably uninsured the advancement of people since it has carried damage to progress through pulverization and passing. Maybe researchers and the overall population need to take some real time to contemplate designing certain advances. This is even more troublesome because no one can foresee the future and certain advancements may appear to be an extraordinary thought at that point, yet end up being a genuine peril to all life on earth. This paper in no way, shape, or form is a marker of which innovations are useful for the advancement of society, yet ideally, it will open the discourse between individuals to pose the inquiry; which technology is guaranteeing progress?