Breaking Stereotypes and Changing

There are not many factors that affect people. Isn't it astonishing to see people with the same potential, or similar, differ in different environments?

I've always been interested in how students in the same social environment, in the same school, and with the same interests and skills, differ later on. There are many reasons for this, of course. Humans are really good at adapting to their environment. While some people cannot peel apples and potatoes even at a minimum level when they are young, you can see that they can work very successfully in laboratory conditions that require millimeter measurements and high level dexterity. Yet another person finds himself in social dialogues that he never likes, and quite productively.

I think some psychological studies also support this thesis. This approach suggests that two similarly qualified young people can emerge as completely different people in different environments. He states that we can see one as a master side cutter and the other as a master of academic environments.

When people who spend years grazing the herds of animals for which they are responsible only, doing garden and field work, appear in metropolitan areas where intense human relations are experienced, these successes of individuals whose past we know more or less are definitely a real success story. Of course, a power of harmony within a short period of time, as if we have been in those environments for years, leads us to other questions as well.

This subject, which is frequently on the agenda of those who are interested in social sciences, is also worth doing research on. The structures that hold the administrative power look for ways to manage people and naturally the society more easily. Being able to influence people more efficiently, more understandingly, tolerantly, effectively, dynamically and positively naturally facilitates the achievement of the goals they set.

So far, we have expressed the nature of the work, that environments can manipulate us with their unique relationship networks, and desired behaviors and stances can emerge. Is this the case under all circumstances? Can individuals from all social segments perform the positive and constructive behaviors expected of them in different environments, at least at minimum scales? I do not think so. Don't we also see people who speak in a comfortable and loud tone in public transportation vehicles, those who spit on the ground as if they are spitting in the sink while walking on the street or street, and those who throw the container of chocolate in their child's hand into the street randomly and without discomfort? So there is a mistake somewhere. I guess this issue directs us to the educational processes.

Those who have sufficiently assimilated the core values ​​and others who have been deprived of this precious treasure. Since we live with them and share the same spaces and social rights, this issue naturally deserves the attention of each of us. Nobody wants to wait for hours in front of the ATM, right? Similarly, in front of a bank teller, the teller ignores you for tens of minutes as if you were not there and without breaking his agitation.

I don't think I need to explain why the education given in the family is above everything else. What happened at the breakfast table means that it will also happen at the breakfast tables of tomorrow. Similarly, it can be a good example for the brothers to conclude the issue without personalizing the issue in a disagreement, and to continue the issue in the dimensions of insult by personalizing it. We can say that the issue of how to experience every joy and sadness in life forms the backbone of the education that the family can give. In fact, what we do is not what we say; Isn't it important how we articulate them and our stances and behaviors that we put forward without feeling that they are worthless?

Despite everything, it is very pleasing that some of the main elements still exist in our traditional family structure. The attitude of even the most insensitive people, when appropriate, brings tears to the eyes. I would like to give a striking example of this situation. An old lady wants to go to church on the weekend and hitchhikes on the road. She buys a car and takes him to the place he wants. However, she also asks herself for the price of this trip, she. The situation is different when the same woman experiences this situation through the vehicle of a Muslim individual. The Muslim man does not want anything from the old lady.

Considering that one of the patterns that shape us is our spiritual values ​​and beliefs, it is not possible to disagree with this interpretation. Despite the partial corruption, Islam stands out as the most valuable solution today, as it was in the past, for our planet to consist of happier people and more peaceful societies.

It is possible for people living under the influence of different elements to evolve into the name of good and beautiful. We are not just us. We have obligations and responsibilities both to ourselves and to others, and others to us. Being able to live in solidarity and paying the price knowingly and believingly will have good results for the future of all of us. Although it is not possible to achieve this all at once, I think great names will be made when healthy relationships are established, people try to understand each other correctly and can express themselves in the simplest way.

Isn't it more constructive to see it as essentially good and beautiful, rather than making a distinction between all bad and all good people? Since the rules of the majority force us to act that way. Isn't it worth making these rules more humane, more just and setting an example for a brighter tomorrow? Isn't that what we call social conformity behavior? Just like a butterfly effect. How the favors increase and affect the masses. Isn't this format that we call life, that surrounds and surrounds each of us from all sides? Why should we live it with persecution? Why see the weeping oppressed, why watch the drama of the despised people, why?

Who will change the environment we live in or this container and pattern that we are trying to articulate at the beginning of the word? Who will evolve in the desired way and direction?...Of course we, each of us. It will affect one of us, ten of us, he of ten of us, … and we will be able to live a more desirable future together. We cannot achieve this with mistakes, arrogance, deceit and hypocrisy. Each of us must break and reshape his own container. The power to achieve this is always in the essence of man. It wasn't what you were that mattered. What we should be.