Plagiarism and citation - the problems of modern society, which people fight with the help of the law, bring up for general discussion, write articles and books about it.
The purpose of this post is to define the concepts of plagiarism and citation, as well as to analyze the reasons for borrowing design techniques and deliberately appropriating authorship of someone else's work of art. In addition, it is necessary to prove that both concepts are an integral part of design and art in general, and it is not worth giving the problem an unambiguous assessment. Instead, you should look at plagiarism as two different paradigms.
We must not forget that plagiarism is not so unambiguous, and the idea of mimesis was comprehensively developed in ancient aesthetics, starting with Democritus, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. The latter argued that the products of art are the result of combining the originally existing form and matter, and the artist does not create the forms themselves, and only imitates the beauty of the cosmos. Later, Aristotle's follower Thomas Aquinas proclaimed his thesis that "art imitates nature" (ars imitator naturam). According to this teaching, all art is plagiarism.
The topic of plagiarism and quotation does not lose its relevance from the moment the phenomenon itself appeared. Plagiarism has always worried people of various professions - scientists, writers, artists, designers often face the same problem, as,k and answer the same questions. With this in mind, to write the essay, materials related not only to design but also to plagiarism, in general, were used. The answers to the questions posed were also found in philosophical teachings, historical fact,s and scientific articles related to plagiarism in the literary field.
Definition of the concepts of plagiarism and citation
Plagiarism is the appropriation of the fruits of someone else's creativity: the publication of someone else's works under one’s name without specifying the source, or using without transformative creative changes made by the borrower.
Quoting is a phenomenon that intersects with direct, indirect,c,t, and not direct speech, as with certain syntactic patterns. Functioning in the author's narration, citation takes part in the formation of the type of utterance.
The use of a reproduction of a painting as a direct quote or a slight modification of it with purposeful preservation of recognizability will probably not be read as an unambiguous quotation from the view but will be regarded as plagiarism
These two concepts have become almost indistinguishable outside the civil code, which covers only a small part of the concept due to the complexity of proving plagiarism. Unlike dictionary definitions that take into account only two forms of plagiarism - borrowing a work in whole or in part - the formal plagiarism paradigm is much broader: it includes the entire possible spectrum of appropriation of someone else's work: from banal reproduction of the text in whole or in part to theft at the level of ideas, concepts and terminology.
The views of different people in the same situation can characterize it in two ways. There is a lot of controversy about what is plagiarism and what is quoting. Oftentimes, even quoting a recognizable work of art is considered plagiarism from viewers.
In the conditions of information accessibility, it has become difficult to control the separation of the concepts of plagiarism and quotation. The definition of plagiarism as “misappropriation of someone else's without citing authorship and without modification, punishable by law” also raises the issue of unintentional plagiarism, when an idea lying on the surface finds its way out in the works of several authors. Similarly, it is not clear whether the following common trends and using universal forms can be considered theft. Do not forget about similar works of art that arose under the influence of certain historical situations in completely different cultures.
Very thorough explanation, thanks for sharing.