@cryptotalk96 20 June 2022 more from that month

Most people are not ready to run a blockchain development team. It requires a certain kind of ego that can take criticism and knows rules are extremely important. There are lines you do not cross when you "tend to" the efficiency of a blockchain that is "live" for public users. Watch this video as co founder of Solana speaks about governing: twitter.com/IOHK_Charles/status/1532360549857693697?t=94y9hVt3VKyf1AVLdN6yrA&s=19 ~ - Unfortunately, egotists cannot make any government or blockchain long term viable - their ego will be the demise of the project and the community's trust will be destroyed. - Solana could have survived if it was governed properly, even as a centralized "blockchain". Governance means governing and taking that authority with seriousness, more seriousness than the average user or the nft-degen mindset. - Sadly, the co founder displays a lack of respect for his users and for the authority vested in him as a developer. This reflects upon the structures, internally and externally, that we now see in play as the Solana situation devolves in chaos. - NFTs on Solana are now in present and active danger due to the dissolution of Solana's trust and community