Belgian doctors and relatives of Belgian health professionals have written an open letter to WHO. In it they write that they call for a World Health Organization examination. The organization launched an “infodemi” that turned Covid-19 into a “pandemic” in the first place.
This open letter is a historical document. It clearly and unambiguously points out all the important points and provides sources. This open letter to the WHO could become a “game changer” as doctors and health workers from other countries join it as well. By Nicki Vogt
Here are excerpts from the letter:
We, the Belgian doctors and health professionals, hereby express our serious concern over the development of the situation in recent months in connection with the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We urge politicians to be independent and informed in the decision-making process and the mandatory implementation of coronavirus measures (coronavirus closure is "the greatest violation of civil liberties since slavery" - "we will wear a mask by the end of 2021"). Current global measures to combat SARS-CoV-2 violate this view of health and human rights to a high degree. Activities include mandatory wearing of a mask (as well as outdoors and during sporting activities and in some communities, even if other people are not near them), physical distance, social isolation, mandatory quarantine for some groups, and hygiene measures (German Corona Crazy). about Belgium abolishes the mask - private parties in Germany only with permission).
Predicted pandemic with millions of deaths
At the beginning of the pandemic, the measures were understandable and widely supported, even if there were differences in implementation in the countries around us. The WHO initially predicted a pandemic that would cause 3.4% or millions of deaths. And a very contagious virus for which there was no cure or vaccine.
Facts about Covid-19
Gradually the alarm sounded from many sources: the objective evidence showed a completely different reality.
The Kovid-19 process followed the normal wave of infections similar to the flu season. As every year, we see tracking of influenza viruses: first rhinoviruses, then influenza A and B viruses, then coronaviruses. Nothing more than what we usually see (Sweden never had a closed mandate or mask before the coronavirus was broken)
The use of a non-specific PCR test, which yielded many false-positive results, showed an exponential picture. This test was performed using an emergency procedure and never tested itself seriously. The creator has specifically warned that this test is not intended for diagnosis but for research.
(...) The test does not measure how many viruses are present in the sample. Actual viral infection means the presence of viruses, the so-called viral load. If someone passes a positive test, it does not mean that the person is actually clinically infected or sick or ill. Koch's postulate has not been fulfilled. (...) Since a positive PCR test does not automatically indicate infection or active infection, this does not justify social measures taken solely on the basis of these tests.
Commandant
If we compare the wave of infections in countries that have a strict ban policy with countries where no bans have been imposed (compared to Sweden, Iceland ...), we see such distortions. Thus, there is no correlation between fine closure and the course of infection. The lockout did not result in a low death rate (Operation Military: Was the truth about Corona deliberately hidden from the public? Is the show banned?).
If we look at the implementation date of the locks, we see that the locks were installed after passing the peak and decreasing cases. Therefore, the reduction was not the result of the measures taken. [...]
Our immune system
For thousands of years, the human body has been exposed to moisture and droplets containing infectious microorganisms (viruses, bacteria and fungi) every day (the coronary dictatorship is here and no one wants to admit it).
The entry of these microorganisms is prevented by a highly developed mechanism - the immune system. A strong immune system relies on the normal daily effects of these microbes. Excessive hygiene measures damage our immunity. Only people with weak or weakened immune systems should be protected by extensive hygiene or social distance.
(...) Therefore, most people already have innate or cross immunity because they have already been exposed to variants of a virus.
The impact of social segregation on physical and mental health
Social isolation and economic damage led to an increase in depression, anxiety, suicide, domestic violence, and child abuse.
Studies have shown that the more social and emotional commitments they have, the more resistant they are to viruses. Isolation and quarantine are potentially fatal.
A highly contagious virus with millions of deaths without treatment?
Mortality was several times lower than expected and was close to that of seasonal influenza (0.2%).
Therefore, the number of registered coronary deaths is still overestimated (the anti-RKI order due to misleading data - the CDC drastically corrects coronary death numbers).
There is a difference between coronary death and coronary death. Humans are often carriers of several viruses and potentially pathogenic bacteria. Given that the majority of people who experienced acute symptoms had additional pathology, it is simply not possible to conclude that coronary infection was the cause of death. This is no longer taken into account in statistics.
Vulnerable groups can be clearly identified. Most of the patients who died were 80 years of age or older. The majority (70%) of the deaths, younger than 70 years, had major illnesses such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic lung disease or obesity. The vast majority of patients (> 98%) did not become ill or did not recover spontaneously.
There is now an affordable, safe, and effective therapy available for those who show severe symptoms. These are HCQ (hydroxychloroquine), zinc and AZT (azithromycin). Prompt application of this therapy leads to recovery and often prevents bed rest. Now it is hard for anyone to die.
This effective therapy has been proven with significant results by the clinical experience of colleagues in the field. This is in contrast to the theoretical critique (insufficient validity through blind study), which in some countries (e.g., the Netherlands) has even led to a ban on this therapy. A meta-analysis in The Lancet that did not prove any effect of HCQ was withdrawn. The sources of primary information used were considered reliable, and 3 out of 2 authors had conflicting interests.
We have serious questions about this.
In the United States, a group of local doctors who see patients every day set up Frontline America doctors and held a press conference that was watched by millions.
French professor Didier Raul of the Marseille Institute of Infectious Diseases (IHU) also offered this promising combination therapy in April. Dutch general practitioner Rob Ellens, who in his practice has treated many patients with HCQ and psychiatry, urged his colleagues to speak out about the freedom of therapy.
The final evidence comes from an epidemiological follow-up in Switzerland: mortality rates compared with and without this therapy.
From the stressful media images of ARDS (acute respiratory syndrome) in which people suffocated and suffered artificially, we now know that this was the result of an exaggerated reaction with coagulation within the pulmonary arteries. The administration of blood thinners and dexamethasone, as well as the prevention of artificial respiration, which additionally damages the lung tissues, means that this terrible problem is practically no longer fatal.
Therefore, it is not a virus but an easily treatable disease
Spread
The spread occurs through droplet infection (only in patients who cough or sneeze) and aerosols in closed and ventilated rooms. Therefore, pollution outside the building is impossible. Contact and epidemiological studies have shown that healthy people (or asymptomatic carriers who have a positive test) are virtually unable to transmit the virus. Therefore, healthy people do not endanger each other.
Transfers through objects (e.g., money, purchases, or shopping carts) have not been scientifically proven.
All of this poses a serious threat to the entire social removal policy and mandatory mouth masks for healthy people - there is no scientific basis for this.
mask
Oral masks are used in situations where there is contact with a proven risk group or people with upper respiratory problems and in a medical setting / in a hospital nursing home. They reduce the risk of coughing and sneezing from coughing and sneezing. Oral masks are ineffective in healthy individuals against the spread of viral infections.
Wearing a mask also has no negative effects. Oxygen deficiency (headache, nausea, fatigue, loss of concentration) occurs relatively quickly, and this effect is similar to altitude sickness. Every day patients complain of headaches, sinus problems, breathing problems and hyperventilation due to masks. In addition, the accumulated CO2 leads to toxic acidity of the body, which affects our immunity. Some experts even warn of the increased transmission of the virus in case of improper use of the mask.
Our Labor Code (Code 6) refers to CO2 (workplace ventilation) 900 ppm, in special cases a maximum of 1200 ppm. After a minute of wearing the mask, this level of toxicity is greatly increased to readings that are three to four times higher than these maximum readings. Therefore, anyone wearing a mask is poorly ventilated in the room
Therefore, the illegal use of masks is not recommended without a case of thorough examination of cardiovascular medicine by well-known occupational safety specialists.
Hospitals have a dry environment in their operating rooms where staff wear masks and precisely regulate humidity / temperature with a controlled flow of oxygen to compensate for this action and thus maintain strict safety standards (Epidemic Pretext: Corona-Pandemic is a game for is the creation of the "New World Order")
The second corona wave?
A second wave is currently being considered in Belgium, which will intensify these measures. However, a closer examination of the Ciensano figures (latest report from 3 September 2020) shows that while the number of infections has increased since mid-July, the number of admissions or deaths of patients has not increased at this time. So this is not the second wave of the corona, but the so-called “case chemistry” (note from me: This means fabricated and hidden evidence) due to the increasing number of tests.
The number of hospitalizations or deaths has dropped dramatically in the last few weeks, but when interpreting we have to take into account the recent heat. Moreover, most of the victims are still in the population over the age of 75.
This suggests that the level of action taken against the workforce and youth is not commensurate with the intended goals.
The vast majority of "infected" people who pass a positive test belong to the active age group, which has limited or limited symptoms due to the good functioning of the immune system (the Austrian Medical Association warns of "coronary panic" - second wave, but " laboratory tsunami ") - A neurologist criticizes the requirements of the mask and the rules of distance:" Inhuman and criminal ").
So nothing has changed - the summit is over.
So nothing has changed - the summit is over.
(...)