Many new coins/tokens in the market since 2017. Some of them also offering peer-to-peer and low fees on transactions/payments. Seems that they are to be a competitor to BCH but in fact, they are not... BCH has no owner or not belong to a commercial company. Totally decentralized. Others are mostly centralized and have a company/team behind that coin/token. They can say that their coin/token is decentralized but I experienced before, all decentralized coins/tokens which are connected to a team or a company are exactly very centralized team structure or company structure. Here is my old content in read.cash about this case. https://read.cash/@SnowUnderSun/centralized-team-structures-in-decentralized-crypto-projects-9f46a8d8 How can you trust to a centralized team/company will not change rules for using their token/coin after it reached their usage target? They can increase fees or anything else in a centralized structure. On the other hand, BCH is totally decentralized. No owner and no planned tricks. It is pure and simple payment instrument. Nobody can change the rules while the match is playing. Yeah, we saw civil war in BCH previously and we also testify how BCH stays strong in that forks. If you need a proven and reliable payment model, BCH is fit for you.
Log in to join in Reading is open to everyone. Replying needs an account.
No comments yet