The Differences between history and pre-history

0 16
Avatar for Basahinako1
3 years ago

We know a lot about pre-history because archaeologists have succeeded in digging into what people have left behind, just as we know about missing animals from their fossils found.

So, the dead people left their houses, and the pictures they painted on the walls of the cave, but they did not sign it because they did not have a letter. So we can identify the hand-print of a little girl but we do not know her name.

That is pre-history. Then came history. Things are together, and a man who ends his life in Britain and marries a local girl meets a man born in Libya who remembers his village there, because his wife's tombstone is in Britain . How do we know? Because his name is also written.

That is a fragment of a memory and can be awry, but it is the kind of thing that makes history. Someone writes the details. It may have been 4000 years ago but someone sat there and wrote something we see.

The emotional handwriting of a girl 60,000 years ago can speak a lot, but an example of a piece of homework a child 3000 years ago contains information from where we can develop a more detailed and solid picture of his life. Or someone like Herodotus could write history.

Of course there are many more who make history, and the work of archaeologists is still relevant. But where they may be somewhat running in pre-history they are on solid ground in history. Because of writing.

We know a lot about pre-history because archaeologists have succeeded in digging into what people have left behind, just as we know about missing animals from their fossils found.

So, the dead people left their houses, and the pictures they painted on the walls of the cave, but they did not sign it because they did not have a letter. So we can identify the hand-print of a little girl but we do not know her name.

That is pre-history. Then came history. Things are together, and a man who ends his life in Britain and marries a local girl meets a man born in Libya who remembers his village there, because his wife's tombstone is in Britain . How do we know? Because his name is also written.

That is a fragment of a memory and can be awry, but it is the kind of thing that makes history. Someone writes the details. It may have been 4000 years ago but someone sat there and wrote something we see.

The emotional handwriting of a girl 60,000 years ago can speak a lot, but an example of a piece of homework a child 3000 years ago contains information from where we can develop a more detailed and solid picture of his life. Or someone like Herodotus could write history.

Of course there are many more who make history, and the work of archaeologists is still relevant. But where they may be somewhat running in pre-history they are on solid ground in history. Because of writing.

We know a lot about pre-history because archaeologists have succeeded in digging into what people have left behind, just as we know about missing animals from their fossils found.

So, the dead people left their houses, and the pictures they painted on the walls of the cave, but they did not sign it because they did not have a letter. So we can identify the hand-print of a little girl but we do not know her name.

That is pre-history. Then came history. Things are together, and a man who ends his life in Britain and marries a local girl meets a man born in Libya who remembers his village there, because his wife's tombstone is in Britain . How do we know? Because his name is also written.

That is a fragment of a memory and can be awry, but it is the kind of thing that makes history. Someone writes the details. It may have been 4000 years ago but someone sat there and wrote something we see.

The emotional handwriting of a girl 60,000 years ago can speak a lot, but an example of a piece of homework a child 3000 years ago contains information from where we can develop a more detailed and solid picture of his life. Or someone like Herodotus could write history.

Of course there are many more who make history, and the work of archaeologists is still relevant. But where they may be somewhat running in pre-history they are on solid ground in history. Because of writing.

We know a lot about pre-history because archaeologists have succeeded in digging into what people have left behind, just as we know about missing animals from their fossils found.

So, the dead people left their houses, and the pictures they painted on the walls of the cave, but they did not sign it because they did not have a letter. So we can identify the hand-print of a little girl but we do not know her name.

That is pre-history. Then came history. Things are together, and a man who ends his life in Britain and marries a local girl meets a man born in Libya who remembers his village there, because his wife's tombstone is in Britain . How do we know? Because his name is also written.

That is a fragment of a memory and can be awry, but it is the kind of thing that makes history. Someone writes the details. It may have been 4000 years ago but someone sat there and wrote something we see.

The emotional handwriting of a girl 60,000 years ago can speak a lot, but an example of a piece of homework a child 3000 years ago contains information from where we can develop a more detailed and solid picture of his life. Or someone like Herodotus could write history.

Of course there are many more who make history, and the work of archaeologists is still relevant. But where they may be somewhat running in pre-history they are on solid ground in history. Because of writing.

We know a lot about pre-history because archaeologists have succeeded in digging into what people have left behind, just as we know about missing animals from their fossils found.

So, the dead people left their houses, and the pictures they painted on the walls of the cave, but they did not sign it because they did not have a letter. So we can identify the hand-print of a little girl but we do not know her name.

That is pre-history. Then came history. Things are together, and a man who ends his life in Britain and marries a local girl meets a man born in Libya who remembers his village there, because his wife's tombstone is in Britain . How do we know? Because his name is also written.

That is a fragment of a memory and can be awry, but it is the kind of thing that makes history. Someone writes the details. It may have been 4000 years ago but someone sat there and wrote something we see.

The emotional handwriting of a girl 60,000 years ago can speak a lot, but an example of a piece of homework a child 3000 years ago contains information from where we can develop a more detailed and solid picture of his life. Or someone like Herodotus could write history.

Of course there are many more who make history, and the work of archaeologists is still relevant. But where they may be somewhat running in pre-history they are on solid ground in history. Because of writing.

We know a lot about pre-history because archaeologists have succeeded in digging into what people have left behind, just as we know about missing animals from their fossils found.

So, the dead people left their houses, and the pictures they painted on the walls of the cave, but they did not sign it because they did not have a letter. So we can identify the hand-print of a little girl but we do not know her name.

That is pre-history. Then came history. Things are together, and a man who ends his life in Britain and marries a local girl meets a man born in Libya who remembers his village there, because his wife's tombstone is in Britain . How do we know? Because his name is also written.

That is a fragment of a memory and can be awry, but it is the kind of thing that makes history. Someone writes the details. It may have been 4000 years ago but someone sat there and wrote something we see.

The emotional handwriting of a girl 60,000 years ago can speak a lot, but an example of a piece of homework a child 3000 years ago contains information from where we can develop a more detailed and solid picture of his life. Or someone like Herodotus could write history.

Of course there are many more who make history, and the work of archaeologists is still relevant. But where they may be somewhat running in pre-history they are on solid ground in history. Because of writing.

We know a lot about pre-history because archaeologists have succeeded in digging into what people have left behind, just as we know about missing animals from their fossils found.

So, the dead people left their houses, and the pictures they painted on the walls of the cave, but they did not sign it because they did not have a letter. So we can identify the hand-print of a little girl but we do not know her name.

That is pre-history. Then came history. Things are together, and a man who ends his life in Britain and marries a local girl meets a man born in Libya who remembers his village there, because his wife's tombstone is in Britain . How do we know? Because his name is also written.

That is a fragment of a memory and can be awry, but it is the kind of thing that makes history. Someone writes the details. It may have been 4000 years ago but someone sat there and wrote something we see.

The emotional handwriting of a girl 60,000 years ago can speak a lot, but an example of a piece of homework a child 3000 years ago contains information from where we can develop a more detailed and solid picture of his life. Or someone like Herodotus could write history.

Of course there are many more who make history, and the work of archaeologists is still relevant. But where they may be somewhat running in pre-history they are on solid ground in history. Because of writing.

We know a lot about pre-history because archaeologists have succeeded in digging into what people have left behind, just as we know about missing animals from their fossils found.

So, the dead people left their houses, and the pictures they painted on the walls of the cave, but they did not sign it because they did not have a letter. So we can identify the hand-print of a little girl but we do not know her name.

That is pre-history. Then came history. Things are together, and a man who ends his life in Britain and marries a local girl meets a man born in Libya who remembers his village there, because his wife's tombstone is in Britain . How do we know? Because his name is also written.

That is a fragment of a memory and can be awry, but it is the kind of thing that makes history. Someone writes the details. It may have been 4000 years ago but someone sat there and wrote something we see.

2
$ 0.02
$ 0.02 from @TheRandomRewarder
Avatar for Basahinako1
3 years ago

Comments