Introduction

According to a typical mindset a model society must have a basis in ethical standards deemed socially necessary.  A code of ethics that citizens derived from their own perspective and experience. Though they have their families well being or self interest as their motivation socially their intention seems to be altruistic. This isn't functionally altruism but the opposite greed though this isn't how it's perceived. Perspective limits the ability to empathize with those who have a irregular mindset. Depending on how much their ethical concerns differ from what they had  attributed to normalcy. They allow basser instincts to cloud their judgment perceiving the different ideology as an attack of their beliefs.

Conflicting ideals are conflict
      This is a psychological reaction to conflicting information. New information regardless of it's legitimacy or validity to the observer is an attack. Humanity falls to learn regardless of the number of times they're confronted by a proven fact they double the mental barriers as if you're an attacker. Though not from their perspective to those whom are reacting to the clashing ideologies they allow themselves to believe that they have the correct information.  Despite their mental gymnastics and conspiracy theories that they may require to forcefully shape how reality operates from their view point.  Considering that even flat earth conspiracy theorists are unlikely to change as doing so would have a negative impact on their identity.

Freudian model vs Paul D. MacLean interpretation

        Ego and the ID regardless of how you may view humanity as a whole this intricacy of our being the neomammalian, paleomammalian, and  reptilian complex decide everything. The notion of a super ego is flawed to say the least as you could also attribute the subconscious drive to both the ego and ID so the model is flawed. Not only that but it doesn't really account for the higher learning processes so I personally prefer Paul D. MacLean's interpretation to Sigmund Freud's Freudian model. 

Macleans interpretation explained

        While running the risk of trying to simplify a psychological model of human neurological processes ill try to outline the basics. Beginning with the basal ganglia (reptilian brain) this is responsible for the instinctual traits of aggression, dominance, and territorial or ritualistic dispute. Paleomammalian complex has been referred to as the limbic system which MacLean attributes to early mammalian evolution. Attributed to motivation and emotion involved in feeding, reproductive behavior, and parental behavior. Neomammalian complex consists of the cerebral neocortex thought to be responsible for the ability for language, abstraction, planning, and perception. This is unique in that the cerebral neocortex is found only in higher mammals.

My inspiration

          Now that I have bored you asleep I will get to the crux of the issue my purpose for writing this. I have come to realize that potentially alot of what we attribute to higher functionality of our brain is not. While some people can attribute their actions to perceptive observations and abstract planning. Most people likely don't from my observations i noticed a couple of characteristics that many mistakenly have attributed to higher learning mistakenly.  This is unfortunately the byproduct of a social conditioning that attempts to suppress the reptilian and neomammalian traits has facilitated their dominance of society's psyche.

By utilizing fear to deter socially unsavory habits and beliefs we have infact devolved ourselves.  This means that by promoting a model societal construct the method that we have used is not grounded in reasoning but in a risk reward system that doesn't recognize the need for vices.  Inevitability the problem increases in severity until their own perspective is not one of reason but one of delusion.

Different approach

             Perhaps the answer is not  to restrict the populations ability to access vices such as  cannabis,  tobacco, gambling, and alcohol. I not so irresponsible to suggest that minors should have access however adults should have the choice. This may be a health risk for those whom partake to frequently although you're not concerned with the obvious detriment to society's mental health. Our current system assumes that we are  powerful enough to make such decisions. If you're not aware of the issues with the current system it's not likely that disregarding social dysfunction is going to help.

Vice is powerful and required

             There's actually a fairly simple solution for the world's issues with clarity concerning reality.  This isn't the most popular opinion but the opposite approach is necessary for social stability.  The majority will not have a reason to violate their own ethics. While those whom are currently oppressed and provide a deficit as a result will be able to determine appropriately whether or not vices will provide a necessary evil. 

For many this is not a problem but a solution many people likely don't understand their perspective so we punish what we can not understand. If you are going to learn one thing today let it be this Marijuana is not as negative to your health as you may think. I know  over ten people who are only alive because of it's legitimate healing abilities.  The most important of these health benefits is the THC and CBDs affects on cancer. I have personally seen it's affect saving two childhood friends.

doctor almost killed me                

  I personally only have started using Marijuana in 2018 i'm 30 the only reason I even started was. My previous doctor retired and my new doctor had decided to switch my medication. I had previously been using ultram for pain from 2 herniated vertebrae and ulsters. This new medication a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac was not considered to be as dangerous as the ultram due to the  socially stigmatized opioid that ultram is synthetically modeled from. I had been taking the new medication as recommended for  3 days  and  blacked out at work. I finally regained consciousness 3 -4 hours later the ER staff said that they where not certain i would survive i had been in shock for a hour or more. It was a socially obligatory judgment my doctor used to decide how to treat me.  As a result I almost died  not once but twice before I decided to stop getting medical treatment.

Vulture extinction?

              Fun little fact for you  the medication that I mentioned diclofenac it was in the news at about the same time I was almost killed by it. Google it diclofenac has caused a species of vulture to go extinct and it is not currently outlawed in the u.s doesn't matter how many people die as long as nobody is high.

              For those who are currently cursing me and the screen stop for just a moment and consider the possibility that you are not basing your own decisions on biased opinions and not rational research.  There's also a possibility that I have based my thoughts on opinion not fact. Granted the argument is flawed however here's some indisputable facts about economics. Look at historical instances of prohibition of alcohol or even just how every country has it's own past in which they profited from either suffering or sleiz realistically both.

working class life

         If you're a working class individual you can relate to the ridiculous amount of effort you exerted on a almost constant basis i work 12 hrs a day in construction so I know what work does to your health. It's nearly killed me twice im 30 I have been working since 16 and I don't know how many projects I have completed far more than 100  probably closer to 1000. I'm not bragging just explaining i have work ethic and am requested for antique property renovation and repair. This isn't the easiest job for those who are injured but the jobs are a little less inhumane when you have access to proper pain management options. Car accidents and finger amputation are less painful than  7 /12 hour days moving literally tons of material.

 disregard unless you want to read why i hate the president
             P.S not trying to get political but if anyone who was half way competent worked on Trumps wall. It wouldn't be cracking at the foundation if I had done that they would have sued my employer. Trump isn't a person that I personally agree with, respect or even assume that he's able to read. I can't possibly apologize enough for his behavior to me its like letting a fish play a video game. He's not going to likely understand what is happening and anything similar to progress is just a result of misreading two unrelated instances that seem relevant to one another but aren't. Mr.president the term is largely biggly isn't a word it's important to me that you know that.