@Stea
more from that month
Some nerve for a country where policemen finds it correct to bend their knees on civilians and not do anything about mass shooting to lecture other countries on 'Human Rights Violation'. Nobody knows who made you the watch dog, or the class monitor? Some people needs to understand the meaning of a 2 + 2 dialogue. Btw, we live in 2022 now, some countries unlike others have an independent foreign policy. Thank you for listening to my afternoon rant. Im not open to discussions. Good night!
2 comments
As long as human rights are violated in country a, country b will point it out. The only way to avoid another country pointing out this is to have no human rights violation. This is just two violators trying to say they are the lesser of the two evils.
Part of the problem on the "police" issue is that it is not a major problem, yet it gets the most attention, while thousands of black men die at the hands of other black men on the streets of Chicago. No one bats an eye when a five year old black child gets caught in the crosshairs and killed by two black gangbangers in a shootout over territory. I know that your comment was not necessarily directly related to the police issue, but at the same time we also have to keep in mind that in every single case of a black man being killed by a cop, the man killed was a career criminal who was having a potentially deadly interaction with the police BECAUSE he was engaged in criminal activity. Does it make it right? No. But that's part of a 2+2 dialogue in situations like this as well. If a black man obeys the law the chances of him being killed by a cop is reduced to zero. What's more, the REAL statistic is that more white people are killed by cops than blacks. But that never gets any attention because you can't push the fake racism narrative.