The violence of the colonial civil class is not new. But the fact that they will create a position to question the emotions and activities of ordinary Muslims in honor of the Prophet himself is really amazing. The messy writings of a number of popular Islamists really raises the question, are they really thinking about the words? Do they understand the collective benefit of the whole Ummah versus the personal benefit of the slave?
.
It is not possible to answer these religious civil servants one by one. But there is no way not to respond to the huge number of siblings who are drowning in the current created by them against the passions of ordinary Muslims. All their conversations revolve around a few arguments and issues,
.
[1] Out of respect and love for Rasulullah 7, the non-practicing brothers and sisters who are participating in various activities against the peaceful state of France are being humiliated in many ways. Questions such as why they do not wear beards, why they do not wear veils or the Sunnah of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), reciting darood on him, etc. are being dragged out.
.
SubhanAllah! Since when has this civilized class become so violent? These are the ones who, in words, give the brothers the flexibility to be flexible when giving dawah to non-practitioners. Wouldn't these be the ones who would give soft dawah to non-practicing celebrities at different times if the ummah got angry against their anti-Islamic activities? And are these now the non-practicing Muslim brothers and sisters who continue to despise the activities soaked in the love of the Prophet? Are these the ones who are now imposing the Darud text on Rasulullah as a condition? Darud can be called in the lesson. But can't he express his love for R without Darud? Is it illegal or invalid in the eyes of Sharia to express such love to resist the Shatims as much as possible?
.
Such irrational extremist behavior from those who always insisted on softening in words while giving us da'wah, those who used to insist on exercising wisdom in da'wah, makes their double standard clear. They themselves adopt the manhaj of inaction, and in turn they call the ummah to the same inaction.
.
[2] A celebrity Islamist again says with the document of supererogatory worship that Allah prefers the deeds which are done every day. But this document does not apply in this context. Because if there is insult to Rasulullah 6, it is 'obligatory' to deny it as much as possible. Do not see anyone disagreeing on this matter except the final confusion. Now this farjiyat is not realized until the Shatims are completely wiped out from the face of the earth. But even when someone is holding a procession meeting, someone is boycotting French products, someone is trying to write or run a social media campaign, I see that these civilized brothers have started burning.
.
Amal can be called to the amal that can be done every day. But it is not a conflict or a condition to do something to the best of one's ability! So why do brothers write such conversations, from which ordinary people get the opposite message? Moreover, in the case of the procession meeting or demonstration that is being said every day, will the same call be made that the Friday or Eid prayers are not performed every day? Or will you discourage those who do not perform any prayer other than one Friday of the week or two Eid prayers a year? If you think a little while writing a conversation, you will not reveal such a useless incoherence.
.
[3] It is also said that those who are documenting the killing of Shatim are documenting Imam Ibn Taymiyyah's (may Allah have mercy on him) 'As-Sarimul Maslul Ala Shatimir Rasool', but wondering why the Imam wrote the book? Why didn't he kill himself? '
.
Such ridiculous talk is coming SubhanAllah! These arguments are basically a different application of the words, "Why didn't the people who did not rule by the law of Allah call such and such an Imam Kafir and rebel themselves ...". Madkhali is a very favorite argument of the Irjayi class. But even though the Imams had a clear statement, there was never a condition in the Shariah that they should perform their own deeds. Do these brothers understand that they are talking nonsense?
.
Moreover, the context in which As-Sarimul Maslul ala Shatimi's Rasool was written was when the confusion over its provisions began. This was the first such compilation in history, although earlier Imams had preceded this book. Imam Ibn Taymiyyah wrote this book for the first time after his release from prison. And why did he go to jail for the first time? Accused of inciting the people to kill one Shatim. How is it possible to make such a futile argument that ‘he did not kill himself, only wrote a book’, even though he later came out and presented a whole book to the Ummah, and there he proved in clear documents that anyone in the Ummah could kill the Shatim? What is the proof that he did not want to kill himself?
.
And this time-honored book, about which the scholars of the entire Ummah have unanimously agreed, we will not give documents from this book, but from which? The Imam has performed his duty properly. God bless you.
.
Today, the whole Ummah is uniting in the love of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) in honor of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), which is undoubtedly beneficial. But the devout civilists want to suppress this faith of the brothers and sisters, this faith and love. Today's infidels also want us to belittle our prophet like the Jews or the Nazarenes. The disbelievers also want us to say whatever we like about our Prophet, and we do not take any action and we just stop reciting Darud in our minds. And the conversational activity of today's religious civilizations is also becoming consistent with this desire of the infidels; Whatever it is, reluctantly. May Allah guide such captives; Or protect other siblings from their fitnah.
.
Sometimes inaction is a crime. And surely in today's situation it is a heinous crime to be inactive. Because for Allah and His Messenger, our faith is obligatory. May the life and property of this wretched person be sacrificed for the sake of Allah and His Messenger.