Contract

Contract: Would you kill someone for a million dollars?

This question is quite interesting and aims to pose a scenario where we decide on someone else's life. But to make it more morally convincing, I will leave certain considerations for the sake of making a decision that could change your life forever.

But first, let's think a little. Do we get to decide who lives and who dies? Do we have that right? What would be the repercussions of making that decision, apart from receiving a million dollars in cash? Here are the conditions for making such a decision.

There will be no retaliation of any kind or any problems with the law, the person remains unpunished. As long as they follow the established parameters, the hired person will receive his money, and he is free to use it as he wishes. He/she remains anonymous.

You can choose between a man or a woman.

There are no major complications here. It is about being inclusive, and here we are not discriminating against any gender, so extending this decision to men or women would leave the balance much more balanced.

The terminally ill, the elderly, and children, are excluded.

Under this point, the perfect candidate should be someone who does not meet any of the characteristics shown in the title. For obvious reasons, children are excluded from this, so only someone over 18 could be included. The elderly, on the other hand is a ticking time bomb because when you are of a certain age, you never know. Finally, a terminally ill person is not included because in theory, nature is already taking care of that, and if that sick person is in agony, they wouldn't mind losing their life.

You must pass a psychological test.

Interesting point, because if you agree, you would awaken a part of you you may not have known about. However, you must undergo a psychological test to prove that you do not have a mental condition that could alter your view of the world. No disorder is allowed.

You must not have a criminal record.

Except for a traffic ticket, everything else voids the deal. If you already have a history of violence of any kind, homicide, have been in jail for a crime, you are totally excluded from this deal. You would avoid people prone to use violence.

Finally, you must choose a good person or a bad person.

For this you will take into consideration "good" or "bad", the parameters used above, if the person you decide to kill for 1 million dollars is considered "good" certain conditions apply.

If the person is good:

-He/she cannot die painfully. The only thing accepted is a painless death:

-The maximum time limit of 4 days.

-No firearms or sharp objects may be used.

-The person will not be informed that his or her life will be taken, so certain anonymity will be guaranteed.

-There is a possibility that the hired person will not be the one who executes the murder, but it is only possible if the chosen person is aware of the situation, and in a certain way, accepts his or her destiny.

If the person is considered "bad" (murderers, pedophiles, rapists) the following will be hidden:

-Maximum term of 3 days.

-Can die with any object or firearm.

-Any type of violence is allowed.

-If requested, the hired person may have access to any type of weapon required to accomplish his task.

-As a special condition, the hunted will be informed of the situation, but will not be provided with any protection or weaponry that would help him to escape unharmed.

-Finally, the hired person may not kill the chosen person, as long as he abducts him, and within 48 hours, no one notices his absence. After the deadline, the person will be tortured to death, and the hired person must watch carefully, otherwise, all contracts are void.

Knowing all this, do you accept it? would you kill someone for a million dollars? To overlook the moral, for the economic... interesting question.

Lead image here