Nigeria Donors and civil society groups spend tens of millions of dollars every year trying to combat corruption. They do it because corruption has been shown to increase poverty and inequality while **undermining trust in the government**. Reducing corruption is essential to improve public services and strengthen the social contract between citizens and the state. https://www.wfd.org/2020/05/27/political-trust-the-glue-that-keeps-democracies-together/ But what if anti-corruption efforts actually make the situation worse? Our **research** in Lagos, Nigeria, found that anti-corruption messages often have an unintended effect. Instead of building public resolve to reject corrupt acts, the messages we tested either had no effect or actually made people more likely to offer a bribe. https://ace.soas.ac.uk/publication/unintended-consequences-of-anti-corruption-messaging-in-nigeria/ The reason may be that the messages reinforce popular perceptions that corruption is pervasive and insurmountable. In doing so, they encourage apathy and acceptance rather than inspire activism.
