In a world ever so more interconnected and interdependent, organizations have created the idea that other countries can’t solve their own internal problemas without international aid. These organizations promise to help other countries, through international organizations who incentivize the “cooperation” and the diplomatic resolutions to these “global” problems. These organizations are indeed effective in some aspects associated with international influence where they founded ORGs with country blocks who take part in this cooperation, several times, commercially. The main ones include: United Nations (1945), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (1949), European Union (1993), World Trade Organization (1995), Group of Twenty (1999) and the International Criminal Court (2002).
All of these International Organizations (IOs) have been created with the goal of maintaining world peace and contributing to the economic growth of the countries most affected by the post-war geopolitical dynamics.
What those OIs propose themselves to do doesn’t really matter in practice, because it is required that we guide ourselves by the actions taken as time went by and analyze what has been done efficiently in the way of changes in international and social relationships of countries submitted to these relations. One of the biggest tasks of the IOs is the premise of being able to exert some kind of joint international pressure in a country that doesn’t follow international agreements. Anyways, this system is not always applied in practice, resulting differently into means of influence directly in the life of citizens and companies who operate in less developed countries.
ORGs are more efficient than PMs for very long term actions, because their actions are more limited in the short term, because of technical, formal and diplomatic characteristics, where more than one agent can question their actions and even claim past actions. In practice these ORGs can have a positive as well as a negative influence in the eyes of the general public. They utilize big global problems to raise financial resources and a great amount of human capital resources to structure measures to be taken by several countries. These measures aim to contain the advance of a catastrophe event created by the organizations themselves, providing then with a closed economic advancement circle of the group’s members and employees of these activities, that can oftentimes be, normatives.
Climate Change: It is known by the more accurate ones as the new international strawman for financial and social control of the less developed countries. It consists in a future catastrophic event that would be caused by human action altering the planet’s temperature.
“Millions of people can be deallocated and the vital infrastructure can be destroyed. The effects of climate change are of far reach and varied and can affect practically every aspect of life on earth.” Global Era Issues
“It’s up to each one os us to do whatever we can to deal with climate changes. If we do not do it, our children and grandchildren will not forgive us”, Georgieva during COP24.
Managing information about the global problem’s thematic makes it possible to encounter other smaller organizations together with environmentalist actions that work hard to create necessary information to sustain his financial and ideological cycle. Mr. Castro-Salazar Central-Director Adjunct of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) alleged that 300 billion dollars would be necessary to contain the emission of greenhouse effect causing gases and to “win up to 20 years” to revert the “problem”.
According to the climatologist and Geography teacher at the University of São Paulo (USP) Ricardo Augusto Felício, the global warming hypothesis does not sustain enough evidence to formulate a theory, because it is about a financial and geopolitical question.
“31 years have passed since the so-called global warming arose. 1/3 of the century has already passed and nothing happened. Thermometers haven’t raised a single degree. The media works for this system. They gain money with this. Global warming became a great industry in the last 30 years.”
The big sums reverted to contain an inexisting problem created by hypotheses together with a great number of governmental institutions handing out outrageous rules is what attributes these organizations the level of maximum influence in the international environment.
The Duties achieved by Political Movements
Whenever a new movement is founded in search of privileges what actually happens is the creation of duties, which configures tax raises in society. According to the progressive prysm, the thin line between right and privilege depends only if the agent is corporate or governmental. If the government by the use of coercion creates a law to privilege, for example, a more vulnerable part of society, that becomes a right. On the other hand, if a company launches a project which seeks to train young people for future job opportunities, that becomes a privilege for those who participate. Logically this eloquent way of thinking tricks a lot of people by not attributing the “less fun part of the conversation”. Who will pay for the created rights? Each new right implies a new duty, because the State cannot create wealth, it actually hinders people’s accumulation of wealth.
“In fact, nature has bestowed human beings with some rights. Such rights are called “natural rights” - that is, rights who are inherent to our human nature; rights that we as human beings enjoy by the simple virtue of being humans. Those rights cannot be denied, because, if they are, the person who denies them is contradicting themself.”
This extract from the Mises Institute clarifies that the existence of rights does not rely on the existence of a State, even less so in the existence of legislation, because they are natural rights of the human being in essence.
“If we want to evaluate if a determined right, a supposed right, is in fact a genuine valid right, it is then necessary that we make a critical and logically irrefutable test, that being: we should all be able to enjoy of this right, in the same time and in the same manner.”
“Only then can this right be considered natural. The obviousness of this affirmation comes from the fact that, for a right to be natural, his enjoyment can’t lead into a conflict or a logical contradiction.”
The dynamic of the SM utilizes the search for privileges as a “struggle” or social democratization, part of those restricted goals being the leadership of action with the intent of placing someone from the movement ahead in politics.
“The Brazilian Constitution of 1988 consolidates in rights, most part of the claims had been given birth in the womb of the incipient brazilian civil society, historically demarcated by the limitations imposed by the conservative forces.” Célia Costal Itamar Nunes.
The possibility of communist parties, auto declared socialists, softened by the SM, syndicates and ONGs in the pre-constitutional conjecture, has allowed the creation of countless duties, a reason why Brazil became the NGO paradise and “set the stage” for the biggest corruption scandal the world has ever seen.
In this sense, it is evident that Social Movements can be taken as being different kinds of political leadership organizations with the aim of introducing significant changes in the perspective of transforming society, alleging to defend the rights of minorities. Their genesis are the urgent demands, wishes and necessities for leadership. These movements introduce themselves alleging to fight against gender, race, class, sexual orientation, religious discrimination and enviromental hazard, lack of leadership, among so many others, charecterizing themselves as the expression of militant postures and social mediation practices.
The affirmative action system for scholarship in public universities: is one of the duties created on the basis of an idea of an impossibility of blacks and public school students competing for a spot with white students or private school students. Two important things that this system exposes are the disbelief in the quality of public schools in face of private schools and the correlation between poverty and access to education. As has already been said, the very creation of privileges to minorities creates a closed circle of poverty in the form of tax raises. In fact, poor people find more difficulties paying so many taxes and up “nailing their own coffin” by creating these new rights. Another important argument is that the competition incited by the restriction of spots allows frauds and a greater hardship for black students in public schools who shall dispute a smaller amount of spots.