The financial expert J.K. Galbraith once expressed, "Confronted with a call between altering one's perspective and demonstrating there's no compelling reason to try and do per se, nearly everybody gets occupied with the evidence."
Leo Tolstoy was considerably bolder: "The most troublesome subjects are often disclosed to the foremost lethargic witted man on the off chance that he has not shaped any thought of them as of now; however the smallest amount complex thing cannot be clarified to the foremost keen man on the off chance that he's immovably convinced that he knows as of now, without a tragic remnant of uncertainty, what's laid before him."
What's happening here? For what reason don't realities alter our perspectives? Furthermore, for what reason would somebody continue accepting a bogus or wrong thought at any rate? How do such practices serve us?