@PanteraOnNoiseApp 15 November 2021 more from that month

I can’t write in favor of something I don’t believe in, so I can’t write favorable articles to Bitcoin-BTC. I write about what I see after research, and most of those that write about BTC are trying to hide various drawbacks just because they get more followers, viewers, and perhaps income this way. Maybe I could have had thousands of followers if I had just written favorably to BTC. Still, this is not me. I can’t deceive newcomers and make articles just to please investors of BTC. It would be unethical. It would be like all those talking about the bags pumping and writing songs of the type: “please bitcoin go to the moon”. Since there is not a lot more in BTC, just narratives seasonally adjusted to fit any kind of geopolitical and economic changes or disasters. These writers try to make any case look good for BTC. They write against the SEC for not allowing a BTC spot-ETF and praise the decision for the futures-ETF. Nothing to do though, with utility or the network of BTC. Bitcoin maxis were praising Musk for accepting BTC as payment for Tesla cars. How many cars did Tesla sell for BTC, anyway? Probably zero. Nobody is using BTC as money. For every maxi out there, fiat is their king. They are all just there to make more fiat. Just ask Pomp, which promoted Bitcoin pizza but did not use BTC as a payments option… What I see from BTC authors on medium, Twitter, Reddit, and, any platform, is a long discussion on the price going up, speculators, traders and casino gambling degenerates. What can one write about BTC? That it can change El Salvador and make it a better economy? It can’t since just some politicians pocketed hefty lobbying BTC from a few whales to force a centralized LN wallet on merchants and the population.