read.cash Log in

@saddit42

Joined 19 November 2019 · 2 posts

120 KT

0 KT · $18.55 received · 0 KT · $70.40 given

Posts

@saddit42

The lazyfox.io beta v2 has just launched! Earn Bitcoin Cash for answering Questions I'm excited to announce that as of now the https://lazyfox.io beta v2 has launched. Thanks to all the feedback received for the lauch of the first version this has been a major upgrade with many important and essential features added over the last year. These features include: Ability to create tasks that can receive multiple solutions and reward up to 100 users Users can contribute to tasks of other users A voting system which works for tasks, solutions and comments The comment system is completely reworked and now supports hierachical comments ordered by votes Tasks, solutions and comments can be liked A fulltext search to find tasks and solutions A completely new user interface with mobile view and dark mode These features give users a powerful tool to gather information from the crowd and delegate tasks to people who have deep knowledge on a specific topic. Also it's a great way for people to earn Bitcoin Cash. To celebrate this launch we're giving away Bitcoin Cash to read.cash users! Claim it here: https://lazyfox.io/task/rpg/post-a-comment-under-the-lazyfox-read-cash-article I'm looking forward to see you on the platform, asking questions, creating tasks, and earning some BCH!

@saddit42

My main reason to oppose the IFP FWIW here's the ~10000th article about the IFP. For now I only saw Jonald Fyookball making this point and as I think it's the most important reason to oppose the fund I'll expand on it a bit: Blockchains are social coordination tools and their incorruptible properties are not magically forming out of nowhere but are emerging from certain strong agreements on simple truths shared by the people supporting and using them. For this to work and be resilient against corruption and capture these truths must be easy and somewhat absolute/pure so they can not get more and more corrupted over time until they've completely vanished. One such simple truth is: There will never be more than 21 million coins! Who cares if miners change it to be 21.0000001? Me! because breaking that magic number would open the doors for endless inflation. It is not that miners wouldn't technically be able to change that limit and force higher block rewards with a 51% hashrate majority.. no, it's the fact that big parts of the community agree on this simple truth that would make it very hard, even for a hashrate majority, to get something like this pushed through. Another simple truth for me always was that blocks will not get censored by a 51% majority because they contain transactions that - while otherwise being perfectly valid - do not pay money to the right set of people! This is terrible.. and a very important line would've been crossed! How about orphaning the spending of some hacked coins next time? sounds reasonable.. or not? So if we now orphaned blocks with tx that spend hacked coins, why not also freeze money of criminals? These are all things miners could rightfully decide with their Hashrate.. But I think it would be a very stupid decision and it would certainly lower my excitement for such a project.