@Macronald 31 August 2020 more from that month

Read.cash POINTified?

Yes! Pointified is not an English word, I just made it up. The focus should be on the **point** aspect of the word. Last night I logged in to read.cash after some days of inactivity due to the reasons I stated in my previous article. The first two articles on my home page were about points. When I scrolled down to about the tenth homepage articles, I found three more. That's five out of the first ten homepage articles were about points. I won't be surprised to see more if I kept scrolling. https://read.cash/@Macronald/what-have-i-missed-b157d159 **What is happening? Has read.cash be "pointified"?** Most of the writers were celebrating earning new high total points. I understand the joy and all, and I'm sincerely happy for them and I would have probably done the same, If I had achieved such a feat sometime ago. But like a friend would say, ***is that why we are here?*** I also got this from @Jane 's post Yesterday, many complained about the point system. Many gets zero to low points for the entire day even if the user posted articles while some claimed that they’ve got good points through giving positive comments to random articles. Some even didn't get points at all for the whole week. Some were celebrating earning huge points while many complained of no, low or frozen points. The part that caught my attention most was this: *User for 5 hours yet got 49 subscribers and a payment of $0.21 without even posting articles.* How did he or she do that? Well, we can't ask for more points and expect a higher point price, because the total points earned daily is inversely proposal to point price. The more total points people earn daily, the less the point price.