@Ozzyy
more from that month
After weeks of trying to nderstand the Random Rewarder's algorithm, I have come to the conclusion that it is indeed, random. It's not always about the upvotes we get, since some of my articles with small upvotes earned way more tips than others with big upvotes. Then again, it isn't about the length because some of my 6 - 7 minute articles didn't make an equally 'long' amount of tips XD. I guess it's just a game of luck, keeping posting regularly and remember to interact with other writers!
11 comments
Very true. TheRandomRewarder is living up his name.😂
Exactly ;-D
I made a lot of profit when I was posting continuously. The benefit of payments stopped when I stopped posting daily. I lost that benefit and am trying to get it back. The robot no longer gives me points for my old posts. Although yesterday he did it several times, today he has not given me anything. It's like starting over.
Yeah, I think it's easier to get upvotes when you post regularly and as such, people begin to read your work more/
Yes. And I also realized that the more you comment, the more they take you into account. Some weight has the comments on the benefits that the robot gives you.
Perhaps that's the case as well.
Thanks your for sharing what observed. Really appreciate that 😊
It definitely is random but as for whatever earns upvotes. I still do think the interactions still play an equally huge role in this as it always has. Comments determine what is interesting, after all
Yes. The comments, likes, and so on. Interaction really plays a huge role, because there are no other criteria that can really do it.
Yup and a bot can't really tell what's interesting or not to begin with so it's really impossible to rule those parts out
Exactly. Engagements will have to determine what's interesting.