In the last week, we have seen and listened so much about the Jiang Proposal, and with divergent opinions about the infrastructure funding plan (IFP), but it's clear that's the development of a Ecosystem depends of the efforts of all involved in it!
Let's be clear, and go straight to the points:
The Fund will be in behaviour of the BCH ecosystem Development and Spread of the BCH asset as a peer-to-peer cash, positive
The Fund will be well managed by a transparent Firm with Legal powers and only in BCH, positive
There will be periodically inform in what is happening with the Fund, positive
I prefer to see the Infrastructure Funding Plan as benefit for all the BCH community, despite looking for negativity on it, maybe the proposal took the involved as suddenly thing, but we have to look more to the BCH ecosystem, not to personal reasons, as business come first to all of us and the security of it is a priority.
That feel like a compulsory or even obligation to all, but it isn't, but if you don't participate on the funding what are doing to develop the BCH ecosystem?
As a merely user I can opt in or out, but as a maintainer of the Ecosystem sometimes you can't opt- out only in!
So guys, as a community member it's kinda strange to see, the "leaders" getting on a controversal caused by this proposal ,but here's the thing, it's a good strategy to the development of the BCH infrastructure... I surely don't wanna wake up an see that we had an "attack 51" like recently happened with the Bitcoin Gold!
So, let's work as one and always looking to the future of the BCH as a peer-to-peer cash system, the best among the best!
Good week to all!
yes, let's do that