Transcript [Roger Ver & Joel Valenzuela Discuss the Upcoming BCH Fork by BitcoinABC]
Hello everyone. ITS my first transcript article and its requires a lot of time to edit but i forget to ask permissions from @RogerVer soo please pardon mee sir if youre seeing my article. The transcript is done from a video when @RogerVer and Joel Valenzuela Discuss the Upcoming BCH Fork by BitcoinABC. ****EDIT: I DONT KNOW WHY THERE IS NO EXC MARK IN MY VIDEO I HAVE COPIED THESE TRANSCRIPTS FROM MY NOTEPAD BECAUSE IF I WRITE THE WHOLE TRANSCRIPT IN READ.CASH SO ITS VERY LAGGY.**** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gdqzUd0EdY Transcript from here **00:00** [Music] **00:03** universal healthcare that sounds **00:04** wonderful but when you look at what **00:05** universal healthcare actually is it's **00:07** just a euphemism for **00:08** a bunch of people with guns threatening **00:10** people with violence if they don't you **00:11** know **00:12** do the the healthcare system the way **00:13** **that people with the guns want it to be** **00:15** and if you put it that way oh **00:16** universal health care doesn't sound so **00:18** great after all and so i think the same **00:20** with the infrastructure funding plan **00:21** well who doesn't want infrastructure **00:22** who doesn't want it to be funded well **00:24** how can you be opposed the **00:25** infrastructure funding plan **00:26** but if you look at what it actually is **00:28** part of the coinbase reward **00:30** that's been going on for what you know **00:32** almost 12 years now **00:33** uh instead of it going to the miners **00:35** it's going to go to abc and armory **00:37** sashay and they get to decide what **00:39** they're going to do with it **00:44** [Music] **00:48** so hey everyone i have the wonderful **00:50** pleasure of speaking with the one and **00:51** only **00:52** bitcoin jesus roger fair how's it going **00:54** roger **00:55** hey joel so i **00:59** wanted to chat with you after i started **01:02** to see some **01:02** drama unfolding in the bitcoin cash **01:04** world and **01:06** it where it seemed like it wasn't just **01:08** people arguing because arguing happens **01:10** people disagree who cares **01:12** but it seemed like there might be an **01:13** actual chain split in another **01:15** bitcoin for coming out of this whole **01:17** thing and so **01:19** i initially in the recent weeks **01:22** especially you put your public **01:24** opposition **01:25** to the fork or to the people forking at **01:28** least **01:29** much much higher and there's been a **01:31** little bit more of an escalation and it **01:33** seems like **01:34** um as someone who's followed the bitcoin **01:36** cash community kind of from a distance **01:38** and a little more closely lately i've **01:41** seen a lot of people **01:42** some something kind of surprising on **01:44** both sides of this **01:45** issue very much like drawn into the **01:47** different camps **01:48** some people i did not expect to be on **01:50** both sides of the issue **01:52** and so yeah i think it's worth kind of **01:55** getting your take in a good spot by you **01:58** know **01:58** especially from someone who you know **02:00** myself **02:02** i kind of have i have opinions i don't **02:05** really care too much on either side i **02:08** definitely don't want bad things to **02:09** happen that that **02:10** i do care about but i kind of i see both **02:14** sides and i'm not exactly sure which **02:16** which side i'd i completely picked for **02:18** very different reasons **02:19** and so as a semi-neutral person i'd **02:22** definitely like to get your **02:23** get your take on this so first off we're **02:25** talking about the ifp or the **02:27** infrastructure funding proposal um **02:31** so when was the ifp first introduced not **02:34** this current one but **02:35** any ifp so we should probably explain **02:38** exactly what the infrastructure funding **02:39** proposal is because **02:40** i think that's the euphemism uh for what **02:43** it actually is **02:44** right so you can you know universal **02:46** healthcare that sounds wonderful but **02:47** when you look at what universal **02:49** care actually is it's just a euphemism **02:50** for a bunch of people with guns **02:52** threatening people with violence if they **02:54** don't you know do the the health care **02:55** system in the way that people with the **02:56** guns want it to be and if you put it **02:58** that way oh **02:59** universal health care doesn't sound so **03:00** great after all and so i think the name **03:02** of the infrastructure funding plan well **03:04** who doesn't want infrastructure **03:05** who doesn't want it to be funded well **03:06** how can you be opposed the **03:08** infrastructure funding plan **03:09** but if you look at what it actually is **03:11** is it's a **03:12** part of the coinbase reward that's been **03:14** going on for what you know **03:16** almost 12 years now uh instead of it **03:19** going to the miners it's going to go to **03:20** abc and armory sashay and they get to **03:23** decide what they're going to do with it **03:24** um that doesn't sound like such a **03:28** wonderful thing like one developer **03:30** and one group of developers get to **03:31** decide hey we're gonna alter the way **03:33** bitcoin has fundamentally worked for the **03:35** last you know well over a decade **03:37** uh to just basically enrich ourselves to **03:39** eight percent of the total block reward **03:41** each block **03:42** uh i think that's not nearly as **03:45** palatable **03:46** um because of the historical **03:49** track record of bitcoin bitcoin never **03:51** ever ever had anything like that **03:53** uh i think once you start tampering with **03:55** the the **03:56** emission schedule and the the uh **04:00** the block reward you're you're a whole **04:03** new coin at that point right so if you **04:05** want some coin where part of the block **04:07** reward **04:08** goes to pay for you know infrastructure **04:10** developers or that sort of thing **04:11** you have a bunch to choose from right **04:13** you have dash you have z **04:15** cash you have z coin you have a bunch of **04:17** others out there as well **04:19** um a bunch of coins that were pre-mined **04:21** to begin with a big **04:22** reward bitcoin never had that bitcoin **04:24** cash never had that **04:25** bitcoin sv never had that uh this is a **04:28** huge huge huge **04:30** change to the what bitcoin ever has been **04:33** uh and at the moment the group of **04:35** developers that want to do that abc they **04:37** have a very very small minority of the **04:38** hash rate **04:39** uh there's a future market that trades **04:41** it they have about 1 12 **04:42** the price so that the minority hash rate **04:44** the you know majority or minority price **04:47** and uh and they're the ones that are **04:48** making this huge huge drastic change to **04:50** what bitcoin has always been **04:52** uh so i don't think it's so much as a **04:54** four this is just they're creating **04:56** their own coin forking off the the **04:58** bitcoin cash blockchain **05:00** so that means all cash holders will get **05:02** an airdrop **05:03** on november 15th and then they can **05:04** decide what they want to do with that **05:06** airdrop they can keep it they can buy **05:07** more of it or they can sell it for **05:08** more ethereum to do defy stuff they can **05:10** sell it for more dash they can sell it **05:12** for more bitcoin cash they can do **05:13** whatever they want but uh **05:14** i i would be stunned if it winds up **05:16** being the majority chain uh somehow **05:18** because it doesn't have **05:20** the majority support it's a super **05:21** contentious thing the big surprising **05:23** thing **05:24** here like you mentioned certain people **05:25** within the community that you're **05:26** surprised came out in favor of this **05:28** um the one that i'm the most surprised **05:30** by i think is vin armani seems to be a **05:32** big fan of this but i think a lot of **05:34** these people they're like oh **05:35** they see they see dollar signs and they **05:38** want it and then **05:39** i guess there's a whole lot of truth to **05:41** that old adage that you know **05:42** always accuse your an enemy is too **05:44** strong of a word but always accuse your **05:46** your opponent of doing exactly what **05:48** you're doing and so there's been a big **05:50** meme where **05:51** uh meme war on social media and whatnot **05:53** and uh **05:54** calling all the people that don't want **05:56** the ifp who don't want to change the **05:58** coin issuance of bitcoin **05:59** cash they're calling them bitshifix **06:01** which i guess is a reference to **06:03** socialism and communism and that sort of **06:04** thing **06:05** but if you look at it that's exactly **06:08** what the ifp supporters are doing **06:10** they're claiming hey **06:10** we're doing a whole bunch of work and **06:12** you guys don't want to pay us for our **06:13** work so we're just playing gonna take it **06:15** that's what government they say oh we **06:17** built you know we built roads and we've **06:18** built schools we built an army **06:20** you're going to pay us whether or not **06:21** you wanted those things or not and **06:23** that's that's exactly what the abc crew **06:24** are doing they're saying hey **06:25** we built full node software and you're **06:27** going to pay us whether you want to or **06:28** not you're going to pay for it right out **06:30** of the block reward **06:32** and so i i think if anybody's you know **06:34** akin to communism **06:36** that sort of thing this whole thing or **06:38** if anybody's a the real bit shavik **06:40** uh ifp supporters because they're doing **06:42** exactly what governments do they're **06:43** building something **06:44** and then charging people for whether or **06:46** not they want to pay for it or not and **06:48** whereas the people oppose the ifp **06:49** they're like hey **06:50** we just want bitcoin cash and bitcoin to **06:52** continue how it's always been **06:53** uh where the block rewards go to the **06:55** miners and then the miners decide what **06:56** to do with it from there **06:58** yeah so that's a great rundown of where **07:01** the situation is today **07:05** how did it get started sorry well that's **07:07** that's a good that's a good recap of **07:09** exactly where we are today for people **07:10** who have not been paying attention **07:12** and they understand exactly what's going **07:14** on right now **07:15** but this idea of the ifp is it's been **07:19** around for a little bit **07:20** longer an idea of repurposing the block **07:24** reward for **07:25** development which in a way donations **07:28** to developers is a very roundabout kind **07:31** of way of that because **07:33** people get the block road goes to miners **07:35** either the miners or **07:37** people who buy it from the miners end up **07:38** with it and then if they give it to **07:40** it's still kind of the same way except **07:41** it's just shortening that path **07:44** and so what was the first ifp **07:47** iteration of the idea um **07:50** i don't really know maybe it was dash to **07:52** be honest because it's existed on other **07:54** coins **07:55** for a long long time before it ever had **07:57** was you know being discussed **07:58** within bitcoin cash there's a lot of **08:00** we'll talk about bitcoin cash **08:01** specifically so what is the first **08:03** ifp idea on there so the first time i **08:06** became aware of it is there was some **08:07** talk about how **08:09** if you divert part of the coinbase **08:11** reward to this infrastructure funding **08:12** plan **08:13** it doesn't just divert from the bitcoin **08:16** cash miners it might it diverts from all **08:18** the shot 256 miners so btc bch **08:21** and bsv and because bch only has a **08:24** couple of percent **08:25** of the total global hash rate for **08:27** shash56 that means that bch miners **08:29** would only pay a a couple percent of the **08:31** total amount of the ifp stuff so **08:34** how does that even work how do you use **08:36** well **08:37** not to use or steel but hey steel how do **08:39** you siphon off money from **08:40** other chains yeah safe enough money from **08:44** other chains **08:45** like is that because the same miners are **08:47** mining the other chains **08:49** and then they would voluntarily donate **08:51** some of that stuff **08:52** yeah so i know voluntary and course is **08:55** kind of blurry in in **08:57** in all of this here but uh the way it **08:59** works is that the **09:00** all the people that have you know **09:01** whatever bit main mining hardware or **09:02** whatever **09:03** they can mine bsv bch or uh btc and they **09:07** can hop back and forth and most of them **09:09** do **09:09** and they hop to whatever one's the most **09:11** profitable at the moment and they mine **09:12** that one **09:13** and so if you make bitcoin cash less **09:16** profitable to mine by not giving the **09:18** the miners eight percent of the block **09:20** reward that means part of the hash rate **09:22** that normally would have been mining **09:24** bch will just switch to mining btc or **09:27** bsv **09:28** and so if it switches to mining btc that **09:30** means btc is now slightly more difficult **09:32** to mine than it otherwise would have **09:33** been **09:34** and ch is slightly easier to mine than **09:36** it would have otherwise been **09:38** uh so you're basically sucking the **09:39** revenue from the entire pool **09:41** of sha 5256 miners and so that part kind **09:44** of seemed interesting like hey **09:45** we can get you know btc miners to **09:47** subsidize the development of bitcoin **09:49** cash **09:50** uh but the big problem is who gets to **09:52** decide who gets that bitcoin cash like **09:55** should it be you know should be armory **09:56** should it be you know should be **09:58** bitcoin.com who arguably has done more **10:00** to spread bitcoin cash adoption than abc **10:02** or any other business out **10:04** there and i think it's kind of like a **10:05** lord of the rings scenario which i **10:07** haven't seen lord of the rings but i've **10:08** seen people talk about enough **10:10** i guess their magic ring and the magic **10:12** ring has magic powers but as soon as **10:13** someone gets the magic ring **10:15** they go crazy with it you have to **10:16** destroy the ring otherwise it's going to **10:18** make everybody fight **10:19** and i think that's that's exactly what's **10:21** happened with ifp here **10:22** is it's this really powerful tool that **10:24** could be used to pay for a lot of really **10:26** interesting things **10:27** the problem is there's no way to decide **10:28** what it gets to pay for or who gets to **10:30** you know get paid for what and it just **10:33** caught a whole bunch of infighting and a **10:34** giant fracturing of the community so **10:36** i think it just at this point seems to **10:38** be too dangerous of a tool for bitcoin **10:40** patch to **10:41** to have and uh if you're a big fan of **10:43** the block reward paying for developers **10:45** you know you know more about dash than **10:47** just about everybody out there i think **10:48** dash is you know willing and eager **10:50** uh to have that sort of thing and i you **10:51** know i bought dash years and years ago **10:53** i i have a number of masternodes uh **10:58** there's no problem with that but that **10:59** was in the social contract from day one **11:01** with dash **11:02** this has never been the social contract **11:04** with bitcoin cash or the bitcoin cash **11:06** ethos and now it's trying to be uh **11:08** imposed **11:08** after bitcoin cash been around for you **11:10** know over a decade **11:12** yeah so for a slight clarification on **11:13** the dash stick as much as i would have **11:15** loved for it to be in day one it wasn't **11:17** exactly **11:18** and the dash history and this is one of **11:20** those things where like i love digging **11:22** deep **11:22** into the history of things because you **11:24** see kind of how where things came from **11:26** and you know like for example when **11:29** bitcoin way back in the day had that **11:31** crazy inflation bug that **11:33** you know i forget what it was called but **11:34** like people don't even know that they **11:36** think it was perfect since day one **11:37** or there's some new evidence that **11:40** satoshi or whoever **11:41** may have what they call fast mind **11:43** bitcoin is in running an **11:44** optimized miner that he did not release **11:46** to the general public and stuff **11:48** and then like and i love things like **11:50** that because it damages the mythos **11:52** of like this is something holy **11:55** conscription of bitcoin **11:56** yeah yeah it damages the mythos of any **11:58** all this any **11:59** you get to sort of focus on what **12:01** actually matters what works **12:03** is it technology any good who cares who **12:04** founded it kind of thing **12:06** and so a dash started as x-coin which is **12:09** literally just like a **12:11** a litecoin fork that was using an x11 **12:14** hashing algorithm that was kind of its **12:15** big innovation **12:16** and then there were some bugs and they **12:17** fixed that and then when it turned into **12:19** dark coin they **12:21** were kind of figuring out how to do a **12:23** more trustless coin join **12:25** and so they created masternodes for that **12:28** and they had a **12:28** there's a dash foundation for a while **12:30** and it didn't really work out and it was **12:31** until like **12:32** 2015 like about a year in that **12:36** from my memory again people can fact **12:37** check this that they found a way to **12:39** do a uh a vote a masternode vote **12:43** for a block reward type thing and so **12:46** that's kind of how it came about so **12:47** there were **12:48** a few minors and stuff but it was a **12:50** minor chain right there was not a lot of **12:53** activity not a lot of attention and **12:56** people just i guess agreed it doesn't i **12:57** don't think it was very controversial **12:59** the whole treasury idea i think it was **13:00** pretty **13:02** pretty evolutionary and part of that is **13:04** that dash has had in its history **13:06** an evolutionary kind of mindset **13:09** of we're going to make necessary changes **13:13** to the core protocol to **13:15** we're going to tinker we're going to **13:16** make things a little bit better if we **13:17** can **13:18** whereas bitcoin is much more we got to **13:21** stay what we're we got to change as **13:23** little as possible **13:24** that we can get away with to just kind **13:26** of you know keep things going **13:28** and so that's the kind of interesting **13:31** point of view because **13:32** wasn't abc more or less the founding **13:36** client of bitcoin cash **13:37** and this is where it gets like really **13:39** murky because um **13:41** with most cryptocurrencies i think **13:43** there's like one main implementation the **13:45** developers **13:46** kind of do that and with the various **13:49** bitcoins **13:50** there's a few of them but at the end of **13:53** the day **13:53** it seems like what gets implemented **13:57** is what the dominant team kind of does **13:59** like bitcoin core **14:00** the bitcoin core team basically decides **14:03** what happens **14:04** there's competing clients out there but **14:06** it doesn't really matter **14:07** and so it seems like abc sort of is the **14:11** founding development team if that even **14:13** if if that could even **14:15** matter in a decentralized world right **14:16** the founding development team of bitcoin **14:18** cash **14:19** so if i can interject briefly there so **14:22** bitcoin abc was the name of the client **14:24** and abc stood for adjustable block size **14:26** cap **14:28** but one half of that founding team so **14:30** there's america and then there's another **14:32** anonymous person named free trader **14:34** uh free traders the guy that uh is **14:36** behind **14:37** bitcoin cash node and so one of the **14:39** founders **14:40** of bitcoin cash's original client **14:44** is on abc still and the other is now **14:46** bitcoin cash node **14:47** of the and of the miners that are out **14:50** there that are mining bitcoin cash **14:52** um about about 50 are signaling for **14:56** bitcoin cash node for bitcoin cash yeah **14:59** it was 52 i checked a few minutes ago **15:01** yeah i haven't checked yet this morning **15:02** but uh **15:03** zero percent as of yesterday uh we're **15:06** signaling for abc **15:08** and then the other 50 or other 48 aren't **15:10** signaling at all **15:11** so at that point abc is clearly not the **15:14** dominant **15:14** uh note even though they have been **15:17** historically **15:18** uh but that that changed pretty quickly **15:20** with such a controversial **15:22** uh change to to what bitcoin cash is **15:25** yeah so if we're going to go from like a **15:27** kind of governance perspective type **15:29** thing **15:30** uh if there's a lot of coins that have **15:32** some kind of a **15:34** agreed-upon block reward split and most **15:37** of them **15:37** the best place to agree upon that is **15:39** that the founding right it was like when **15:41** you create it so anyone who uses it **15:43** implicitly uh agrees with that kind of **15:46** those those conditions and so one could **15:49** like let's just say abc is the founding **15:52** chain **15:53** they are the founding client and you **15:55** know for what for whatever purposes **15:57** but then what if they had implemented an **16:00** ifp **16:01** with the split from btc obviously **16:04** probably way fewer people would have **16:06** actually jumped on board **16:08** but just from a who's right kind of a **16:12** standpoint if they had just jumped the **16:13** gun done it right away **16:15** everyone's like look if you're going to **16:16** use this new cash style of bitcoin **16:20** you you're part of it's going to go **16:21** defend from the developers so we don't **16:23** have this kind of **16:24** developer capture like we had before **16:26** that would have been like **16:28** would that have been fine in your book **16:29** maybe not the coin that you would have **16:31** most preferred to use but that would **16:32** have been **16:32** like ethically fine yeah i think that **16:35** would have been fine but it would have **16:36** made the coin **16:39** a bit less interesting to me i suppose **16:42** if they had done it **16:42** if they did that from day one of the btc **16:45** bch split that would have made it a lot **16:48** more palatable the **16:49** the bigger any project gets the harder **16:51** it is to make these changes like that so **16:53** you know bitcoin cash is the third **16:55** biggest cryptocurrency **16:56** that's proof of work right so yeah btc **16:59** ethereum and then bitcoin cash is number **17:01** three **17:02** with with dash i'm not sure where it is **17:03** there but you know maybe **17:05** 30 or something so it's a lot easier to **17:07** still change things and even dash is big **17:09** right **17:09** so yeah the the smaller the smaller the **17:12** coin is the easier it is to make changes **17:14** bitcoin cash is the third biggest proof **17:15** of work coin in the world **17:17** uh i i think at this point it's not **17:20** something that you should be making **17:21** major changes to **17:23** the underlying economic code that made **17:25** you have this passionate community **17:26** because the **17:27** the tech and the community are both **17:29** incredibly important even if you have **17:30** really cool tech but you have a horrible **17:32** toxic community the tech's not going to **17:34** be used by anybody **17:35** uh and so you have to have both and like **17:37** america may be a fantastic developer but **17:40** uh **17:40** horrible community builder uh that's not **17:43** it's not **17:44** meant to be in a personal attack on **17:46** armory it's just supposed to be a **17:48** a statement of fact like you have to be **17:49** nice and friendly to people **17:51** and yeah homily have that he **17:54** his skills lie in other areas in the **17:56** world yes no matter which **17:58** which way if you consider the nicest **18:00** person in the world or the meanest **18:01** person in the world he does seem to be a **18:03** very **18:04** um kind of go for what he thinks is **18:06** right kind of a thing instead of get **18:08** group consensus **18:09** and see what the whole group thinks he **18:11** seems to be very very bold **18:13** which kind of comes from good we needed **18:15** to forget **18:16** i mean that created it right he just he **18:19** did exactly was like well i don't like **18:20** how you're doing stuff so i'm going to **18:21** do this **18:22** if you guys like what we're doing join **18:24** and it seems like **18:25** my understanding is that he was paid to **18:27** do that by uh **18:28** by jihan and some others as a **18:30** contingency plan for if they **18:32** wasn't allowed to scale so i i don't **18:34** know how much of that was **18:36** armory wanting to on his own versus **18:38** being paid to do that i i don't know **18:40** that's a question primary to to answer **18:42** yeah **18:43** i think that both would be my guess now **18:46** here's the thing where it gets **18:47** interesting uh the there's this council **18:50** now **18:51** this announced with abc or whatever **18:53** happens of course **18:54** a lot of this could be a moot point **18:56** because you could hit november it could **18:58** just be **18:58** there's a hugely lopsided hash rate **19:01** thing where it's like bitcoin cash note **19:02** is like 82 percent **19:04** and there's like now people are actively **19:06** signaling for abc and it's like at most **19:08** 10 percent **19:09** it's just like at that point they might **19:11** have just given up or something **19:12** i think you're being optimistic for abc **19:15** to be honest well we'll see **19:16** again i thought that sv wouldn't be **19:19** anything and **19:20** here it still is right i think svg had **19:22** the better economic **19:24** message of like a stable protocol for **19:26** businesses to build on top of **19:27** uh that part is fantastic and abc has **19:29** been the exact opposite of that **19:31** uh and it's been a problem for **19:32** businesses like bitcoin.com trying to **19:34** build on top of abc **19:36** and all and so bitcoin.com is focused **19:38** mainly on bitcoin cash **19:39** if it's a problem for us it's a giant **19:41** headache for all these other businesses **19:42** that **19:43** aren't married to bitcoin cash so all **19:45** the you know the coin bases and the **19:46** different exchanges out there that just **19:48** you know bitcoin cash for them is just **19:50** one of dozens of coins **19:51** they don't want to deal with a bunch of **19:52** drama they don't want to deal with **19:53** forking they don't want to deal with **19:54** hard forks every six months **19:56** uh they want it's you know stable and **19:58** reliable and they can set it up and get **19:59** it working and then **20:00** and then for the most part hopefully **20:02** leave it alone and sv **20:04** bsv has done a great job at promoting **20:06** that message **20:07** uh i don't know if that in reality but **20:09** they've been done a good job of **20:10** promoting that message **20:11** that seems to be the one thing that **20:13** anyone who **20:14** subscribes to the bitcoin theory or who **20:18** likes not just the tech because it is **20:19** just it is just tech **20:21** but there's ideas behind it that keep **20:23** other coins calling themselves bitcoin **20:25** and you know trying to keep to that **20:28** thing it's **20:29** there's an attachment to like the common **20:32** thread in all this that kind of makes **20:34** abc the outlier is the no one controls **20:38** or runs it **20:39** kind of a thing as in the development **20:41** team **20:42** is um is kind of the sticking point that **20:46** like who gets to run it **20:47** now um the permissionless nature of **20:51** cryptocurrency is **20:52** anyone can use it and you can't say **20:54** anything with it but of course that can **20:56** be changed if someone's running it **20:58** can decide things so but **21:02** i have to say i in all these years of **21:05** you know being crypto and focusing on **21:07** this stuff it seems like **21:10** that's one thing that like satoshi got **21:12** almost everything right like **21:14** the economic incentives work pretty well **21:16** the network runs **21:17** you can actually figure out how to scale **21:19** unchained there's like there's a lot of **21:21** cool stuff you can do **21:23** the one thing that seems to all of the **21:25** children **21:26** seems to be affected by is this kind of **21:29** governance **21:30** issue of basically **21:33** no one can figure out who's supposed to **21:35** decide things **21:37** and that is beautiful in a certain way **21:40** and on the other hand clearly someone **21:43** seems **21:44** some things need to be decided and then **21:46** there's just drama and fighting and **21:48** as i put in a pithy tweet a couple days **21:51** ago **21:52** it's either centralized or it forks or **21:54** you have governance **21:55** it's like the three things it's either **21:57** centralized **21:59** and therefore you know who makes the **22:00** decisions you don't know so therefore **22:03** people disagree and fork or it's some **22:06** kind of decentralized but you can **22:08** actually **22:08** have a mechanism for deciding without **22:10** forking have there been any **22:12** any forks or offshoots from dash after **22:14** the masternodes existed and that sort of **22:16** thing or **22:16** not as far as i know there's been **22:18** nothing um **22:19** way like a coup a year or so ago maybe **22:22** there was a **22:23** a chain split on called safe but that **22:26** was a **22:27** chinese knockoff purely profit thing **22:29** that people were just trying to create a **22:31** little airdrop thing like it wasn't **22:32** and almost no one in dash even knows **22:34** about this if you ask them like what is **22:36** safe **22:36** i don't know and so it just there are **22:40** fights there are arguments but those **22:43** things **22:43** collide in it they collide in a **22:47** situation and then there is a **22:49** resolution at some point and then it's **22:51** over **22:52** and i hate to change the subject too **22:53** much but from your fingers there you **22:55** must have been doing some jiu-jitsu **22:56** recently **22:57** yes is a dislocated pinky and it sucks **23:00** but tape is like a miracle though is it **23:02** not so **23:03** yeah it allows you to keep on you know **23:05** doing the same inadvisable **23:06** to your health decisions but yeah that's **23:09** that's what happens **23:10** now this wrist got wrist locked so it's **23:11** all it's it's a little **23:13** challenging right now but it'll it'll be **23:15** good forward wrist locks **23:17** yeah yes of course but to go so go back **23:20** to the **23:20** the governance idea type thing it um it **23:23** seems like **23:25** there is a need for someone to decide **23:27** here here's my **23:28** what i call crypto governance and **23:30** development right now **23:31** i call it the tragedy commons because **23:34** the system is extremely well designed as **23:37** far as **23:38** minor economic incentives who secures **23:40** the network who runs it **23:42** who profits from the fees who does all **23:45** this kind of stuff but the development **23:46** thing is kind of like **23:48** well we'll people will develop i guess i **23:51** don't know what do you think of that **23:52** concept **23:54** i think it's an experiment in motion **23:56** right **23:57** we have a better understanding of what **24:00** what's working and what's not and what's **24:01** happening and what's not so but uh **24:04** trial trial by era i guess yeah **24:07** so for example um when you think about **24:11** you know bitcoin had all this momentum **24:12** behind it and then **24:14** the bitcoin core team uh you know stuff **24:18** happened **24:19** it's for you know to summarize a lot of **24:21** stuff over the years and **24:23** stuff happened but uh it's so first off **24:26** the **24:26** organization if you could even call it **24:28** an organization of bitcoin core **24:31** was there for a long time is still **24:34** there very different people **24:37** you know who within bitcoin core right **24:40** because he used to have like **24:42** and mike hearn and some others uh jeff **24:45** garzik and then **24:46** other people that came to the project **24:47** later didn't manage to kick those people **24:50** out of bitcoin core yet still keep the **24:52** bitcoin core name for themselves and **24:53** then **24:54** morph bitcoin into a project that wasn't **24:56** what anybody signed up for **24:58** pre pre-2013 or 20 even 2015. **25:01** so yes and so the thing with **25:05** the the bitcoin core kind of thing it **25:07** seems like **25:08** like who holds the power is basically **25:10** decided by **25:11** github access it sounds like that's the **25:14** top thing **25:15** and so he who controls the github **25:17** controls the rules and so it seems like **25:20** whatever github's rules are for who has **25:23** access who can kick **25:24** other people off of having access **25:27** the repository control seems to be the **25:29** central point of **25:31** failure in bitcoin's governance system **25:33** in that case **25:34** because whoever does that you know kind **25:36** of rules and then **25:37** a s competing client **25:41** would have to build i guess you know **25:42** separate repository and you have to **25:44** actually get miners to **25:46** to jump on board now it seems like **25:49** miners are a passive actor more than **25:52** active in some cases they'd be very **25:54** active some cases they're like **25:56** this they you know fork off or they **25:58** might but it seems like there's rare **26:00** cases are they active i think you're **26:01** right that they're mostly **26:03** so and it's in obviously and they don't **26:06** fund development directly like most **26:08** mining pools the idea **26:10** of like the the what do we call the **26:12** paleo ifp **26:14** of let's just have mining pools give a **26:16** proportion of their stuff **26:18** kind of voluntarily to development **26:20** doesn't seem to have **26:22** taken root so it seems like you're **26:24** asking **26:25** people to donate for development and **26:28** like a foundation or something like that **26:30** that seems to be kind of the model **26:31** of the main bitcoins forks is that kind **26:34** of **26:34** it yeah i think it's been donations from **26:38** the businesses **26:39** in the ecosystem so like myself you know **26:41** i donated a bunch of money to bitcoin **26:43** core **26:44** back in the day i think mount docs gave **26:46** them money a number of **26:47** other businesses gave the money as well **26:49** and then more recently in bitcoin cash **26:50** days you know bitcoin.com **26:52** or myself have given a lot of money to **26:54** abc to bitcoin unlimited to the **26:56** be cash from from first i o their fork **26:59** of v coin for bitcoin cash **27:00** uh and a number of other things out out **27:02** there as well **27:03** um and there were just a bunch of flip **27:06** starters recently to fund bitcoin cash **27:08** development i think somewhere **27:09** you know close to a million dollars in **27:11** flip starters were recently donated to **27:12** various bitcoin cash infrastructure **27:14** funding plans and **27:15** until very recently the only flip **27:18** starter for full node implementations **27:19** that didn't get funded via flip starter **27:21** to their full amount they're asking was **27:23** abc **27:24** and i think it's not because the quality **27:26** of their work **27:28** isn't pretty good i think it's the **27:29** attitude that you go in **27:31** to it with right if you want people to **27:33** collaborate with you or to donate money **27:34** uh to you **27:35** you have to have a good attitude to go **27:37** with it and if you have a bad attitude **27:39** people aren't going to want to **27:39** collaborate with you on anything **27:41** and uh i'm not happy to say it but i **27:45** feel like **27:46** especially now with the ifp things going **27:47** on the attitude from some of these abc **27:50** guys and you know the **27:52** the biggest one is micro president uh **27:55** which is his real name shema chancellor **27:57** like i feel like that guy **27:58** gone off the deep end with these memes **28:00** attacking everybody and that's not the **28:02** way you know adult **28:03** software engineers trying to build a **28:05** protocol to enable peer-to-peer cash for **28:07** the entire world to literally change the **28:09** course of human history **28:10** that's not how those people should be **28:12** acting and it makes it **28:14** isn't the businessman in the space **28:16** they're you know building businesses and **28:17** trying to build the tools to enable that **28:19** we're not going to want to give money to **28:20** an organization that's busy trolling **28:22** with a bunch of stupid memes on on you **28:24** know twitter and reddit **28:25** every day uh that's that's juvenile **28:28** junior high school stuff that's not the **28:29** stuff that should be done by people that **28:30** are trying to build **28:31** the the platform to change the world for **28:33** the better so we get into **28:35** like who funds development and how does **28:37** it get funded and that seems to be a **28:38** little bit mixed **28:39** there's some positive examples where you **28:41** have a lot of donations that really go **28:43** and it works a bunch of major companies **28:45** step forward **28:46** and at the same time i've seen plenty of **28:48** people complaining all over **28:50** social media over the last several years **28:52** of any number of projects **28:54** oh we're broke there's no no donations **28:56** including bitcoin core very recently **28:58** like in the last several months i've **29:00** seen some people saying **29:01** there's not enough for that of course **29:03** charlie lee's always complaining or his **29:04** his people are always complaining for **29:06** litecoin there's always **29:08** there's a it isn't it can be done it's **29:10** not necessarily guaranteed **29:12** but it can be done in that might be a **29:14** scale thing like more businesses and **29:16** stuff **29:16** working on it could then you know **29:19** bring more awareness into like a scale **29:21** and leadership slash inertia kind of a **29:23** thing **29:24** it doesn't come with bitcoin but you can **29:27** build it on top of bitcoin and it does **29:28** can work relatively harmoniously as far **29:30** as just the funding **29:31** is that are we agreeing on that **29:33** absolutely the bigger the ecosystem the **29:35** more funding there will be for all these **29:36** projects and **29:37** and people need to also keep in mind **29:39** like donations yeah okay they're nice **29:42** sometimes you can get some money from **29:43** that the real way to build to make a big **29:45** change in the world is to build a **29:47** profitable business that earns money **29:49** right amazon **29:50** have changed the you know the entire **29:52** world supply chain **29:54** not by being a organization to ask for **29:56** donations like they say hey **29:58** donate us money and we're going to try **29:59** and build you know delivery within 24 **30:02** hours of everything **30:03** no they built a business they charged **30:04** their customers and they earned money **30:06** the reason bitcoin.com has so much money **30:08** to donate to different things and **30:09** different developers **30:10** is because we're a business that earns **30:12** money so if you want to like **30:14** move the needle in the world build a **30:16** business that earns money and you'll be **30:17** able to do that **30:18** all more effectively than building a **30:20** charity that begs for money all the time **30:22** yeah and that's where it gets **30:24** complicated because **30:25** uh you could say obviously businesses **30:28** running on a protocol are businesses **30:30** that's **30:30** very self-explanatory miners are a **30:33** business of sort because they provide a **30:34** good or service **30:36** and they receive compensation for that **30:38** and developers **30:40** is where it gets tricky because if you **30:42** are a hired by a company or something **30:43** like that sure you make money **30:45** if you're building a protocol that **30:46** everyone uses not for free but **30:49** for free to you there's there's no **30:52** direct way of **30:53** benefiting unless a company hires you or **30:56** sponsors you for deal now sponsorship is **30:58** more of a **30:58** charity type of a thing or a i i would **31:01** even agree so like let's let's take **31:02** bitcoin.com and myself for example right **31:05** uh with bitcoin cash i hold plenty of **31:07** bitcoin cash or even dash for example i **31:09** hold plenty of that **31:10** it would be in my economic interest not **31:13** for charity it would be my economic **31:14** interest **31:15** to pay developers uh to make bitcoin **31:18** cash's protocol more useful or make **31:19** dash's protocol more useful or build the **31:21** tools to enable **31:22** more commerce to happen with dash or **31:24** bitcoin cash or whatever **31:25** and so like that's a very clear economic **31:27** incentive because **31:28** you know if if i have let's say i have **31:30** 100 bitcoin cash right **31:32** and i donate 10 of the bitcoin cash that **31:34** i have **31:35** to pay a developer to do whatever uh but **31:37** the price goes up **31:38** uh of my remaining bitcoin cash by more **31:40** than 10 **31:42** i've made a profit so even though i have **31:43** a smaller absolute number of bitcoin **31:45** cash **31:46** the total value of that bitcoin cash is **31:47** higher so like uh **31:49** derrick mcgill said it exactly right in **31:51** a tweet a while back he said like the **31:52** lack of developer **31:54** funding uh in bitcoin cash it isn't it **31:57** isn't a market failure it's a market **31:59** signal **32:00** and so for example from bitcoin.com like **32:01** we have a substantial budget every **32:03** single month that we spend on all sorts **32:04** of things **32:05** we could devote a bigger part of that to **32:07** pay you know protocol developers **32:09** but in our economic opinion with all the **32:11** moving pieces we can see in the world **32:13** that's not the best use of our money our **32:15** the best use for our money is spent on **32:16** building **32:17** other tools inside the bitcoin cash **32:19** ecosystem so imagine if we still had the **32:21** same bitcoin.com wallet from **32:22** a year or two ago it's not anywhere near **32:25** as good as the one that we have today **32:26** but we spent a lot of money to build the **32:28** one that we have today **32:29** that money could have been given to abc **32:31** or somebody else to do protocol **32:32** development work **32:33** and let's say they did that but **32:34** bitcoin.com still has a crappy wallet **32:37** i don't think bitcoin cash would be in **32:38** as good of a position uh today **32:40** uh if we had done that rather than just **32:42** built focused on building our wallets so **32:44** the fact that companies like bitcoin.com **32:46** and others aren't donating money to the **32:48** protocol developers **32:49** that's market feedback not a market **32:51** failure **32:53** and i think that's an important concept **32:54** to understand and for the people that **32:56** say okay you're not donating well we're **32:57** just gonna plain take it **32:58** uh that that that drives a wedge in the **33:02** community and you're gonna destroy the **33:04** community even if you improve the tech **33:05** and if **33:06** let's say they managed to really improve **33:07** the tech but you've destroyed the **33:08** community in the process **33:11** congratulations you've you've broken **33:14** bitcoin cash **33:15** now that's the that's it that's the **33:18** really that's the point where you know **33:20** the rubber hits the road because **33:22** um there was also plenty of **33:25** company funding on development in **33:27** bitcoin core **33:28** a lot of it from a fantastic company **33:30** named blockstream **33:31** which donated to that funded development **33:35** that increased bitcoin's usefulness **33:38** for their economic purposes and **33:42** unfortunately those economic purposes **33:44** were not in the economic interest of **33:46** the rest of the of the world let's be **33:50** let's be pretty honest probably not the **33:51** rest of the world but it was in their **33:53** interests **33:54** and since they were paying the bills **33:55** they kind of got to decide so there's **33:57** nothing wrong with the funding it's just **33:59** what are the strings attached with the **34:00** funding **34:01** and so how do we kind of get to decide **34:07** how that works because it's not a **34:08** completely free market system here **34:10** it the free market system is all the **34:12** cryptocurrencies out there if you don't **34:13** like what this one's doing go to a **34:15** different one **34:16** that's a free market but as far as in **34:18** the **34:19** on the one ecosystem of one chain **34:22** that's not a free market because only **34:24** one person only one **34:25** path forward can exist developmentally **34:28** really i mean there can be **34:29** competing but at some point you gotta **34:31** resolve and you gotta all go with one **34:33** and **34:34** how do you actually decide that the one **34:37** this **34:37** decision mechanism seems to be the **34:39** miners but the miners seem to **34:42** not be interested in making decisions **34:44** for the most part **34:45** and so that might be the the failure of **34:48** the nakamoto system and i would say **34:50** failure like a **34:51** rude mean kind of a way but that could **34:53** be the one area of land for **34:56** yeah and i have to say with dash **34:58** governance **34:59** where it's an explicit vote and it's **35:01** very easy to vote voter participation is **35:03** not always hugely high either **35:05** and even though in my opinion it's a **35:06** much better system that you have a lot **35:09** more **35:09** easier consensus for that it's not like **35:11** it's it's perfect so **35:13** if if masternodes don't always vote then **35:16** how can you expect minors to vote so **35:19** what do you think you would change in **35:20** the system to **35:22** allow because either you have to **35:26** find a different governance mechanism **35:27** for deciding without splitting **35:29** without completely splitting or you have **35:32** to **35:33** find a way to get miners incentivized **35:36** in acting and like doing things **35:39** yeah that's the hard question what would **35:40** i change to make it better i **35:43** i don't really know um **35:46** i think kind of what we have right now **35:48** though people are free to **35:50** to argue about it and fork away if you **35:52** don't agree with what the **35:53** the main chain is doing and so that was **35:55** the origin of bitcoin cash **35:57** uh that was the origin of bsv uh and **36:00** that **36:00** may very well be the origin of the new **36:02** abc coin whatever it winds up being **36:04** called like if you don't agree with what **36:05** the main chain is doing **36:07** uh fork away and and try and do **36:09** something better that works better and **36:10** and who knows maybe maybe the ifp **36:12** version that forks away from from **36:14** bitcoin cash **36:15** maybe they'll build all sorts of useful **36:17** tech and somehow me maybe they'll rally **36:19** the community behind them and get the **36:20** adoption **36:21** from the you know the bit pays and the **36:22** go cryptos and maybe even bitcoin.com um **36:26** but i think that's really really **36:27** unlikely **36:28** uh the incumbent has such uh a powerful **36:31** position there **36:32** and it's so clear though in the current **36:34** circumstance bitcoin cash is the **36:36** incumbent and abc is working away from **36:38** bitcoin cash **36:40** yeah which is the second second thing **36:43** that's happened **36:43** and that's where we start to get to like **36:46** we're trying to build the most efficient **36:47** model possible **36:49** and bitcoin cash has been **36:52** in what would this be like what the **36:55** third fork of three years or something **36:57** like 2017 was split from btc and then **37:00** about a year later or so is split off to **37:03** sv **37:04** and then it's like your yearly your **37:06** yearly schedule chain split kind of **37:08** thing **37:08** it just keeps on splitting and i can't **37:10** imagine that's productive right i can't **37:12** imagine it's helping bitcoin cash become **37:15** stronger and more useful and have the **37:18** community resources diverted towards **37:19** good things **37:20** i think it's been disastrous yeah i **37:22** think it's been absolutely disastrous **37:24** uh and that's why i'm really sympathetic **37:27** to the the mantra **37:28** uh there of build a stable protocol for **37:31** others to build on top of **37:32** and uh i hope and i would like to see **37:34** the the **37:36** pace of these regularly scheduled hard **37:37** forks to be slowed down or **37:39** or extended or somehow uh not **37:43** forced to happen every single six months **37:45** because that causes fighting **37:46** as to what's going to be in the hard **37:48** fork and here we are again **37:50** with uh a part of the community **37:51** disagreeing with what should be in that **37:53** hard fork **37:54** and uh yeah perhaps uh you know **37:55** splitting away from bitcoin cash so but **37:57** uh **37:59** at the other hand from a business **38:00** perspective right i'll make sure i have **38:02** all my private keys for my coins at the **38:03** time of the fork **38:05** and then i can sell my you know airdrop **38:06** for more bitcoin cash or more dash or or **38:09** whatever else i want to sell it for **38:10** or hold it if that's what i want to do **38:12** uh but uh **38:13** you have to you have to go with what the **38:16** market conditions are you can't **38:19** wish your way into you know a perfect **38:21** world now this is an interesting **38:24** uh thing to look at because bitcoin sv **38:27** i have not been a fan of for most of its **38:29** existence there's some endearing tools **38:31** built on it like twitch i believe you **38:33** joined twitch recently let's just **38:35** is that is that correct okay good so it **38:37** is you a lot of people are saying it **38:38** wasn't **38:40** yes so there's a lot of interesting **38:43** tools being built on it **38:44** and as you've mentioned a lot of bsv **38:46** type lines **38:47** as far as stable protocol that like **38:50** business built on no drama that kind of **38:52** stuff **38:53** now of course the devil in the details **38:54** with bsv **38:57** their words to be clear too so well yeah **39:00** but the devil of details is as i said **39:03** you know for **39:04** it centralized and it seems like **39:07** so first off they do have core protocol **39:10** development right like isn't it the **39:11** shatters fellow or i don't know if **39:13** there's others but **39:14** and he is on somebody's payroll and **39:16** whoever's payroll whoever is paying him **39:19** decides what gets changed which in this **39:21** case is nothing but **39:22** could be in the future so if i can put **39:25** on my conspiracy theory **39:26** yes and i'm not super knowledgeable when **39:29** it comes to bsv stuff because i haven't **39:31** been following it closely **39:32** but uh craig just decided to sue me **39:34** again a couple of days ago **39:36** so he lost the last time and had to pay **39:38** me six figures apparently **39:40** he wants to pay me even more money when **39:41** he loses again here **39:44** the best defense you know against libel **39:46** is that it's the truth **39:47** uh yes um but the the the conspiracy **39:51** theory hat here is **39:52** is and i don't know if if calvin **39:55** believes him **39:56** genuinely or if he's just pretending to **39:57** believe him because it's convenient for **39:59** a business perspective but what it seems **40:00** like is happening here with their **40:01** lawsuit **40:02** is they're going to try and say that **40:03** okay the court has even ruled **40:05** that craig is satoshi and he has to pay **40:07** for the climate estate part of the **40:09** satoshi coins **40:10** and because calvin has such a big **40:12** percent of the hash rate on bsv **40:14** uh what it looks like they're gonna do **40:15** and you can see calvin even said that **40:16** they're gonna do it uh **40:17** on twitter recently as well they're **40:19** gonna fork they're gonna hard fork bsv **40:22** again to give **40:23** craig all the satoshi coins on the bsv **40:26** chain so they can use those to pay the **40:28** climate state so craig is going to hard **40:30** fork bsv to get a million around a **40:32** million bsv coins **40:33** and if the what the price of bsv coins **40:35** now are what like 200 bucks that's 200 **40:37** million **40:38** dollars worth of bsv uh there oh my **40:41** hard fork are we speaking of a chain **40:42** split are we speaking of **40:44** just an upgrade yeah so it depends on **40:47** what the rest of the bsv community does **40:49** and i feel like there's two groups **40:50** within the bsv community **40:52** there's the right kool-aid breakers that **40:54** believe everything he says and **40:56** oh the bonded crew he promised for years **40:58** was going to show up that didn't show up **40:59** well that's you know **41:00** whatever we're going to forget about **41:01** that because that was last week and all **41:03** the other broken lies and broken **41:04** promises well forget about it chris **41:06** we're gonna we're gonna continue to **41:08** worship him you know with blind faith **41:10** and then there's the other ones that are **41:11** just like craig's **41:13** i don't want to get sued for the full **41:14** time but craig is craig **41:17** but cool technology that we want to **41:19** build cool things on and we're just **41:20** going to ignore craig and calvin and **41:21** their **41:22** idi idiocracy um **41:25** yeah so that's kind of how i view it **41:28** there and it's the question is craig **41:29** does calvin have enough hash rate to **41:31** to push that hard fork update to give **41:34** craig all the bsv satoshi coins **41:36** and the rest of the community won't be **41:37** able to muster enough hash rate to **41:38** prevent that from happening **41:40** uh and i i don't know i'm not deep **41:41** enough in bsv to have much of an opinion **41:43** on that at all **41:44** yeah so it's clearly someone is at the **41:47** top trying to **41:48** use a chain for personal gain and other **41:51** people on the chain **41:53** will see if they agree or if they will **41:55** be willing to participate or whatever **41:57** but also one thing i've noticed is **41:58** almost every single **42:00** interesting project i think maybe twitch **42:02** is the outlier but i haven't **42:04** again i'm not into people's financial **42:05** business but **42:07** how heavily rely on end chain patents **42:10** and so **42:11** yeah and a lot of software esv is closed **42:14** source **42:15** at this point not closed and the people **42:17** can't see the code but closed **42:19** in the sense that people are not allowed **42:20** to reuse the code and that's kind of **42:22** like the whole ethos of this entire **42:23** cryptocurrency ecosystem is that **42:25** it's open source take the code and make **42:27** something even better with it and bsv **42:29** is closed uh close source in that **42:31** regards **42:32** yeah so it seems like there ha there's **42:35** like the big open question of like how **42:36** do you decide **42:37** who just how do you decide who decides **42:40** the the main things **42:41** where miners are the one easy answer for **42:44** a non **42:44** like let's say non-staked or **42:46** non-mastered type coin **42:48** but miners don't seem to really seem to **42:50** be passive **42:51** but now here's another here's a color a **42:53** couple examples that i would consider **42:54** positive examples **42:56** of what one would call protocol **42:59** decentralization **43:00** development centralization since birth **43:03** so let's **43:03** let's take z cash right uh z cash **43:07** was clearly a company electric coin **43:09** company **43:10** was created to create a privacy-focused **43:14** cryptocurrency **43:15** and do all kinds of experiments and **43:17** figure out what really works well and is **43:18** also **43:19** let people use the chain it's a public **43:20** chain anyone can use it **43:22** and just they get twenty percent of the **43:25** blockboard for a while and **43:26** i know they had their own little like **43:28** re-upping conundrum **43:30** relatively recently which i didn't **43:31** follow too closely but it seems like **43:33** something was agreed upon **43:35** and that seems like you just **43:38** accepted the electric coin company is **43:39** going to build everything **43:41** and if they don't do well the price goes **43:44** down and their profits go down **43:46** if they do well it goes up and then **43:48** there's the other i the other **43:50** one is library which had i believe **43:52** something like a 50 percent pre-mine **43:54** and even though it's a decentralized **43:56** proof-of-work coin the library **43:58** incorporated **43:58** has this big pot of the money that **44:00** they're just sitting on and developing **44:02** and doing an amazing job so far it seems **44:04** and uh building a protocol anyone can **44:06** kind of use and **44:08** i believe they might have given a chunk **44:10** of that away to something called the **44:11** library foundation and as soon as i saw **44:13** a library foundation i started seeing **44:15** rumors of oh this guy got banned from **44:17** the discord oh this **44:18** you know fighting over money that no one **44:21** knows **44:21** who they control but so in the case of **44:23** library zcash they seem to be building **44:25** great products that anyone can use that **44:29** are completely open source and can be **44:30** copied and things like that **44:32** but one team controls everything as far **44:34** as development and it seems to kind of **44:36** because it's accepted sort of work out **44:38** for now **44:39** do you what do you think of that idea of **44:42** that **44:42** kind of philosophy of development **44:46** yeah it's one thing when it's clear from **44:48** the beginning uh i think when it's **44:50** changed you know **44:51** more than a decade in yeah you make a **44:53** change that major you know a decade in **44:56** i don't think and it's a contentious **44:59** split **44:59** i don't think the one making that super **45:01** major contentious chain **45:02** uh change has the right the name anymore **45:06** at that point uh whereas with you know z **45:07** cash is pretty clear and a lot of people **45:10** don't realize this really early on there **45:11** was a fork of z cash **45:13** that didn't have the classic called z **45:16** classic and so z cash has this **45:18** infrastructure fund z **45:20** classic doesn't z cash has done **45:22** significantly better than z classic **45:24** and so maybe that's an example of how **45:27** coins with the infrastructure funding **45:28** can do better **45:30** but you als but i also think part of it **45:32** is that you don't have this **45:35** you know great community around z **45:37** classic whereas you do have a pretty **45:38** strong **45:38** z cash community i think that is the **45:41** reason that z **45:43** cash has done better than z classic **45:44** because of the ifp **45:46** equivalent there or is it because of the **45:47** stronger community and uh **45:49** and certainly the stronger community **45:51** played a role in it not how much did the **45:52** ifp **45:53** play or the the funding for probably **45:55** some as well **45:56** uh but the thing that that appears makes **45:58** me so worried about the **46:00** ifp on bitcoin cash is it'll destroy the **46:02** community **46:03** and uh i think the community is just as **46:06** important if not more important than **46:08** any money to pay for for the developers **46:10** there to to work on the protocol **46:13** yeah now that's um so **46:16** the idea of an ifp type thing **46:19** from day one i mean obviously the **46:20** contention is you're coming in **46:23** halfway through the agreement or **46:25** whatever point of the way through the **46:27** agreement and you're just saying here's **46:28** it's gonna be completely different it's **46:30** like well i never agreed to this **46:32** but say it was just hey i'm starting **46:34** like **46:35** you get the time machine you go back and **46:37** get to whisper in satoshi's ears he's **46:39** starting this whole thing and **46:40** you just get to tell them like look **46:42** things are awesome **46:44** but some crazy things happen you know **46:46** stuff happened right **46:47** but stuff happened along the way uh **46:50** why don't you you know introduce a one **46:53** percent ifp **46:55** for you know whatever in the beginning **46:57** obviously you know that is kind of how **46:59** points started right because the coins **47:00** were basically free in the beginning **47:02** and then people had to go out there and **47:03** do the work to make the coins have value **47:05** by making the coins be useful in **47:07** commerce **47:08** and so that way anybody that had bitcoin **47:10** early on then becomes financially **47:11** incentivized **47:12** to make them more useful for more people **47:14** around the world in more use cases **47:16** uh and so now you know i'm not sure **47:19** exactly when **47:19** some of these abc people got involved um **47:22** but if you look at it there are plenty **47:24** of people early on in the early days **47:25** that had **47:26** cheap bitcoins that were you know **47:27** motivated to to help uh **47:29** make them more useful to the world and **47:31** fund those sorts of things **47:33** yeah so would you think that it's a good **47:36** idea to have the semi-centralized **47:38** development team of a completely **47:41** decentralized protocol **47:43** idea obviously it's working right now in **47:45** some cases but **47:46** do you think that would be a good idea **47:48** for say bitcoin to have started with **47:50** yeah i don't know um i think it's worth **47:53** a try and that's why it's cool that **47:54** there's so many different **47:55** cryptocurrencies now people can try **47:57** every different combination of of you **47:59** know infrastructure funding and **48:00** community building and this and that **48:02** and uh eventually we'll figure out which **48:04** ones work work the best so i think it's **48:06** definitely worth trying **48:08** uh i don't think it's worth pivoting 10 **48:10** years in on an existing uh **48:12** existing coin yeah and so it **48:15** this brings back to now we're going to **48:18** be a more established governance systems **48:20** and then possibly some **48:22** cool ideas for the future but because i **48:25** don't think that **48:26** the history book is written on crypto **48:28** and what works and what doesn't i think **48:29** we have like hundreds of years of **48:31** completely different systems ahead of us **48:33** but so for example **48:35** the dash system is pretty efficient at **48:38** resolving differences like when there's **48:41** a big disagreement like should we **48:43** on chain scale yes or no this way should **48:46** we adopt which **48:48** new logo should we adopt these are ones **48:50** let's do this one **48:51** that seems to be pretty efficient on **48:52** doing that and pretty efficient at **48:54** getting funding for **48:55** the one main development team and where **48:58** it becomes **48:59** a little bit less efficient what i've **49:01** you know my personal opinion over the **49:03** years watching is **49:04** when you start funding other ecosystem **49:07** projects **49:08** and there be just because whenever **49:10** you're doing some kind of a **49:12** subsidy type of a thing like a grant **49:14** system or you know you have a you're **49:16** paid from a pot of money type of thing **49:18** you kind of sever the economic **49:20** incentives of a free market **49:22** and i've noticed a inefficiency because **49:24** of this and it's not you know **49:27** with the development team of obviously **49:30** that's the big market mover **49:32** and people you know change the price **49:34** changes more what the development team **49:35** does **49:36** rather than anything else that's funded **49:37** by the ecosystem now **49:39** uh re so one issue was whatever new **49:43** dash coin coins created **49:46** are for the treasury if they don't get **49:48** issued to something they don't get **49:50** created at all **49:51** and of course based on scarcity that **49:53** means if you don't spend the whole **49:54** treasury **49:55** your funds are going to be your money as **49:57** an investor or worth more **49:59** but there hasn't been an economic signal **50:02** to connect those two **50:03** so a lot of people a lot of masterminds **50:05** have you know voted in i guess an **50:07** economically illiterate way and just try **50:09** to use up **50:09** all the treasury doesn't matter where it **50:12** goes to just because **50:13** we have free money but they're starting **50:16** to change the last few cycles have not **50:18** been completely spent they've left some **50:19** on the table **50:20** but they're um they're experimenting **50:22** with a **50:24** protocol change they would basically **50:26** make any funds not created **50:29** for the still get created but sent to **50:31** minors masternodes **50:32** so you actually get to see what you'd **50:34** save if you don't do **50:36** and i think that will really change **50:38** things on that sense that sounds **50:40** great yeah yes and then we're going to **50:43** uh i don't know too much about d cred **50:45** and that's one project i really have to **50:46** do a **50:47** deep dive on but i do know that they **50:49** have some sort of a staked governance **50:51** voting system and a treasury **50:53** but also i think that the that vote **50:57** votes on protocol changes as well and **51:00** as sort of a and not just a hey if **51:03** someone decides to ask a question we get **51:05** to decide **51:06** but every time there's like a hard fork **51:08** or whatever time there's a new thing at **51:10** you it's not just nakamoto consensus the **51:12** stakeholders have to actually **51:14** vote and okay the thing whereas with **51:16** dash right now you know the developers **51:18** create it they put out the code and the **51:20** miners usually choose to implement it **51:22** and they could **51:23** hard fork if they wanted to they just **51:24** tend to not so that's another **51:26** interesting idea **51:28** but here's the thing i was kind of **51:29** thinking because you still are trusting **51:31** the inefficiency of a development team **51:33** you still are trusting one team one **51:36** group of people one company as it were **51:38** and all the people in it is efficiently **51:40** enough run and **51:42** there is a certain level of inefficiency **51:44** they'd have to sync to **51:46** before the network would vote to revoke **51:48** their contract and add it to a new **51:51** new development team testing that limit **51:54** right now **51:54** yes well they don't have i mean the **51:57** council thing **51:58** uh i'll interject in a little bit about **52:01** the council things that's interesting **52:03** but here's an idea right what if **52:07** you could create some sort of a **52:08** decentralized github **52:10** type of a thing and **52:13** basically you would try you could track **52:16** developer **52:18** activity and basically **52:21** transaction fees there's a small split **52:25** of that would go to **52:26** developers based on their activity in **52:29** success or something like that **52:30** obviously it's a very rough idea yeah **52:32** you're the success right that's the hard **52:34** part **52:34** so yes success means like **52:37** the final product different things to **52:39** different people as well though **52:41** yeah yeah right luke junior's definition **52:43** success is going to be totally different **52:45** than you know gavin and jerusalem's **52:46** so yes but basically if you could track **52:49** uh **52:50** whatever whatever implementation gets **52:52** created whoever contributed **52:54** the most to that implementation gets a **52:57** higher percentage **52:58** of whatever and so like for example like **53:00** a one or two commit **53:02** developer doesn't really get a bunch **53:03** again this is considering this is this **53:05** implementation got **53:06** but through it sounds like a fantastic **53:08** way to generate more **53:09** infighting uh all day my commits more **53:12** important than your commit and i **53:14** committed more well your commits weren't **53:15** people was my fewer commits and people **53:17** are going to spend all day arguing **53:18** rather than building things and so i **53:20** think the profit **53:21** mechanism of the market by building **53:23** tools where people actually are **53:24** engaging in commerce to earn money i **53:26** think that's the the best way to figure **53:28** all this out and and uh **53:30** speaking of that i need to get back to **53:31** my normal work pretty soon there but uh **53:33** i'd be happy **53:34** you know part two of this again at some **53:35** point in the future yes do you have like **53:37** two minutes to discuss the council so **53:39** ifp **53:41** and now obviously on its own as abc is **53:44** the **53:45** lord regent developer team of of **53:48** whatever coin they end up **53:49** at the top of lord of the rings uh **53:52** person your character no just i'm saying **53:55** it's like they're they're **53:56** the kings of whatever chain they're on **53:58** now **53:59** they've mentioned something about it **54:02** creating like a governance board type **54:03** thing **54:04** where major mining pools and **54:08** major stakeholders would come and have a **54:10** say on what happens to that money is in **54:12** first uh it's going straight to abc so **54:14** they don't ha at that point they don't **54:16** have to **54:17** share it at all but now they're saying **54:20** we get we'll invite people to a council **54:22** and we will let them based on their **54:25** importance in the ecosystem that is **54:26** cryptographically proven by mining **54:28** whatever we will let them decide what **54:30** happens to that money **54:32** yeah i think i think this seems more **54:34** like a bribe to the miners and if you **54:35** look at it like we just talked about **54:36** earlier **54:37** the miners not wanted this authority or **54:40** this this uh **54:41** they just want to mine their coins and **54:42** be left alone uh they don't want **54:44** responsibility of governance here uh and **54:47** so if anything it seems like it's just a **54:49** way to try and bribe them and to be **54:51** honest like **54:52** okay mining is important it secures the **54:54** network the bitcoin.com wallet is by far **54:56** the most popular **54:57** bitcoin uh cash in the entire world **55:00** and electron cash is probably number two **55:03** and uh abc hates both of those projects **55:05** at this point because both of those **55:06** projects aren't uh in favor of the ifp **55:09** so you can be guaranteed that both **55:10** bitcoin.com and the electron cash **55:12** project **55:13** aren't going to be on the governance **55:14** board and they're not going to get any **55:15** of the money anyhow so it's it's the **55:17** exact **55:18** problem again and i i think you know **55:20** this is just **55:21** a tool that leads to never-ending **55:22** fighting and because it leads to **55:24** never-ending fighting **55:25** it attracts people from building and **55:27** it's something that the ecosystem **55:28** doesn't need or **55:29** and shouldn't want so now we've spent **55:32** all this time talking about fighting **55:34** your parting thought of what's the most **55:35** exciting thing you're working on right **55:37** now **55:38** i want to build cash fusion uh right **55:40** into the bitcoin.com wallet so you have **55:42** super private uh **55:44** super fast super cheap super reliable **55:46** transactions uh **55:47** you can get cash fusion already from **55:49** cashfusion.org **55:50** today desktop but i can't wait to have **55:52** it on mobile so everybody uses this **55:54** that'll give **55:55** you know once we have that and then **55:56** reusable payment codes like bitcoin cash **55:58** transactions will be in the same sort of **55:59** bulk general ballpark **56:01** of privacy is something like monero and **56:03** monero's fantastic the problem is modern **56:05** era doesn't have that big of a network **56:06** effect **56:07** uh and it's accepted around the world **56:08** and and governments have been hostile to **56:10** monero because the privacy has been at **56:12** the protocol level **56:13** whereas if we build the privacy in the **56:14** bitcoin cash uh above that **56:17** uh it'll be hard for governments to to **56:19** blame bitcoin cash you can say no the **56:20** blockchain's totally transparent you can **56:22** see every transaction **56:23** every step of the way so it'll be really **56:25** hard for governments to **56:26** to ban bitcoin cash whereas they've **56:28** already banned exchanges in certain **56:29** countries **56:30** from from listing monero so that that's **56:31** what i'm most excited about and then the **56:33** token stuff a lot of people don't **56:34** realize **56:35** tether is already on bitcoin cash you **56:36** can send and receive usdt **56:38** in your bitcoin.com wallet for a **56:39** fraction of a penny if you do that in **56:41** ethereum at the moment the fees are like **56:43** 20 dollars today **56:44** uh so bitcoin cash and bitcoin cash **56:47** based tokens work **56:48** uh right now today and bitcoin cash **56:50** token network can handle more **56:52** transactions than all of bitcoin and all **56:54** of ethereum and all the ethereum token **56:55** transactions uh **56:56** combined uh so bitcoin has tons of **56:58** scalability and then the price uh per **57:00** transaction will still be less than a **57:01** penny so **57:02** i think we'll i'm pretty excited to see **57:04** more people start using their stable **57:05** coins on top of bitcoin cash **57:07** rather than uh than some of these other **57:09** chains well fantastic this has been a **57:11** great chat thanks so much for your time **57:13** roger and yeah we'll get this out **57:14** shortly **57:15** fantastic thank you joel see everybody **57:16** next time if you like the content **57:18** subscribe **57:18** like and share uh this video from joel's **57:20** channel and check out his other videos **57:22** and other content as well **57:23** thanks for the plug **57:30** [Music]
3 comments
Must have been a lot of work!
yes sir; its taken a lot of hour but itskinda wasting my time because they havent seen my article...
Yes really very time consuming work. If anyone doesn't want to read this article just want to come to the comment box, it will take at least a minute. Thank you @ErdoganTalk for giving him a generous tip .