Zero Knowledge Proof

0 33
Avatar for Doe
Written by
3 years ago

Zero-knowledge proofs are a common cryptographic method that uses probabilistic assessments to allow parties to validate data without having to disclose or share the underlying data. The method was first proposed by a group of MIT researchers in the late 1980s, and it has since gained popularity in the blockchain industry. Nowadays, zero-knowledge proofs play an important role in the business world by safely verifying confidential data.

What Issues are Solved by Zero-Knowledge Proofs?

Zero-knowledge proofs answer a variety of concerns that companies and individuals face. There are a number of situations in which one party must check that they have such data without exposing it.

The Treasure Parable

Consider this scenario: you know the location of a hidden temple full of treasure, and another party has the key to open the temple. They demand proof of ownership of the map before agreeing to join forces. You are aware, however, that if you disclose the location of the treasure, you will be made obsolete.

You formulate another tactic to prove you own the map because showing it explicitly will jeopardise your value and future windfall. You have the first steps of the journey instead of displaying the map directly. The keyholder recognises that only the map holder has this valuable information, and after some back-and-forth questioning, they believe you do indeed possess the location of the ancient temple.

Replace the treasure with a cryptocurrency address and the key with a private key in the same case. It's easy to see why zero-knowledge proofs have become such an important part of doing business on the blockchain in this way.

Privacy

One of the key advantages of zero-knowledge proofs is that they aid in the preservation of privacy. Details can be checked without revealing it explicitly to third parties. Individuals may use these protocols in the real world to check their identity without exposing confidential information like social security numbers.

Efficient

Zero-knowledge proofs can speed up data verification in many cases, particularly when dealing with complex equations. It's much easier for a machine to use zero-knowledge proofs than it is to recalculate a big equation. More savings and a more responsive network result from this performance.

How Zero-Knowledge Proofs works?

There are several forms of zero-knowledge proofs in use today. Although their strategies differ, they all use the same approach. They include tiny pieces of unlinkable data that would be almost impossible for an outside party to obtain without disclosing crucial details.

It's important to realise that zero-knowledge proofs aren't perfect because there's always the possibility that someone might guess the details given separately. When all of the information is combined, there is such a high likelihood of ownership that it is almost impossible to fake.

Interactive Constructs vs. Non-Interactive Constructs

In today's world, there are two major types of zero-knowledge proofs. Interactive zero-knowledge proofs are the first technique. This is the concept's first iteration. It necessitates several data exchanges between the two parties before a certain degree of assurance can be confirmed. While this approach is very efficient, it does expose the parties involved in the equation.

Non-Interactive Constructs

Non-interactive frameworks extend the zero-knowledge-proof principle by removing the need for direct communication between the parties. This method is relatively new and is mainly used in the blockchain industry. This method, in most cases, relies on a setup step that generates a standard reference string.

Zero-Knowledge Proofs in Cryptocurrency

Recently, zero-knowledge proofs have found a home in the cryptosphere. The cryptographic structures used in today's blockchains are well-suited to these protocols. Early cryptocurrencies didn't have anything equivalent, which resulted in issues like robbery and fraud.

Bitcoin transactions, for example, show the sender, recipient, time, and number. Although third-party protocols and additional systems like CoinJoin can obfuscate this data, they aren't as successful as zero-knowledge proofs.

Thanks to the network's innovative zk-SNARK protocols, Z-Cash was the first cryptocurrency to effectively use zero-knowledge proofs. zk-SNARK, for example, stands for Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Knowledge Statement. This next-generation protocol offers users a degree of privacy that was previously inaccessible.

The Future of Zero-Knowledge Proofs

Identity testing is one of the most important fields of growth for zero-knowledge proofs. Both big institutional and government-level hacks and identity theft have been on the rise. Since they have fewer attack vectors, the use of zero-knowledge proofs may help to mitigate these concerns. Your personal information is stored on a third-party server any time you provide it. If this device is hacked, you are also vulnerable to attack.

By removing the need to include this information in the first place, zero-knowledge proofs could be able to avoid these security risks. Imagine heading to the doctor's office and providing zero-knowledge evidence instead of displaying identification or filling out a registration form. You'd be able to show who you think you are and not have to worry about the office's security measures. The medical industry, as well as other systems that historically store a lot of personal data, are increasingly embracing this approach.

Final Thoughts

In an increasingly hostile digital world, zero-knowledge proofs give a ray of hope. They may be the secret to safeguarding citizens' personal information from state-sponsored hackers and expanding international cyber warfare. They play a critical role in securing blockchains and other digital networks, at the very least. As a result, you should expect to see more of these useful systems integrated across several industries.

10
$ 3.74
$ 3.69 from @TheRandomRewarder
$ 0.05 from @chrishoffman
Avatar for Doe
Written by
3 years ago

Comments