Exercising California’s CCPA With Facebook: Part II

0 18

Written by

Admiral

From the raw affluence of war the true nature of man within all cries for sanctuary.

1 year ago

Exercising My Rights Utilizing The CCP? — Why Not? Here’s Why-TO.

Photo by Solen Feyissa on Unsplash

It should be common sense I’d figure. Rights are like muscles. If you don’t exercise them— they will go away, leaving you weak and defenseless.

Very good way to put it.

And you can think of the industrial complex like, a demon. And there are different kinds.

Some are fat, some are small.

They all want to tempt you and get you stuck with them,

but none of them want to empower you.

In order to gain your trust they have to claim to desire so, and appear to do so, but it’s all party tricks behind the curtain and although I’ve never been behind the scenes … I’m pretty good at telling the plot by the preview.

I thought we all could do that. No? Well. That’s fine.
Allow me to relay the spoiler alert:

All companies by default — MUST grow.

They MUST grow.

If a business is not growing then it is failing and “dying”.

If it’s at a standstill it is plummeting the toilet bowl.

Managers get fired and CEOs get the boot.

So a company by default, is a lot like a tumor. For those who don’t know a tumor is cancerous buildup of cancerous cells. Cells become cancerous through irritation of toxicity, malnutrition, dehydration, or (according to social modern meme), “social media posts”.

https://imgur.com/user/Dreamare Spiderman being a goofball but also making a suggestive subconscious programming of cancer mentality.

Zero width embed

And actually we find that — although posts don’t just go and give a person cancer like that —mentality does have an effect on one’s health as it is specifically what directs ones actions upon their life, and to claim “complete conscious control” is like claiming human beings don’t have a subconscious mind.

Not only is it unscientific to claim, but it’s also hint to the visibly-grammatically show of cognitive denial via comfort vs. discomfort of belief structures, which is a theme entirely of my interest when it comes to psychological aspects pertaining my data — on Facebook — a company which collects user-data based on reaction or indifference show to social-political effect given as psychological stimulus in measure to what categorical data can be (is) quarried in specific response.

A mouthful, I know. They probably said it better (as in, less defined so easier to be said while simultaneously allowing for vaguely legal treading-grounds to play on.)

This is completely a perfect example of a well-rounded theme “cancer as a mentality — and destructive and unwanted in general to the authentic of us.) being elemental in each aspecting attribute of dimension which we might staple it on.

business — must grow at all costs/ ignore the individual’s rights;
individual — must attain money at all costs/ ignore other individuals;
cells — must take in at all costs/ ignore the needs of other neighbor cells;
social media account — aaaaaaaah, now we’re getting somewhere.

[easy mode]

“A rose does not grow off a thistle, a grape does not grow off a thorn.” — Jesus Christ, Gospel of Thomas

[hard mode]

In being stuck in the dynamic of the foregrounded mentality, we see that the business by default provides a platform which is limited to exactly that mentality’s produced attributes, and in structured repose. (It need not do a thing in order for that fabric of dynamic to exist, and affect other dimensions of aspects — its form itself begets of the same.)

That is such a gruesome fallacy just waiting to drop on all of us.

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA) allows for the requested info as stated:

“You may request that businesses disclose to you what personal information they have collected, used, shared, or sold about you, and why they collected, used, shared, or sold that information. Specifically, you may request that businesses disclose:

The categories of personal information collected
Specific pieces of personal information collected
The categories of sources from which the business collected personal information
The purposes for which the business uses the personal information
The categories of third parties with whom the business shares the personal information
The categories of information that the business sells or discloses to third parties.”

[source.I,source.II]

Facebook
October 16th, 2020| 5:54 PM

“Hi,

Thanks for contacting us. It looks like you’re asking a question where we have provided you with the required information. Of course, you can always access specific information about your activity on Facebook, including your posts, photos, reactions, comments and messages, as well as other information, through our Access Your Information tool: https://www.facebook.com/ccpa/access_your_information/. You can also download a copy of information you’ve provided to Facebook using the Download Your Information tool: https://www.facebook.com/ccpa/download_your_information/.

Learn more about how we collect, use, and share information by reading our Data Policy (https://www.facebook.com/privacy/explanation) and California Privacy Notice (https://www.facebook.com/legal/policy/ccpa). If you have another question or concern, please visit Facebook Privacy Basics (https://www.facebook.com/about/basics) for additional information.

Thanks,
The Facebook Team”

My response:

October 16th, 2020 | 7:07 PM

You are praying I’m ignorant aren’t you. Sorry to say, I am not, and your a bit pushing past that deadline to get me my data requested. As we reference here: https://www.pnas.org/content/111/24/8788.full , the science paper published in the PNAS -”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America”, titled: “Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks” — a historical event we all recall (do you remember that? I remember that.), we see exactly the manners in which data through social experimental procedure had been used by Facebook, and pertaining emotional-stimulus related effect of the users of Facebook.
Here’s The Guardian writing about it https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/29/facebook-users-emotions-news-feeds ,
and here’s Forbes mentioning the “research” section added to the Facebook User Agreement — which I am obviously inquiring into my personal data Facebook has, in order to obtain exactly that data. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2014/06/30/facebook-only-got-permission-to-do-research-on-users-after-emotional-manipulation-study/#25c8c51b7a62.

That is what I want, I don’t mind you leaving out the data of everyone else so long as I receive my data. I’m a shy guy. And I stutter on camera. But I’ve never had over $10,000 in my life before and I think the courts might be able to get me more than that? Surely there’s interested lawyers. I will find one. Please keep my data nice and tidy for me until I get back. Oh and, the CCPA clearly states the no bullying or punishment of users for asking for their data, so. You can stop doing that now.”