Considering several large token burns of the SLP version of Konra, then doing it like the SEP20 version where there are incremental minting letting the token ecosystem grow over time as it decentralizes more. I never felt comfortable having so much of the total token supply in the dev wallet and there is no feasible way to get enough people to take Konra / trade it to decentralize it enough for my liking since it's still so new. In my humble opinion Konra should be a low cap token until it grows bigger. There are already over 300 holders (SLP version) but that doesn't justify a supply of 100 Million tokens. I really like the direction I'm taking with the SEP20 version a LOT more. It makes me think of what's best for the community and has me earning my tokens incrementally too with the development of the project.... It will take some time to equalize everything out and to find a way to bridge the two better, but that way it feels a lot more natural and increases the fairness of the distribution a lot more. So what does the community think of me doing the token burns and then minting incrementally to let the supply of Konra grow with it's adoption and use over time? #BitcoinCash