@thesotiris 14 December 2024 more from that month

The great evil of the 'lesser evil': How the Devil corrupts the virtuous

Did you ever feel cornered, forced to choose between only two calamities? Did you feel like you’d rather take a punch in the face than a knife in the gut? Do you prefer the lesser evil over the greater one? Fine. I can understand that... We have all been guilty of choosing an arbitrarily defined “lesser” evil - an evil that is lesser for us, perhaps, but not for others. I say ‘guilty’ because we are never innocent for choosing any level of evil, despite our self-righteous excuses. Besides, the lesser evil implies a false dichotomy… and there is always a third choice, and fourth one. Beyond a false dichotomy of only two choices lie other choices - principled ones - that we are too cowardly and weak to consider. Even *not* choosing is a valid choice. Even choosing both options of a false dichotomy can be an alternative. Yet we choose the most **convenient evil** because it suits us to deem it the “lesser” evil, never pausing to ask ourselves “*lesser for whom?*” And this implies that we trust our mental capacities enough to accurately discern which of two evils is actually lesser, and by whose standard. The problem with choosing the lesser evil is that **we lose sense of what is good**. We forget that the lesser evil is still evil (assuming it is indeed the least possible evil we can choose). If we feel **morally justified for choosing an evil** - albeit a lesser one - we become morally corrupt, since **we confuse lesser evil with good**. The **greatest evil is the lesser evil** because it corrupts the virtuous. The ‘lesser evil’ makes choosing evil seem good. The twisted thought process behind the ‘lesser evil’ psychopathy is **utilitarian Marxism** - the sick notion that *any* atrocity is somehow “justified” as long as someone’s convenient definition of an arbitrary “greater good” may perhaps be achieved. No evidence is required as to what constitutes evil lesser or greater (and for whom).

Proponents of the ‘lesser evil’ insist that, if you keep choosing the lesser of the two, you’ll keep minimizing evil… and in time, you’ll make evil disappear. Yet, the opposite occurs… Evil presents itself as “lesser” when it threatens you with an even ‘greater evil.’ Classic good-cop-bad-cop routine… So, evil wins. Evil is perpetuated and maximized specifically *because* of our justification and sanctification of the “lesser” evil. The Devil wins when we *willingly* choose evil, and then excuse ourselves that it is somehow “lesser.” When we consider ourselves good for choosing evil - even a “lesser” one, we corrupt the meaning of ‘good,’ and **we can’t even tell what is good anymore**. We do evil, then pat ourselves on the back for choosing the “lesser” one. It is precisely this excusing of evil that corrupts us beyond redemption. It is the lesser evil’s waiving of moral accountability that erodes all that is good. Evil stops when we refuse to choose between the false dichotomy of cartoonish “greater” and “lesser” evils. Not choosing any evil is a viable third option - always - but it requires sacrifices most are unwilling to make. You can choose no evil. It’s just that we’re too blind and cowardly to admit it. The lesser evil is not good; it’s just the most *convenient* evil. Thank you for reading. I appreciate your time. Kindly like, comment, share, or subscribe for free… or not. It’s all the same.