I am Confused ❓

Same here, I don't like that scheme for it is not fair and now I am involved 😂 how come.

This issue now is a big mystery to all of us. I'm hoping for read.cash to reply.

You mean I am not clean @Ching? Those I read, comment, upvote and tip do not deserve it? Thank you for letting me know.

Of course, we are not cheating, I don't believe we do that the bot has the wrong detection for sure!

The bot is simple. If you upvote someone more than once it's an upvote circle and you will be punished. The bot can not read and @Read.Cash doesn't read and doesn't care about good writers. It's sad it came this far within two months time all because of the fight against scam and spam. Since read.cash told me the OC checker doesn't stand for plagiarism (although that's why they developed it) and they basically own what I post here (we will see about that I never signed for it as I joined this platform) I will consider if it's still worth being exclusive here. I don't see the need to give them the rights of my intellect property. Besides for a good author it's a risk to publish on the internet first. Within a few days time this platform harmed my good name twice. This is something to take into consideration as well.

So we are punished without proper basis. I also think this one before that this platform own our published articles here..

The base is how the hot is programmed. It detects how frequently you upvote or who knows even comment someone. If that's too much you are a scam and are punished for that because you drain the fund! The bot can't read and read.cash doesn't read to check if the upvote is deserved. They do not have the time to do so or simply do not care about good or bad content.

Exactly, agree with you on that. That bot is a scam itself, detecting wrong people as it does not read, the basis of its detection is when you frequently upvote or commented the writer, even without asking upvote in return. Some people listed, I didn't upvote and they didn't upvote me either they are just frequently leaving comments to my articles and yet already considered upvoting circle lol.

It can not be perfect because it takes too much time to develop and run it but this hurt the reputation of good writers and read.cash should have a look at it. They do not mention names, say what the upvote circles are, there's no way to avoid it unless you stop upvoting.

Yeah, I guess so that's the only way to avoid stop upvoting. Sadly they don't even show us listing so we will know if we did it, and don't have warnings also. We will just be surprised like boom I am part of it without my notice.

It is as it is. There's no list,the bot makes it up while running and what is wrong today can be good tomorrow.

Then, what about my case. I haven't upvoted anyone but I have been involved in the upvoting circle. Eybyoung never upvoted me too but I'm involved in her 'upvoting circle scheme' accusation. We are judged here without a proper basis and that's the problem. Just so you know, intellectual rights are important that is why read.cash has an OC checker.

You have no intellectual rights if you post here first. I just changed the rules of the communities I host. Read.cash claims they own it. It might not bother you but it does to a good author, same with how good author's their names are getting a bad reputation here. Those good authors are not just blogging.

Well, the site claims they own the articles because it is posted here but they still give credits to the authors by showing our profiles. Can't you see it? I don't see why you say we dont have the rights, cause read.cash still allows us to back up our articles. If you want to be properly known for your writings without a website being attached to it, you can make your own website and host it alone.

They can claim that but it's not how it works and not what I signed for. It's on their platform which I promote with my articles. Articles which are to their opinion not worth an upvote, articles I can edit, delete or post where ever I like. They didn't buy it from me.

This is a free platform, of course, they won't buy it.

This means they do not have the rights either.

Well, they shouldn't have.

😂😂😂😂 I don't know too why is that so many 😂

Let's just continue commenting each other our conscience is clear.

Opo

Can you explain the "respect" part on this? I understand scam and spam is something to fight. What I do not understand is why really good authors do not deserve to be upvoted.

I am 100% sure read.cash did not read what they wrote. If they did they wouldn't decide this way and if there's only one conclusion left: envy! They envy their good authors and do not want them to earn although they claim what these authors write is their property!

Respect in that message means that i will obey n follow what they want me to do, so i will stop it n just gave comments

Perhaps it's better and saver for all of us if that up and downvote option is removed. It will save many a lot of stress. What you say is actually you do not care about giving an upvote, rewarding someone for being good. You agree they do not deserve it. Did you ever gave an upvote at all?

If i'm guessing it right, upvotes also means the like sign, thumb sign n i did do upvotes before n even gave a portion of what i've earned before as a token of their appreciation with my comments with them, just returned the favor or good thing they've done to me n i am also on penalty now although even before i received that notification this morning, my points isn't moving n remains zero for almost 2weeks now n i guess, i will wait for another 2weeks for the penalty to be removed n my points will be back

Yes, it's that thumb up sign. You better no longer use it unless read.cash tells how many times a day it is permitted. If it's not at all they better remove the option. I do not join many communities, follow writers I think are good and promising and read all of them. This doesn't mean I created an upvote circle. I reward what is good. Who knows me knows I do not like everything written and I tell people what I don't like but also if I like it. Good to me doesn't mean I need to like the subject or agree with what is published, I even do not need to like that person. It's not how I work. Good is good.

Yes, i will n in fact, i'm just on comment thing right now :)

Good luck, stay safe and keep your content safe. Exclusivity is no longer required. 🍀💕

Ditto, miss wakeupkitty n thanks :)

👍

I hope you will never get involved in this too 😂 this is really confusing, but whatever, just let it be.

Yes dear...

In learning? In learning what? That really good writers do not deserve an upvote and are abandoned and trash is rewarded? What is the learning aspect of it? Read.cash did not even read what those good authors wrote. There are names on their bot's list of good authors, people who publish or will publish and their name is dragged through the mud. They invested in this platform to give this platform a good name.

Wala ka na rin points?

Yaaah. Nakasulat din name mo sa message sakin

Tsk di nmn tayo nagpalitan nang upvote dba? Haaay

Nahhh I am strong and this thing is just a glitch on me 😂😂

Just keep going everything will be fine soon.

Yeah, I think so 😂 that's how it works now I know lol.

What do you mean? I comment and upvote you too like many other users. Does that mean you are part of my upvote circle or does it mean I think you improved from writing plagiarism to a good writer?

What I only meant was maybe that's how the bot/system was programmed.

Nahh don't say that 😭 you are a good writer to me, I even improve my style of writing because of you. Me too, that's why I am really confused about how come we are part of this upvoting circle tsk. Maybe this is just a misunderstanding or whatever it is. I didn't let this thing gets into my heart so I won't be hurt that bad tsk.

I noticed you improved a lot and I wish I could reward you for it but it's forbidden here. I hope you will be improving and not give up on you. It's a pity, sad, to see how those who really invest are punished. I guess that's how it works. One spoils it for all. 🍀

Maybe they does not want some writers to improve because if they get upvotes it will drained the fund 😂

Have you noticed 10k is gone within one week? That cannot be because of rewarding 800 users who share 50$ a day... But I think you are right. Good was needed to promote this platform but they shouldn't be rewarded or noticed.

Well, I guess, they only value or give proper rewards to those who tackle about BCH. As this platform using this BCH crypto.

They told me they don't and find those post boring. Reasons: old news plus most who wrote about it have no knowledge about cryptocurrencies at all. Same with posts about read.cash. They are not appreciated. Both topics I suggested for the contest and were denied.

The bots work in a way simpler way. It counts words (articles and comments) perhaps activity= oints. That's it.

The "fund guard bot" counts upvotes given to a person if too much = upvote circle and x accounts at one wifi divided to the total amount of points = ... points per account.

They are looking for good writers indeed that is why they updated the rules strictly to be fair to those good writers who write good content. Please understand it more, the problem is we have been accused of cheating even though we never did that. It is just that simple. You are being melodramatic.