@idiosyncratic1 26 February 2021 more from that month

Yo, sorry for late ^^ Let me share my point of view over the renoise incentive model: The feature of renoise was quite necessary for engagement among users to increase. Now, with the increasing number of users, it will be way easier to interact with people. Well done. On the other hand, though there must be an incentive for the renoisers, the allocation of reward should not be above 30/70 ration. WHY? The higher the renoise rewards for the ones who share the post again, the less number quality noises as Renoise is eaiser and quite profitable, as well. On the other hand, the higher reward that the noise-makers get, the more useful posts are likely to be created. Imagine that you create a nice content that is appreciated and renoised. You both directly and indirectly keep receiving tips thanks to the unique post. I believe in this way the platform may push the users to be more authentic (let's use the word authentic to expand the scale of perception of quality 😌) TL;DR Renoise should be less rewarding to be more attractive for people to create authentic posts on the platform. Otherwise, we may be exposed to thousands of renoises to receive tips in a easier way ^^ #NoiseCash