The responses of countries to the COVID-19 pandemic have been disparate.1, 2 Many countries are reopening workplaces, schools, and social gatherings and striving to adapt their economies and resume international travel. Other countries are attempting to suppress transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by again restricting businesses, industries, and schools while hoping for future COVID-19 vaccines or treatments. The Strategic and Technical Advisory Group for Infectious Hazards (STAG-IH), the independent advisory group to the WHO Health Emergencies Programme, has reviewed information from countries around the world and has concluded that the most sound approach on the basis of current understanding is to deploy long-term strategies with a focus on preventing amplification of transmission, protecting those most at risk of severe illness, and supporting research to better understand the virus, the disease, and people's responses to them.
Evidence suggests that children shed SARS-CoV-2 as do adults, mostly with non-severe clinical presentations.3 But many characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 are not yet fully understood, such as the levels of immunity and the immune response, the full spectrum of disease and long-term sequelae, the possibility of re-infection,4, 5 and the potential of the virus to become endemic. Until more is known about the immune response to SARS-CoV-2, it is not possible to make sound predictions.
Living with the COVID-19 pandemic: act now with the tools we have
et al.
Published:October 08, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32117-6
The responses of countries to the COVID-19 pandemic have been disparate.1, 2 Many countries are reopening workplaces, schools, and social gatherings and striving to adapt their economies and resume international travel. Other countries are attempting to suppress transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by again restricting businesses, industries, and schools while hoping for future COVID-19 vaccines or treatments. The Strategic and Technical Advisory Group for Infectious Hazards (STAG-IH), the independent advisory group to the WHO Health Emergencies Programme, has reviewed information from countries around the world and has concluded that the most sound approach on the basis of current understanding is to deploy long-term strategies with a focus on preventing amplification of transmission, protecting those most at risk of severe illness, and supporting research to better understand the virus, the disease, and people's responses to them.
Evidence suggests that children shed SARS-CoV-2 as do adults, mostly with non-severe clinical presentations.3 But many characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 are not yet fully understood, such as the levels of immunity and the immune response, the full spectrum of disease and long-term sequelae, the possibility of re-infection,4, 5 and the potential of the virus to become endemic. Until more is known about the immune response to SARS-CoV-2, it is not possible to make sound predictions.
• View related content for this article
SARS-CoV-2 does not seem to behave epidemiologically like influenza virus and continues to resurge in clusters or outbreaks, not always in waves with rapid widespread community transmission.6 With a more precise and epidemiologically based public health response involving active case finding, contact tracing, and strategic testing strategies, outbreaks caused by SARS-CoV-2 can be contained and community spread decreased to a more manageable level.7 Some countries in Asia and Europe (eg, South Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Vietnam, and Germany)1, 2 have shown that this approach keeps transmission at sustainably lower and safer levels than in countries not following this approach, thus preventing surges of patients in health facilities and decreasing overall mortality.2 This approach is based on three principles: understanding, trust, and participation by all population groups; decreased transmission of SARS-CoV-2 using basic epidemiological and public health interventions; and acknowledging that any potential COVID-19 vaccines and treatments will only be part of the solution and that they will best perform in conjunction with a long-term overall public health strategy. The components of this epidemiologically based public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic (panel)8 are familiar to public health specialists, but have been neglected or are inappropriately understood in some countries, both by leaders and the general public.
Alongside this comprehensive response, continued assessment is needed of how best to resume international travel. Most countries have focused on international travel as a risk for the (re)introduction of SARS-CoV-2 and use various risk-mitigation strategies (eg, PCR testing of international travellers and voluntary or mandatory isolation after arrival). Yet there is no optimum way to prevent importation of SARS-CoV-2, no matter how rigorously quarantine and testing are applied, because of the range in the SARS-CoV-2 incubation period (2–14 days),11 the spectrum of disease (with subclinical and mild illness in many infected individuals), the fact that many travellers return to households with others who are not quarantined, and the number of days after infection to the time when PCR testing becomes positive. Other measures that could be equally or more effective include urging travellers to monitor their health and recommending they do not travel when ill; questioning travellers about their health status immediately before they travel; adhering to personal hygiene measures, physical distancing, and wearing masks in public when physical distancing is not possible; reporting illnesses to the destination country; and ensuring implementation of measures to provide safe travel environments. Introduction of digital smart tools might complement these measures and their evaluation should be continued.
Many countries consider that travel is safer from locations with low circulation of SARS-CoV-2 and strong capacities for outbreak containment, and they are keen to obtain credible information about the infection and transmission status of other countries. Available WHO case reports are, however, based on laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and since testing strategies vary by country2 they are not an accurate indication of true transmission rates. Identification and use of more meaningful indicators of infection and transmission status are urgently required.
COVID-19 vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics are important for the pandemic response, and if any of the COVID-19 vaccine candidates are shown to be safe and effective, they will probably be deployed before full approval through emergency use authorisations or other strategies. Strategies must be developed to ensure equitable access through the COVAX pillar of the Access to COVID-19 Tools (ACT) Accelerator12 and other mechanisms. In terms of treatments, use of glucocorticoids for critically ill patients is now best practice on the basis of evidence from clinical trials.13 Other therapeutics, including antivirals (nucleoside analogues and antibody preparations) and immunomodulators, continue to be investigated.14 Multiple diagnostic tests for nucleic acid, antigen, and antibody are being evaluated, including by a partnership between WHO and the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND).15 As results of this research become available, countries will be able to make decisions about which tests meet their own standards and fit with their testing strategies. One example is the announcement by WHO, FIND, and The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria on the provision of externally validated, point-of-care rapid antigen detection diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2.16 As other diagnostic tests are externally validated, they must be made widely available through the ACT Accelerator and other access mechanisms. Despite the urgency of identifying effective therapeutics and vaccines for COVID-19, the rules of science and the ethics of clinical research do not change in the setting of a pandemic. The most effective way to develop vaccines and therapeutics is through trials with robust safety and efficacy endpoints.
With current knowledge, even in the absence of COVID-19 vaccines or treatments and comprehensive knowledge of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2, countries can navigate pathways to reduced transmission, decreased severe illness and mortality, and less economic disruption in the short and longer term. Despite geopolitical tensions, information contributing to greater understanding of COVID-19 continues to be shared within the scientific community and with WHO. International travel is increasing, economic and education sectors are reopening, and countries are benefiting from the experiences of others as they continue to live with the COVID-19 pandemic and develop more effective control strategies.
We are all members of the WHO Strategic and Technical Advisory Group for Infectious Hazards and declare no competing interests.
🥺