CoinDesk lightly touching on only one of the issues with Solana's outtage in last 24 hours, claiming the current issue stems from cold storage "niche transaction" operations : https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2022/06/02/solana-halted-by-bug-linked-to-certain-cold-storage-transactions/ But Solana devs stated there are more than a single issue that remains to be resolved to reduce congestion. It can't be blamed solely on botting of candy machines. Nor niche transaction pipelines. While Ethereum has been rightly blamed for excess gas fees, it is largely stable and doesn't have an all out outtage. Given the opportunity to trade nfts and mint nft projects, would people prefer a network that makes your NFTs completely inaccessible or one that always gives you access to move them around, so long as you can fence the fees? I think most would prefer liquidity over low fees. No matter how low Solana's fees are, if you can't do anything with your SOL wallet because the network is "shut down", Ethereum has the upper hand, and any L2 on ETH.
Log in to join in Reading is open to everyone. Replying needs an account.
No comments yet