Napoleon Bonaparte

Napoleon Bonaparte Last War In Waterloo On June 18, 1815, The Sun Of France's Rise Set But Napoleon Shattered All of Britain's Expansionist Dreams As He Fell' Companies Like East India Of The British Had Grabbed Dozens Of Regions Of The World The King Thought These Successes Would Make Two-Thirds Of The World Part Of British Rule By The End Of The Nineteenth Century.

But Then Napoleon Came And He Came So much so that far from moving forward, it became difficult for the British to run Britain, and in the days to come, the bricks of British rule continued to fall. Napoleon had the largest and most trendy army of the time. It was also economically strong, but it still lost. Why? Military experts attribute Napoleon's defeat to six major reasons, but this is the main reason why Europe was divided at that time.

There were problems between Austria and Germany. There was a fight between Tsar Russia and the Scande Newen countries. The British were buried in dozens of swamps from Japan to India and Australia to South Africa, and the Ottomans in the Islamic world There was a caliphate, and it was also diving into a sea of misery.' This situation was ideal for Napoleon.

If it had divided the warring nations, combined some, and rubbed some, it would have made half the world its colony, but it teased everyone in power. It captured Germany, Egypt, Belgium, The Netherlands, Italy, Austria, and Poland. It also entered Russia and started playing with bricks from Britain's bricks.

This resulted in centuries of eternal enemies coming together, uniting against Napoleon, and then extinguishing the sun of his power in the trenches of Waterloo, thus making Napoleon a part of history and a small country from France's superpowers. History calls Napoleon's mistake Napoleon's fault, whereas compared to Napoleon, the British "divided" the government wherever they did. The formula ' 'Do and Rule'' and time has proved that this formula is, however, the most brilliant technique in the world. Imran Khan is a player and the game does not follow the formula of "divide and rule".

Sports nerves are a game of strength and steaming, while politics is the name of manipulation, give and take, and dialogue. You also dialogue with bloodthirsty politicians. You also convince your enemies by giving something and taking something and you connect your rivals with you and among yourself. Keep breaking and time has proved Imran Khan is a blank in politics.

You see their simplicity. They've been taking credit for two and a half years. I've put them all together. Someone asks them, sir! You had eleven parties in front of you, they were all rivals and enemies of each other. They have been calling each other traitors and "security risks'' for 35 years.

If you were a sensible politician, you would never have allowed them to come together. You would have to "engage" them. You see your simplicity. The establishment kept them apart. It kept them away from Maulana Fazal Rehman's independence march but the Prime Minister pushed them away. Kar put it together in a container.

What was the result? Forty years of enemies united and they pushed the government to slip. I am still surprised why the Prime Minister who can include Chaudhry Sahiban and MQM in the government and who can make Sheikh Rashid the Home Minister cannot dialogue with the People's Party and the N-League? Why did he make a man like Maulana Fazal Rehman his political enemy? And how did it offend Akhtar Mengal and GDA, so the Prime Minister remembered that bringing together enemies is not a success, it is a failure?