Reflecting daily by feeling and listening to the concerns of the people with whom we share BitcoinCash on a daily basis, there is a common factor among all the messages we receive. "Thank you for offering us a new path"
Makes me wonder, is Bitcoin Cash a new path? I am trying to help them escape from a world where controls are already biased by the most powerful and very few benefit from the work of many, so to offer a BitcoinCash for all it is necessary to offer a real alternative, therefore I have decided Express myself.
Bitcoin Cash is a real alternative with an incredible future but first it must heal its wounds and that is where we are seen as those with a different plan every six months as Steve Patterson defines us in his reflections between BTC-BCH-BSV, but this is what makes us innovators and followers of the premise of the money of the future, those different perspectives that will allow us to lay the foundations of a multipolar governance project with the best proposals to offer a plan where miners can exercise their power of decision close to the interest of the community and the market, without being deceived by groups that wish to manipulate the coinbase in a centralized way with ephemeral answers to the questions.
Bitcoin Cash for all is under threat of being redefined through a coercive code of a part of the community in exchange for the benefit of a few with a promise of sustainable development. They will have the power to decide after guaranteeing their percentage of the juicy coinbase and deciding which will be the roadmap to follow with plans that are kept under hidden or very unclear agendas.
Now, is it a benefit to divide us?
Sadly it will not be now or ever, I admire and know people on both sides and I respect them in their opinion but unfortunately we cannot escape from a situation where all of us who feel this project as a hope for the prosperity of humanity, be it capriciously driven by the arrogance of a group that wishes to threaten the essence of liberty as a lifetime concession.
Who can help us to do it?
It is evident that ordinary people cannot do it, the power of decision rests on the miners, it sounds very easy but also the miners must be advised and educated to know the power they have.
They may be indifferent to the fact of using this power, but nevertheless they are the ones who define the rules of the game with their mining power and will decide who to support in the next division, the implementation of various decentralized development groups as well as the appearance of BitcoinCash Node has partially dismantled this threat.
It is just 11 years since Satoshi Nakamoto gave us everything working and after several divisions it is urgent to create a conscience in the miners so that the foundations of sound money can be laid for future generations, they are the main executors.
When can we realize the problems?
In the early stages it was the most recommended, but even so there has not been the will to do so and that is because when differences exist we choose to divide the chain, if we want to integrate multiple races, religions and communities to make BCH something global there is differences that will have to be debated to establish new goals and ways to make Bitcoin Cash money for everyone, without resorting to fork as a hobby.
In this case, the adjustment of the difficulty in Bitcoin Cash was the trigger for an already deteriorated relationship, where the development hegemony of ABC was threatened, but do we want a Blockstream 2.0? For us an alternative that seize coinbase percentages is not an option.
All this has brought the miners closer to listening to the community, spaces such as Read.Cash and social media have allowed to expose messages and opinions that bring closer contact between user, developer and miner.
Is it ethical to offer updates where the addresses of a group on which the destination of these funds will not be known?
These types of questions have been heard by those who control hashpower on a smaller and larger scale, after 10 months of the first proposal it is evident that many people used their knowledge to exert pressure, as well as disqualify and dismiss the results favorable to BCHN. From direct insults to group disqualifications towards supporters of the decentralized alternative of development.
This is why it is necessary to approach miners and inform them, development groups cannot make a decision about miners or deceive them with an update that will only benefit a team without having a counterpart that protects the essence of the cryptocurrency.
It has been very uncomfortable to talk about decentralization around each of the tasks that have been developed in Bitcoin, many suggest a supreme group but not everything can revolve around a few or a person, after all it will be necessary make a decision about the future of how decisions will be made within BitcoinCash that allows everyone to participate.
It is just 3 years in which laying the foundations of governance within Bitcoin Cash seems complex but necessary to guarantee a stable future development, from my point of view all the efforts made to establish an effective mechanism and that allow everyone to participate.
When offering an alternative path with Bitcoin Cash to the political doctrines infiltrated by bureaucracy, corruption and centralization to benefit only power elites, simply offering the figure of a benevolent dictator is not what we want to find to those of us who flee from authoritarianism and the meager opportunities.
Establishing an alternative governance where miners and developers participate, listening to the groups that give usefulness to the cryptocurrency and that allows increasing the benefit of all from a pre-consensus and consensus step, would unify us in goals of greater interest and others that may go taking relevant roles within the ecosystem as future plans on the roadmap to sound money.
Thus ensuring a protection of the future of the project and avoiding the invasion of agents who bet on failure and who only want to divide the community, instead of being Bitcoin Cash builders.
Who are opposed?
Decentralized development is necessary for everyone, although some mock as the ineffective option to give profitability to the cryptocurrency, it is incredible how even people who want to promote the use of Bitcoin cash with interesting projects recommend gold and silver or highlight the advantages of USD on BCH.
So where have you wasted your time developing on something ephemeral? Is it better to use Visa than Bitcoin Cash? Really?
Issuing judgments from privileged positions can lead to make the existence of Bitcoin Cash invisible as a passport to freedom, and also confuse those who still doubt that the dollar has become a currency of manipulation and geopolitical benefit of some governments worldwide.
Talking in this way only defines a particular interest in the project rather than a real conviction about BitcoinCash, a perfect piece to foster internal divisions and turning points for the success of BCH.
From Vevezuela I can tell you dear @TobiasRuck that with a devalued currency during the last 10 years I only have one credit card and its maximum credit capacity is $ 0.50 working every day since my first job and additionally I cannot use it in international shopping, is this freedom?
All payment mechanisms through centralized digital platforms such as paypal, visa or Mastercard are supported by mechanisms that not only offer you a feeling of freedom, they also invade your privacy and the way you use the money.
Under a scheme of user fees, you and the merchant continue to privilege an invasive and coercive system of economic freedom, perhaps when your funds are taken or the value of your work is devalued, you will understand, BitcoinCash is borderless money.
If USD is the best money, the birth of Bitcoin Cash would never have been possible, trying to offer what the white paper says to people caught in the cobwebs of failed economic doctrines.
In third world countries, the bank capitals that offered credit and the power groups are responsible for hijacking the savings and work of many with a promise of freedom with hidden agendas, they offer you economic freedom under conditions that benefit a group to doing business very similar to what BTC is currently, high fees, conditions for the use of the network framed in a Ponzi system with parallel layers to the Blockchain, a cryptocurrency hijacked by the hegemony of the world economy.
It is the same thing that they want to sell us now, a development premise in exchange for a percentage of the coinbase, but I do not want to live in the BCH what I live daily in a society poisoned by the monopoly of power.
The development of decentralized and open source alternatives in all the activities that take place in Bitcoin Cash will guarantee its free development and will protect BCH from a future Blockstream or from being managed by a corporation, there are financing alternatives that are dictating the pattern and are being supported by miners anonymously to increase the value and usefulness of Bitcoin Cash for the benefit of all around the world.
The growth of a financing alternative that has managed to raise close to a million dollars for the projects under development of BitcoinCash, is not an achievement that should be overshadowed with articles and arguments that only underestimate its impact as a sustainable business model, in less six months and in a fragmented community is certainly a point of cohesion to move forward.
It has also functioned as a gateway to the ecosystem of minor actors who had never been able to participate in the growth of Bitcoin Cash around the world in a leading way.
There are people who do not recognize or want to hide these results and only defend themselves under the pride of being the most qualified people.
That same pride that dismisses the term "community", for my community are all the participants and new members, to each person who gave him a paper wallet, the merchant worried about the devaluation of his currency that now accepts BCH, the father who Get to know about BitcoinCash thanks to a bag full of educational tools for the education of your child. They are all part of the community. If those who dismiss the term "community" really want to transform a money model and help the world to be a better place they should be a little more humble and acknowledge the help of all.
Obviously in the world of cryptocurrencies there are many people without scruples or values to say one thing one day and do something totally different the next day, or one day hug someone the next day publicly accuse him, but even if you want to build something for everyone You must have some credit of what you have done and what you want to do without looking like a mercenary.
Building a Future
The donation model is something that, despite not being developed in the best way and with some technical limitations, is publicly open to all, allowing to lay the foundations of a sustainable development and with goals that can be demonstrated, in order to pursue the roadmap better adapted to the future of BitcoinCash without putting at risk the real essence of freedom as it is a decentralized open code that allows to offer hard money for everyone.
The model of voluntary donations under a decentralized development is a model that with just a few months allows us to ensure with facts that it is a model that is filling many hopes through BitcoinCash and really offering new paths.
I am very sorry for the little content that still exists on topics of interest about BitcoinCash in Spanish, I hope to continue contributing from my small position and accompany the message of BitcoinCash with facts, that people can feel them and help to benefit those who still dream of freedom and prosperity without hidden conditions.
It is necessary to continue integrating ourselves as a community, it is not possible to continue working from islands where we only wish luck to those who start a new project when we all pursue the goal of Bitcoin Cash for everyone, in 10 months we have lost valuable people within the ecosystem who have abandoned their Projects within the BitcoinCash, ideas that are born and in (6) months announce their closure because they are not very sustainable or simply because they are not used by people, this hostility has done us a lot of damage and has distorted the message, we cannot stop, we must continue to sow hope. Big blocks of hope on chain.
Sofia 💚
We appreciate the alliance with our first sponsor @OKEX We are very motivated to continue building with you the present and future of the use of cryptocurrencies in Spanish. Thank you!
Nice written article....thanks for sharing