Death shaming

Article #14

Death shaming is an assertiveness, rising in countries like Pakistan and India. The word “death shaming” is my own, created to define a specific comportment. But if you look all over the place, you will frequently see this brashness. We have also established some values of death and whoever expires in addition to these standard means of death, we instantly pronounce him to be hellish, unfaithful, and traitorous or a victim of torment.

• Death of solitude,

• Death after a serious disease,

• Disastrous death,

• Not being able to put the body six feet under the ground immediately after death,

• Elimination of limbs at the stint of death (whatever the reason).

• Not all children are well settled at the time of death.

• Committing suicide etc.

In this case, we present the dreadful examination in front of the family. Often those with a subtle heart say that they are not frightened of what will happen to them. Because no one can decide in advance when and how someone will expire.

But from a psychosomatic point of view, we have this terror behind this attitude of death shaming that it may not happen to us. We first pray that Allah lifts the hands and feet while walking. Or God prohibit death in a foreign land and so on. We try to relieve our most dreaded worries with the help of Daniel and depict such deaths in a bad light. There were similar deaths.

We need to comprehend that strong negative examination of someone else's death will not get you out of this fright. But it will also cause more cerebral and sensitive suffering to the family. This fear will disappear when you consciously believe that we too may die. Then take protective actions in this regard and even if we assume that in spite of all the protective dealings our or someone else's death turn out to be aching, then the manner of his death cannot define his character and faith at all. If an unkind person perishes a good death, his unkindness will not end. And if you or I think so, then the difficulty is in our philosophies which need further remark and learning.

Cry over what grief? People be like the way death occurred with the life of the dead. If a person dies between two holy rites, they will see his dead body and say how happy his face is. Neither the alive nor the deceased are putative.

I sense the most intellectual suffering when a person taking care of a sickening person tells him that it is a retribution for immoralities - to make a sick person understand that his sickness is the result of his moralities To make the person hurt more than the illness which will make the person feel shamefaced, humiliated and self-loathing in accumulation to the sickness - strong willpower, sustenance and kindness for their loved ones as well as treatment is essential to fight the ailment. It is significant to give unconditional care to the person in case of sickness, no matter what his character is, not to make him more disgraceful by making him feel shamefaced.

Behind all this comes the idea of beliefs. And more indigenous beliefs and customs than beliefs. In early times, dead bodies of people who died in conflict were seen to have cuts on the upper body or on the back. And in this way the courageousness and faintheartedness (cowardice) of the dead was determined. The person is considered to be a great hero who gets a wound on the chest while the one who gets a wound on the back side of his body is not looked upon with such admiration that he may show his back and run away from the war. Therefore, in writings and poetry, it is a sign of bravery to have wounds on the chest that a person never turn his back from the Warfield and he fought with bravery, to be brave, to be valiant and bold, to face risks manly, to stand strong on the battleground.

Pain, taking on the chest, continuing the attack. The great is probably called the protection.

This is precisely how our philosophies play a part in our mental glitches because we try to validate them with the help of beliefs as an alternative of solving our mental glitches.

As problematic routines in Europe force persons to kill yourself and mental stress and people become more fascinated to liquor or other drugs which is a big motive for this updated life which has an influence on India and Pakistan.

An individual's well-being and personality or an sickness, an epidemic are also connected to such misconceptions, such as linking Corona Virus Disease to punishment, linking AIDS to betrayal, and linking a child's infirmity or epilepsy to a parent's role. This attitude is a tormentor in our culture and is more predominant where there is a lack of literacy, education and consciousness.

All this is done to defend one's beliefs even though it has an undesirable result on the intellectual of the civilization and the individuals. This form of reform civilization needs man to disremember that reform has its own instructions and rules. The nation that accepted them has advanced and flourished. European civilization is an example for us in this regard or the former communist countries where faith nothing was found.

Every person has to decease, all of us has to give an account of our grave. We become the Grand Mufti in the affairs of others and Saman Bikman in our own dealings. Our society is not able to get out of such beliefs which is a moment of image. To make someone understand that your discomfort, pain, sickness, death, etc. is a Karma for your sins, and that you’re aching, pain, disease, death is a test from the God, then we do not accept such a standard, we do not know.

Such ill-informed people do not miss the chance to hound every Homo sapiens on every event.

The witticism of not ingestion when you see a lean individual, the shock of not getting married when you see a virgin girl, all the commiserations of someone having a descendant talking in a tough tone. These are just some of the goal setting shareware that you can use.

They don't really care how their disputes lash up the emotions of others, if someone tries to teach them a little bit of wisdom they will get angry about what we told a lie, or we so they were flippant.

Visiting the sick is essential in Islam because the enduring is fortified and it is better to pray for the bizarre. The illness can mark anyone, even if the Prophet is a prophet. This does not demonstrate that the illness is because immoralities.

I think people in our and other poor states have a lot of time, nothing unusual to do, no capitals, a severe lack of entertainment. Abandoned, tasteless and feeble societies keep thinking such things. In rich western countries, people don't have that much time to discuss such kind of topics.

You might get to see another behavior to the differing. Deliberately proving the dead "Heaven and Rehmat-ul-Allah Alayh". That is, if an oppressor or an individual dies whose life does not imitate to the reputable standards of humans, then we try to wash the character of that person with a few pleasing occurrences that take place at the time of his death. He used to offer prayers and fasts, but if he dies in Ramadan, there must be some concealed goodness in him. I think both of these attitudes point to our insincerity. Perhaps we are consciously trying to create love for the deceased by associating these events with the dead.

Thanks for reading.