Is Crypto about money and wealth ?

Some say Crypto is about money and wealth? Money and wealth. If examined both contain questions that will answer the contents of both. Before continuing, I will remind you that this will take a lot of questions if asked as if it will never run out because it will be like going back and forth in the end.

Talk about money.

Money, being a noun that is meant to be so important in human life, but the question that is embedded is whether money is more important than food? Then accompanied by the word "about", which explains the purpose of the question from the word "money". About money? in the end will make a broad thinking about the elaboration of the question. Which in essence is embedded in life, of course, because this question comes from the sentence "Crypto is about money and wealth". It's not about what money means in life, because this is different from the narrative.

Money is also about procedures, learning, recognition, control, origins, and so on that will rise to the surface in human life. Which in the end presents or forms many uses, even though the point is only one as a means of transaction that is recognized, he said, in the type of life of one variety that is lived by humans in life in this current era.

Talk about Wealth.

For this word, it may be easier to interpret and group the purpose of the questions presented. Because it explains everything from the connotation of "wealth" to question. Where you will get clear answers to the purpose and meaning of all the questions that are present.

However, even after all, it will still cause many different reactions because this is about the order of one's life through life. Which means it's the same as not having an answer where each will be the alignment of the purpose of the meaning of the sentence that is in question. Because it is formed from each party or the characteristics that carry out or the decision maker, thoughts or attitudes or intentions.

Looks like the question is so easy to answer but difficult to explain isn't it? Because when we read it, the form of the question sentence is so simple. When clarified it becomes an advice, a reminder or anything that aims at the good that is presented or expected. But even though it's so simple, it's not easy to answer because it contains the meaning of life. Where life is so vast and never stops like time that keeps spinning.

In essence, it can be taken to mean that being kind with good procedures will produce good things. Maybe globally that's the interpretation of the sentence. But whether they are the same or not, right or wrong, it's up to those concerned, of course.

Returning to the connotation of creativity, it can be said that there is no definite or precise answer to this question. We can give an example for these words, global convenience and stability. But the limiting factor is infinite where each has a view of the meaning of wealth at the point they desire. For that reason, I don't want to change or write it in the form as it is, or it can't be translated into other languages because according to many people, the meaning will change later. Whether it is understandable or not, in the end it has an impact on each party who stops by and tries to find out what existence is being discussed this time by each party.

So what is the truth in the form of the crypto narrative of money and wealth? Convenience, procedures, formations, or just discourse. Even if all of that is clear, now its use is clear, but is it true that the form of the meaning of money and wealth can be stated correctly? Maybe one side will say that wealth is relative and money can definitely be said to be the right counterpart to crypto. But why is crypto still struggling against all of that?

It seems that only for some parties, not for the whole public anymore that crypto was created isn't it. And that is the source of the reality of today's human economic harmony.

-==-