Two days ago, I've asked a question about the rule change of noise.cash. This can be read in here: https://noise.cash/post/l9qv44n7 Here is my view on the matter: 1. The money comes from the noise.cash team, so it is their project, and they can decide to do what they want to do with it. No harsh feelings on the decision. 2. They want to prove that BCH is scalable and can be suited for different applications, especially if compared with BTC - it is faster than BTC. 3. As already said, the project owner can decide how the platform is built and how funds are distributed. That the active users coming from other projects and who write about other cryptos, is a risk that needs to be taken in account. I know a lot of good writers that will stop being active. 4. Will it stop spammers? Probably no, it might incentive the creation of multiaccounts that plagiarise content and share the tips. 5. noise.cash is not decentralized, keep that in mind. Crypto does not mean decentralized, even if I like it or not. 6. I will probably remain active, as I like to read also new infos outside my crypto circle.