AI Chat GPT vs. Human 001

Welcome to MMAP Magazine’s Artificial Intelligence Chat-GPT vs. Human writing experiment. The editor’s thought it would be a fun idea to pull select past articles and turn them over to Chat-GPT for reworking. Our goal is to assess if the reader’s of MMAP Magazine will notice the difference in human vs AI writing. Will AI beat human creativity when it comes to article writing? Well we are about to find out. This is the first of the 50 article comparison. We would love to hear from you in the comments. The feedback you give will likely change the future on how our publication writes articles and presents them to our reader’s.

Article: 001
A.I. Chat GPT

“Cautionary Note: Worldcoin by Sam Altman, Retinal Eye Scanning”

From the pages of a dystopian novel, Worldcoin’s creators propose a retina scan. Why? Every article pushes the idea of it being for the “Greater Good.” But here’s the rub — this is a cover-up for something far more sinister. Worldcoin’s project feels like a page torn out of Steven Spielberg’s Minority Report, written by Philip K. Dick. When a company garners support for such a surveillance initiative, it’s undeniably alarming, establishing a global precedent for tracking people. Picture a world where you’re constantly watched and controlled by big tech empowered by AI and tied directly into government oversight. The Worldcoin project, wittingly or unwittingly, allows unprecedented control and surveillance over every individual. Once this retina scanning is fully functional, human freedom is compromised. A project of such magnitude will never bring any good to the world. The creators of such a project must fully understand the implications, knowing it will only lead to total tyranny.

Introducing a crypto project that converts retinal scans into unique digital numbers is foolhardy. Fingerprints are unique but can be falsified. However, human irises can’t be falsified or easily changed. In Minority Report, Tom Cruise’s character undergoes eye surgery to avoid tracking in a surveillance system similar to Worldcoin’s. Warning people to steer clear of Worldcoin isn’t enough. A robust warning to run away from this trap should be plastered across every news outlet. Articles about this coin reek of greed incitement and double speak. Anything digital or otherwise can be used for nefarious purposes, including cryptos, banks, and governments. So, trusting someone to scan a part of your body for “fraud protection” is illogical. Those who claim to safeguard against fraud often have the means to perpetrate the same.

KYCs, like Know Your Customer data collection, are potentially detrimental to crypto users. They prevent individuals from controlling their own accounts. KYC data can easily be used by governments to suppress dissent. Retina scanning using fear-based language isn’t a solution; governments have often claimed to safeguard the public while infringing on their liberties.

Worldcoin’s founders, Sam Altman and Alex Blania, use fear-based tactics, pretending it’s for safety. No articles highlight the dangers of the technology intended to protect people. Altman, Blania, and their supporting companies fully understand the intrusiveness of this technology, which is Orwellian at its core. The men promoting the Orb project might have darker intentions than they reveal. These individuals represent the kind of people whose true motives remain hidden behind a façade of goodwill. The name “Worldcoin” evokes feelings of global healing and world peace, but the Orb project is merely a ploy to leverage greed and control over the populous. Worldcoin cleverly taps into people’s avarice, offering “Free” coins with just a retinal scan. It’s a deceptive tactic; freedom has never been free, and handing it over for a few coins is a steep price.

Notably, Worldcoin started in second and third world countries — a strategic move given the population’s susceptibility to such a project due to economic constraints, lack of education, and naivety. Such an initiative wasn’t kicked off in America due to the likelihood of resistance against tyranny. It’s a pushback against intrusion. However, this doesn’t negate the potential future presence of scanning Orbs across American cities.

In conclusion, gaining temporary financial rewards at the cost of freedom is never worthwhile. Satoshi Nakamoto’s blockchain invention was never intended to be handed back to authority using fear or trickery. Your life is yours, not to be managed by another entity. Worldcoin’s retina scanning Orb is dystopian and authoritarian by nature and should be avoided at all costs.

Human
Article by: Michaelson Williams
Originally published on MMAP Magazine

MMAP Magazine in paperback

This article is sponsored by Products2ez.com