I support the Miner Fund because it's a survivor plan that it can save us not just from funding issues but from bad actors. Nothing more frustrating than seeing the project you love and you thought that it can help save the world struggling. Not easy to see the project you kept talking to your friend about being in internal fight over funding, color, leadership and many other things.
I can't hide that I think this have been mostly caused by one member of the society that it sets now on the top of the ABC project. Do you know this man, I've got to know him a bit so let me tells you about him.
Amaury sechet, his biggest supporters are Jonald Fyookball, Antony Zegers "Mengerian", Marco Costa #977 , Cain#106 and Wecx
His enemies are: Bitcoin BU his competitors, Roger Ver and any one who disagree with him.
Stroing data on the block chain issue
First time I noticed his hostile personality when he started attacking Roger because he heard that Roger is going to allow to store files on the block chain by removing the soft cap, that was picked by BSV people and was presented as a split in BCH community.
The Development Fund issue
Somehow there was something called Bitcoin Cash development fund that was created by David R. Allen and others, Amuary explain the issue like this:
The original plan was to do a combiend campaign with antiwar.com . People could donate to antiwar and part of the donation would fund bch infra and part wculd go to antiwar. It was a good way to promote communities that have a lot of commonalities to each others, plus antiwar has all the setup required for compliance.
Roger changed everything last minute to create the whole competition between implementation.
This caused compliance problem because nobody was ready to recieve fund in that form. There are many laws regarding this, in addition, there are good practices that banks and lawyers expect you to comply with, even if not strictly required (grey area).
I'm not sure what rule David R. Allen plays in antiwar.com but seems like he share the ideology at least.
The Australia Meeting
Amaury was prasing the BCH city conference in Australia and he seems to have enjoyed it so much.
One person asked why a lot of people have changed their attitude toward other community members after the conference, Amuray answered:
People figured out that all the noise came from a handful of doofus who don't even build anything.
Semyon Germanovich said later:
There was bit of BU bashing there but it was pretty subtle
Later Jonald said:
Funny all the builders were there mostly. All the trouble makers stayed home
Amaury agreed and said:
Yes, this is what happened in Townsville. Add on top of that, the bitter realization from the builder of how much shit they are putting up with, which naturaly comes with decreased willingness to do so.
When Amaury was asked if their attitude change was because of his effort to convince them Jonald responded:
yes, good leaders make unclear things more clear for the community. i try to do that in my articles.
Which Amuray seems to have agreed to.
End of Part 1
Thanks for this information, is always useful to get more clarity on what is going on behind the mind of the people that is directing this project. Hope part two clear even more things that are going on with BCH leaders.