@GeneralProtocols
edited
GP Statement on "CHIPs: Processes for consensus changes"
CHIPs: Processes for consensus changes https://gitlab.com/im_uname/cash-improvement-proposals/-/blob/master/CHIPs.md Version for this statement: b9214b1 https://gitlab.com/im_uname/cash-improvement-proposals/-/blob/b9214b1911ccf9c3730a65ce3428b9622369d436/CHIPs.md Summary Statement https://read.cash/@GeneralProtocols/gp-statement-on-chip-2021-02-add-native-introspection-opcodes-1acb5582#summary-statement This CHIP has two main elements. 1) A meta-proposal for a structure that future CHIPs can use - GP fully supports a structure along these lines and has published a similar template that is descended from discussions with im_uname. 2) A meta-proposal for a schedule that future CHIPs can use - GP agrees with the reasons presented and will adhere to the proposed process in the absence of a better alternative. https://gitlab.com/GeneralProtocols/research/chips/-/blob/master/Example-CHIP-Template.md Minor Recommendations for Improvement GP submitted a number of minor fixes, clarifications and adjustments that went through reasonable discussion and acceptance or rejection. GP appreciates the constructive engagement. The only remaining concern is the exclusive focus on developers as rare resources. GP's position is that in most cases, CHIPs require a multi-disciplinary team where each contributing member brings rare and valuable talent to the table such as software development, protocol design, documentation, organization and public communication. ****General Protocols Blog**** This article forms part of the **General Protocols Blog**, a collection of cross-platform links showcasing our team's community activity, Bitcoin Cash projects, UTXO development, and general crypto musings. https://blog.generalprotocols.com/
No comments yet