"How would you know if your articles are good and interesting?"

Before the major changes in read.cash point system, presently know as the random rewarder, you can't really tell if the articles you published in the platforms are stimulating and/or interactive to readers simply because comments and likes are often added for the sake of gaining points only not because they are seeing through the quality contents of output or the level of impact to one's scrutiny. Sad and disappointing reality.

The establishment of the random rewarder lets you assess the acceptability and overall impression of the readers towards your work. Every comments, likes and upvotes are meaningful, so you can actually conclude that once a comment is added in the article, it is true and that they really appreciate your work. Just imagine, people are still interacting even without corresponding points in return. It feels a lot different than before.

I read one article here that talks about her rants and disappointment to the new system because she's not gaining points and she also lost her confidence because there are no more comments or likes in her articles.

It disgusts me reading the said post. How could they blame read.cash for their irresponsibility and not exerting enough efforts to their works? It is their fault for continue publishing gibberish contents.

As for me, I'm happy because I'm still receiving comments and upvotes.

All I can say is that if you create good writings, you'll also entice readers and stimulates interaction.

Don't expect to earn more than what you deserve. It's not how it works!

Anyway, let's just enjoy the platform while seeing spams and cheaters wave their goodbyes.