Actually that tweet he made was very good, because the standard "treatment" for Covd19, (Remdesivir), was apparently killing more people than it helped.
Ohh yea. Tell me about it. I told my friends, the vaccine may kill ya, the treatment may kill ya and the test may kill ya. So you decide. Some saw me as a nut job but they're slowly realising that I might be right. I think among these three, the treatment is the most reliable killer.
I agree. Which is insane, (and EVIL!), because safe, effective treatments, such as Ivermectin, and Vitamin C, D, and Zinc, exist. Remdesivir seems to make the problems worse. Makes me wonder what the f*ck is going on at the CDC and the NIH.
I sorta agree with you. I do think the CDC and NIH can still serve some good, but it now has to be mixed in with the harm they are causing for political purposes.
Yea I agree with that. In a way it'll be lot easier if they're just evil. When they're partially good it opens up the slippery slope of moral relativism.
Log in to join inReading is open to everyone. Replying needs an account.
6 comments
Actually that tweet he made was very good, because the standard "treatment" for Covd19, (Remdesivir), was apparently killing more people than it helped.
Ohh yea. Tell me about it. I told my friends, the vaccine may kill ya, the treatment may kill ya and the test may kill ya. So you decide. Some saw me as a nut job but they're slowly realising that I might be right. I think among these three, the treatment is the most reliable killer.
I agree. Which is insane, (and EVIL!), because safe, effective treatments, such as Ivermectin, and Vitamin C, D, and Zinc, exist. Remdesivir seems to make the problems worse. Makes me wonder what the f*ck is going on at the CDC and the NIH.
CDC or NIH or any governmental agency for health is just a political tool at this point. They have nothing to do with health.
I sorta agree with you. I do think the CDC and NIH can still serve some good, but it now has to be mixed in with the harm they are causing for political purposes.
Yea I agree with that. In a way it'll be lot easier if they're just evil. When they're partially good it opens up the slippery slope of moral relativism.