One of the biggest arguments for the adoption of Cryptocurrency is that we run a decentralised network. We pride ourselves in the fact that there is no central authority controlling the distribution of wealth. But a lot of happenings might point to a different direction that there is a caucus who control a chunk of the funds.
Many should still remember the whole Steemit and Hive and Justin Sun brouhaha, we learnt a big lesson from it all that the top guys can do and undo. All it took for Justin Sun to be able to dethrone the Steemit witnesses was for him to connive with the owners of Binance, Huobi, and Poloniex (which Sun owns) to give him users tokens. Incidentally or unincidentally, the owners of these Exchanges are Chinese just like Sun.
Also think back to Binance acquiring CoinMarketCap, now CZ Binance owns arguably the biggest exchange, the biggest price and market cap checking site and also once of the biggest Bitcoin mining pools alongside hands in a lot of other things. If this is not centralisation to you i don't know what else is.
Personally I don't like CZ and Binance (sadly I still trade there). But then if there is anything you can bet your Bitcoin on, it is that these men are silently (come to think of it, they are not even silent about it any longer), they are loudly centralising Cryptocurrency.
🤔, your writings gives me a reason to believe that crypto isn't really decentralised