Religious freedom or oppression of faith?

🔥Commentaries on controversial House Bill 4633 of 2019🔥

The said house bill is focused on removing religious mementos like Crucifixes in hospital suites, or make it optional at least, because according to Marcoleta crucifix is a representation of Catholicism.

I was intrigued in such issue, I can't imagine that a representative at the congress can think of this kind of bill — which is obviously very irrelevant at this time of crisis.

On my research, I found that the author of this bill is Rep. Marcoleta of Sagip Partylist, a member of an organisation that holds much influence when it comes to bloc voting — INC.

Well, I want to share some points why this bill is irrelevant or better to say “trash it.”

⚠In our constitution, don't we have freedom to express or practice our faith, religion or belief?

❓Why do we need to remove crucifixes in hospitals, which in the first place “You” as the patient has the option whether or not be admitted to a Catholic Hospitals — where in fact you should be aware that Catholic institutions always have crucifixes installed in every corner of its building. Well, when you say “OPTIONAL” that could be implemented for government run hospitals. Maybe, if you're the patient, better yet decide not to be admitted to Catholic Hospitals so that you don't have problems with crucifixes.

⚠We're still in challenging time due to pandemic.

❓How do you think, that creating this bill would really help to improve your constituents way of living? Do you think people who are admitted due to COVID 19 in Hospitals without crucifixes would get well soon compared to those who are admitted in hospitals with crucifixes?

⚠“OPTIONAL”

❓How about installing crucifixes in a non-Catholic hospitals should be optional, once catholic patient is admitted? For example, in New Era Hospital, would you install crucifixes or other mementos if Catholic patients requested for it? Let's have a deal? I bet you won't.

⚠DESCENT OPPRESSION

🐉INC is well known on their doctrine “obey and never complain.” How can we say that there is no CONFLICT OF INTEREST if an INC member took an office in the government? Well, obey and never complain can tell : whatever the INC's management instructions are, as a member you must obey. Now, since Rep. Marcoleta is an INC member and he got a position at the congress as a representative, it will be easier for INC's management to indoctrinate the congress with their beliefs thru Rep. Marcoleta.

Mr. Marcoleta will be their legal cover, he will be tasked to file a bill and make it a law, not for general interest, but for INC's interest. By simply creating a bill to disallow institutions on installing or hanging crucifixes on and in its buildings, such as hospitals is a sign of oppression — a descent oppression, in a sense that they are trying to impose something, by creating something to be legally accepted but is against or it is already oppressing someone, somebody and or an organisation's faith.

⚠POWER TRIPPING

🔥Since INC has a strong binding powers on their members, it is easy for them to play the game “POWER TRIPING”. Obviously, aspiring political candidates and even incumbent candidates are very overwhelmed on INC's bloc voting, thus they are lining up to have an appointment with the general manager so that they can assure their advantage on polls. There you go “UTANG NA LOOB”, since winning politicians owes INC for their wins, INC would probably ask favors from the politician who won on election, now it's up to them on HOW they will pay back or in WHAT way. Who knows? As I research, I discovered that INC's are actually lobbying on appointment in judiciary, PNP and BOC — this is to make sure that INC's bet will be chosen, in that case their members are well protected for whatsoever reasons. Going back on Marcoleta's, he seems to start up igniting — he would make sure that his fellow congressmen/representative will support his bill, otherwise identified representatives who voted NO on his bill will never taste the sweetness of political reigns again.

ℹThis issue is no longer about SEPARATION of Church and State, because they were now able to manipulate the government from legislative to executive; who knows even judiciary. Haven't you noticed right? Because there's an evil pretending to be an angel of light. This evil is overpowering even the government, he is making ways to oppress the beliefs of others discretely, especially Catholics who is in Christ. This evil got enough of power and authority, he is being worshipped as god of politicians — because they want to win : for power, for money, for authority. They make their money, authority and power as gods — this is the true idolatry.

On my last notes, I want to share what is crucifix according to Merriam-Webster dictionary.

Crucifix

: a model of a cross with a figure of Jesus Christ crucified on it

Full Definition

: a representation of Christ on the cross

Thus, it is clear that Rep. Marcoleta's bill purpose is to remove the representation of Christ on the cross in hospitals. Therefore, the call to trash this bill is crucial. He is not making the bill for the benefit of Christ believer nor to the non-christian, rather he is taking away Christ from the true Christians.

Can you remember what they say? “Actions speaks louder than words” now look! Aside from Marcoleta's actions on filing the bill, his words are speaking them clearly. Now, who is the anti-Christ?

Let's uphold yhe constitution. Please pray for the Philippines.