One of the best ways to share the beauty and wonder of the natural world with others is through nature photography. For those of us who do not have the time or ability to enjoy the beauty spread between nature and nature, a piece of nature is a travel story. An obvious quality of this art is creating awareness and empathy among us about special landscapes and species conservation, we decide what we should or shouldn't do to protect nature and species. - Nature may be trampled underfoot, animals may be frightened. The older the history of photography, the older the use of photography as a tool to preserve nature and wildlife. The photographs taken by William Henry Jackson during his travels and surveys with Hayden Expedition in the American Western Studies in the 180's, later in 182, prompted the US Congress to declare Yellowstone a national park and declare it a national park. Plays a major role in the global movement. A century later, Ansel Adams took that torch further, capturing the beauty of America's wild west in front of millions of eyes. Upon arrival, I can safely enjoy their majestic and enchanting beauty. But many also think that there is a dark side to capturing wildlife photographs. In the autumn issue of DoubleTech Magazine, 1996, wildlife activist and author Bill McCabe wrote the opposite, saying that there are now enough wildlife photographers around the world and that the issue has become an ongoing attack on animals. Extensive supply of animal images is already available and it has not only contributed to the conservation of animals but has now become a threat to their very existence. He also strongly condemned the worldwide perception of wildlife photography. "When we look at thousands of photos of hooping cranes, how can we say that the bird is missing, when you look at the bird ten times in the picture and once in reality, can you feel where it really is?" Many photographers are shocked by McCabe's words. But, British photographer Niall Benvey thinks the problem is not the photographers but the photographers, their cameras fail to reflect the natural diversity. This should be done without disturbing the animal environment and destroying their habitat in any way.
But in recent times, when someone on vacation or hobbies has an SLR worth at least ড 500, it would be foolish to think that we are not going to lose a species forever. It has been restricted so that the native species of trees growing on both sides of the footpaths can be trampled to save them from extinction. On the other hand, in the southern part of India, the Kani tribes are freely cutting down trees and lights and using splendor to intimidate. And photographers are ruining the habitat of endemic animals in the hope of a better picture.
If professional amateur photographers around the world agree that a good picture is a pure nature, a good picture is a tool to protect their nature and the existence of the earth, then nature photography can be a protection, not a whip for the environment.