I’ve come to understand that the word Bayani have different definition from time to time. The word Bayani today describes our OFW’s who sacrifices a lot for their families, they contribute to a nation in a global world. They help with the economic status in the Philippines they help the government in pulling up the the country’s economic status with the overall dollar reserve. Meanwhile, during the precolonial the word bayani is only given to those who have protected the their people from enemies or potential danger. They are the one’s with oozing courage to protect. There are also different cultures to be called a bayani and this only goes to show that our concept of kabayanihan and bayani do shift and evolve.
We can peruse various perspectives and sentiments about bayani and kabaynihan with regards to Philippine History and Society. Perusing it made me acknowledge more that the word bayani truly has a tremendous variety regarding meaning because of individuals making a significance on it dependent on as far as they can tell for themselves. As such, the perspectives and assessments are 'not comparable'. They have unmistakable suggestion. How about we take Rizal for instance, a few says that he shouldn't be called the National Hero or picked to endure the title. They totally differ to it. Be that as it may, there are likewise individuals (the greater part of them are critical individuals), who concur with Rizal being hailed as "Pambansang Bayani". Since what will be will be for themselves, it is the way they see it. They are persuaded and sure that Rizal truly merits the title. Isn't it obvious? Perspectives and suppositions can be a lot of unalike about the bayani what's more, kabayanihan with regards to Philippine History and Society.
