#BullishBityard: Community voting while waiting for the judges verdict

No need to say anything... I just see the whole escalation as a lack of respect for the hard work behind the scene that made this happen

You've worked hard on this, it was appreciated just that some who reacted was an outsider so maybe they find it unfair the votings and it wasn't your fault.

No one was an outsider. They all had the same shares on media, the same starting points and the same attention from the voters and judges. Everything else is a crap mentality and the idea that you wrote an article (same as other 23 people) and you deserve to be the winner. I invite them all to participate in the official P0x writing competitions and compete against 50-100 entries ( including myself) and see how they rate while playing in the "big boys league"

I mean did you open the votings in public as well not just inside the club? That's what I am referring to, maybe they were thinking the votings was collaboration with friends something like that.

No. It was a quality check not a popularity contest.

This.

And it's a money grab by the person who complained the loudest. He got quite some tips on his comments that misconstrue the contest rules. And he won't even answer any question where he read that

the task was to explain Bityard. The listed cryptocurrency would be a side issue.

I asked him 3 times already and his only answer is that he doesn't want to deal with me anymore.

Well .... this can add up to the story of the first and last written competition ...

Look, he changed the content, now it states different things, and this he calls transparent. That is intransparent and fishy, I regret participating in this.

Never mind, my friend, do not deal with these. Waste of time.

Every experience is a gain Felix and if my word means something... it's nothing fishy! As you can see from the votes up there ... quality was considered.

Do not get me wrong ... but the voting was made by some of the best content creators on ReadCash and noise cash and WILL BE 12.50% from the combined judge voting and Bityard. No point to get offensive towards the people who voted as this is all part of the plan. Appreciate the feedback for the articles but still ... we have 3 judges and Bityard rating the articles. For your future writing competition feel free to judge it as you wish and I promise I will participate 😊

It is not my intention to insult. I just said my idea. I don't think it's a fair vote. Many people who read those articles would think the same as me. The second person describes the phone call he had with his friend at night. Do I need to say anything else? Is this the article chosen by the best? I'm not going to waste my time with an essay contest again. I don't want to prolong the discussion. I have the freedom to speak my mind and I have said it. Thanks...

Its a different approache and as I said ... being different is a bonus. If I want to know 100% valid information about Bityard ... will read it on Bityard.
If the vote of 60 people plus the decision of 3 judges and the opinion of Bityard's Marketing Manager is not making a fair process than I would listen you your definition of fairness. Spent enough time planning and organising this competition FOR THE COMMUNITY to participate in this pointless discussion. Bityard was happy with the voting system and at the end of the day ... they pay the money.

I have no objection to it being different. I object to the fact that it is different but insufficient. If Bityard is happy, if Club1BCH is happy, good luck. There is no way for us to be happy in a place where the giver of money provides justice. Wild capitalism is ubiquitous. So everyone goes their own way. Good day to you, lots of sun...

Which article of mine did you read? This is my entry into the contest: https://read.cash/@MoreGainStrategies/bityard-is-bullish-and-so-am-i-my-bull-case-for-bitcoin-cash-a20d73d7

Yes, you talked a little bit about Bityard in the last part of the article. But admit it mate, you wrote most of the article on Bitcoin Cash.

Yes, that was the task. To write about a crypto that is listed on Bityard and that I believe will turn bullish in Q4. The task was not to write a user guide for Bityard.

I mentioned that BCH can be bought on spot and as a future on Bityard. And I suggested to add a direct fiat onramp - which is currently missing on Bityard. I also mentioned that you can withdraw the BCH that was bought on spot.

Here are the rules and instructions for the contest: https://read.cash/@PVMihalache/club1bch-presents-the-bityard-writing-competition-4cc5322f

I think you should re-read the contest terms because the task was to explain Bityard. The listed cryptocurrency would be a side issue. Whoever deserves wins. I do not accept that this vote affects the decision. I don't care about winning. The competition should just be fair.

PVMihalache published a sample article after the competition ended. I recommend you read it. https://www.publish0x.com/mind-puzzle/trading-platforms-street-fighter-bityard-is-beating-the-comp-xnqejdp

I re-read the contest rules and it says "The article must be a mix of Bityard drive towards innovation and a coin that is available on Bityard that you think will be bullish in Quarter 4 of 2021. Be different ... be unique!"

Where did you read that

the task was to explain Bityard. The listed cryptocurrency would be a side issue.

I haven't even seen that there is a sample article, but the rules literally say" be different... Be unique!" I highly doubt that a rewrite of a sample article is what was intended by these instructions.

Do you really have a hard time understanding what you're reading? Sample article published after the contest is over. Not before the competition starts. It was an example of how it should be. It was an example that should give important information about Bityard. There was innovation, of course, but it wouldn't just be innovation. So, why was a sample article published after the competition ended? Thus, this sample article could give the community an idea of what to consider when voting. For voters to read and understand. The biggest problem of our age is that people are lazy about reading and of course have a hard time understanding what they read. Don't you think so?

Yes, some people seem to have a problem understanding what they read. You probably read my question, but you didn't answer it. Right?

Here it is again:

I re-read the contest rules and it says "The article must be a mix of Bityard drive towards innovation and a coin that is available on Bityard that you think will be bullish in Quarter 4 of 2021. Be different ... be unique!"

Where did you read that

the task was to explain Bityard. The listed cryptocurrency would be a side issue.

I didn't even click on the sample article, because I'm currently busy with something else.

PS: You edited your previous post and I doubt it used to say that the sample article was published after the competition ended when I read it.

"Note: You edited your previous post and when I read it I doubt it said the sample article was published after the contest ended." This note is enough to tell what kind of person you are. First of all, I didn't change my post. It doesn't matter though. The important thing is that the man publishes the sample article after the contest is over. So, the man's time to publish the sample article is key. It's a simple fact. Why would I argue with someone who doesn't even understand this? I no longer deal with you. Go your way.

First of all, I didn't change my post.

This is a lie. You edited your comment - which is indicated by the star next to the publishing time. Everybody can verify that fact. I don't know what you edited, but it is an undisputable thing that you edited that comment.

And if someone else is reading this: ErdoV has still not answered the question about where he read that

the task was to explain Bityard. The listed cryptocurrency would be a side issue.

I wonder that the content has changed overnight and that you are not the top entry anymore, any explanation, and does this seem transparent to you?

Do you mean the article changed? I didn't notice that, because I didn't check it right away. But someone send the screenshot of ErdoV claiming my article was bad and didn't follow the instructions in the group where people voted. Maybe some people changed their vote based on that influence. I don't know?

I think I successfully refuted ErdoV's arguments. He is not even replying to me anymore.

And ErdoV also changed his comment between now and when I first replied to him, but he still claims I talk about myself in the article - when I clearly explain the mission of Bitcoin Cash.

I'm not sure what ErdoV's problem is. He said he wrote a good article. I read it and found several flaws. He didn't respond to that comment of mine, either.

Look at the content again, the results have changed over night. Is this transparent to you?

Who change their article?

Paul changed it overnight, yesterday Martin was on top of the votings.

There were 3 rounds of voting Felix and each time some articles didn't made the cut. I don't see any issues with that as the last 9 are some of the best. I have partial results and this vote only changed the 9th article to go up one spot. Don't see the point of all the negativity as 99% of competitions will drop the results without any updates and explanations and no one complains. Maybe that was the solution

The voting really changed, as he made final round. That is why.. as for the voting results, hmm no comments on it 🤦

I read the articles the moment they where published and made my notes so changing the content makes the difference. Then the other judges done a similar thing so changing anything in the articles over the last days would not make a difference

He was referring to what you posted yesterday here, its changed today.. not the content of whatsoever article it is..

Everyone had the same chances and the same attention and trust me whebbI qm saying that this vote made no difference in the top 5

I highly doubt if this was fair... everyone obviously took sides. Well it's your game, it's your choice..

The maximum points an article can get is 100 .... from the community vote an top article got 10 points.... see my point

But you already hit the nail on the head with your article, nobody will ever take it as this...

I highly doubt if anyone is ever going to be interested in this game again... good luck though, I'm out the people left should be the one to wrestle this out not me..

You weren't left out ans this is not even the result... don't get it why some are getting so upset. If It was anything shady what was the point of publishing? I put effort alone into this competition be brought to ReadCash and to have such a big reward pool! Looks like it was a mistake and in the future I will direct my networking to other places

I never doubted you for once, I commend your efforts towards this.. you hold your standards as well..

Who ever gets the reward is okay by me, but seeing the way the message was passed caused the confusion.. weldone

No worries... not getting an issue with the feedback. I know that if an article will be outstanding will be picked up by Bityard and the 3 judges... Time to wait for the official results 😌

The pic of the poll has been changed after all these comments as it shows not MoreGainStrategie as the top entry anymore.

For real, I actually just observed... what sort of sorcery are they playing with. 😄

I'm just going to lay low for now... really exchanging words wouldn't solve anything.

It is how it is, this is not transparency at all. It is fishy and has a bad taste. I already regret participating in this competition from the club for the club. However, let's just move on and not look behind ;)