I think the intensity of an arbitrator is a lot on read.cash in view of the accompanying:
I can not add a remark to an article of a companion who has presented that article to a network that has me prohibited.
Yet, the proprietor of that article values my remark and he ought to be in charge of the substance on his article page, not some arbitrator of an outsider network.
An article represents itself and is possessed by the writer and it is just second in need that it can likewise get some greater perceivability by presenting that article to a proper network.
read.cash is empowering mediators to play tyrants here, I believe that ought to be fixed ASAP so everybody can openly network with who they need to speak with.
The mediator of a network can essentially undermine a client he doesn't care for, regardless of whether that individual is regarded by the proprietor of that article!