read.cash is a platform where you could earn money (total earned by users so far: $ 778,789.04).
You could get tips for writing articles and comments, which are paid in Bitcoin Cash (BCH) cryptocurrency,
which can be spent on the Internet or converted to your local money.
According to Japanese folklore, earthquakes are caused by a giant catfish, Namazu, in the interior of the earth. When he approaches the surface and wriggles and whips his tail, the result is an earthquake. Only the god Kashima can stop him and force him back to the earth's interior. When Kashima is tired or inattentive, Namazu starts to move and makes the earth quake.
In the late 1700s, Namazu began to be associated with disasters. Prior to that, he was a water deity, primarily associated with floods and heavy rain. He warned of those and stopped them by eating water dragons that caused them. During the 1700s, he gradually came to be regarded as the cause of them instead, and replaced the water dragon as the cause of various problems. After the great earthquake in Edo [now Tokyo] in 1855, Namazu increasingly came to be seen as a divine punishment for human error. In this way he was yonaoshi daimyojin, "The god of world improvement". They thought the purpose of his rampage was to improve human morals, not least to make people generous about worldly goods.
Within ukiyo-e, pictures showing Namazu were called namazu-e.
A namazu-e representing the great earthquake of Edo in October 1851. (Artist unknown) A namazu-e representing the great earthquake of Edo in October 1851. (Artist unknown) The god Kashima controls Namazu – ca 1855The god Kashima controls Namazu – ca 1855Kuniyoshi: Otsu-e with Namazu, 1850s.Kuniyoshi: Otsu-e with Namazu, 1850s.
Namazu-e were typically Otsu-e. That means “picture from Otsu” and refers to the place where this sort of pictures was initially sold. They were simple drawings or woodblock prints with some manually added colour, often made by the artists while the customer was waiting. Probably the initial purpose of the otsu-e was to serve as an alternative to more expensive little Buddha statues. A picture with a religious function rather than an aesthetic. It later came to include beings from Japanese folklore and even totally secular motives.
An Otsu-e was typically unsigned. Of the namazu-e showed here, the one above is made by Utagawa Kuniyoshi, the others are anonymous.
The tradition of otsu-e is still alive, or has been revived if you so prefer. In any case it was not limited to ukiyo-e or the Edo period.
The god Kashima immobilizes a guilty NamazuThe god Kashima immobilizes a guilty NamazuYonaoshi Daimyojin perpetuating a traditional suicideYonaoshi Daimyojin perpetuating a traditional suicide
In nature, catfish are very interesting fish which can grow very big. They have no scales, can breathe and “taste” through the skin and have a developed ability to communicate by sound. As food, catfish is rich in vitamin D, but its fat is not good, since it contains more omega-6 than omega-3 fatty acids.
Catfish, Ictalurus punctatus (Image released to Public Domain by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)Catfish, Ictalurus punctatus (Image released to Public Domain by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)
I saw you had taken this to your community (Short) Stories / Tales (c00f). I don't know if you have been looking through my Japanese articles, but I could imagine that then you would also like the story about Sagi Musume, The Heron Maiden.
https://read.cash/@Mictorrani/sagi-musume-the-heron-maiden-0884e080
Their folklore always has that sort of explanations to things. Yet, that is not unique for Japan, that is in the nature of folklore, even if it is very expressive in Japan. Perhaps folklore is more alive in parts of East Asia, however, because their religions have never tried to suppress older traditions. Things are added rather than replaced. (Not true where Communism took dominance. It has been a catastrophe for the culture in, for instance, China.)
That's right. But in China's case communism waasn't able to destroy all the chinese folklore. They still have many stories to tell, and they are as interesting as japanese stories.
Yes, because all Chinese did not live in Communist China. They had to go to Taiwan to re-find their culture, it survived there and among millions of expat Chinese. Mainland China is still a shadow of what it could have been culturally. Basically, they genuine Chinese traditions are gone there. Many people don't even know they are gone, they don't know they have existed! Mao's cultural revolution made that. It was the most gigantic cultural suicide in history.
Mao's cultural revolution was a two edge weapon. China improved a lot and become one of the strongest nations in the world, but in return most of their culture and folklore is gone. I don't think you should scrifice your culture to improve 'Japan as an example) but that's what happened in china.
No, Mao did not improve much in China. The development came after, when Dengxiaoping changed the communism not to be communism anymore, apart from the name.
Hardly now anymore. They get some back from Taiwan and so, but the brainwashing in China was enormous, most young people have no idea about even looking for it and it is now so long ago since Mao's time, so old people today were very young then, and very indoctrinated that they had to get rid of the old culture. They even burned all old books, so nothing should remain of China before Mao. It was the most systematic destruction of a culture in human history. Thank God for the large communities of Chinese outside mainland China, who could preserve large parts of the Chinese culture, the culture of what was then a third of humanity!
I think I received 20 points, but I didn't check right then so I'm not sure. The strange thing is that it should not have been possible for you to come into the page outside the community, since the front page leads to the community version (which you can see on that the community is written there with blue). That's where something went wrong.
I have had email contact with read.cash, I understand what the problem is now. It's not all that easy to solve. The problem is that the notifications going out are leading to the article outside the community system. So when you click on the notification, you come to the article, but not inside the community. Every article doesn't even have a community at that moment, but is approved later. Not mine, since I am the moderator.I just post it that way direct and don't need any approval, but otherwise there is a time in between posting and when the article gets its first approval to a community. And the notifications are going out the moment the article is posted. Something has to be changed there.
They discussed alternative solutions, but it was a private email, I don't want to discuss that here. When they want to announce more facts publicly, they'll do that. But I'm sure they are working on it.
Here is what they said, I quote the email (with their permission, see above).
One thing we definitely missed is that all of your subscribers are getting the link
to your "article", not to communities post. The thing is that lets imagine that you
are not the moderator. So you write an article, even asking it to be in a community
and publish it. We now have to send out a link. But where? The link in community
isn't approved yet and might not even be approved at all..
Maybe we should redirect all users to community post once the first approval is
there... or we need to delay sending a notification until there's an approval. I'm
not sure yet which is better.
I don't know if this looks good or not but they can try and send two notifications: the first one when the writer publish it as normal. And another one when that article is approved for the first time by a moderator.
It's not good, then a lot of people will open and look and rate without the author gets anything for it.The most reasonable, in my opinion, is that they don't send the notification until the first approval in a community. A consequence of that would be that something being published without being submitted to a community, will not generate any notification at all.
Hold the marker over the value of your wallet, top of page, you'll see the number of points you have. Note how many they are before you make a comment. Then check afterwards if you have got more or not. Is it clear enough?
Clear is, you get no points here. You must enter the article through community. Look at my post from today, I mention something in the end there. And this is the link to the community version, so there you'll get points. https://read.cash/@Mictorrani/the-toyokuni-confusion-acb8d47b
Okay the marker will be my finger. I am a mobile user only.
Through which community should one comment? The very first or one of the communities you joined with this article. I don't believe I will check this all out each time but I learned something. Thanks. 👍💕
To get points for your comments, any community goes. But for the author thumbs up and views become divided. You know you get points after a certain number of views or thumbs up, but they are counted for each community separately. It would be better if every viewer came to the same community, but that is impossible to achieve. So just any community is fine for you.
For my articles, the ones in the near future I mean, just follow the link I give at the bottom of the page. You'll see how that looks in my posts from today. Then you come to a suitable community direct.
That problem will soon disappear, since each article may only be in one community in the future.
Notifications are always troublesome, because they are mixed and when having many communities to moderate, they are many, many. I'm sure I miss some notifications. But it must be even worse with only a telephone.
If you can only see that old ones, something must be wrong.
No i didn't. And this happened in many other articles with me. They are in communities but no points. I emailed read.cash and they told me to send a link of that comment to them. And I send them my comment in here
From my point of view every comment under an article that has joined a community should get points. Otherwise it is confusing. I've seen the same article twice in the list, once with community mark and once without. If I comment the article without marking, I don't get any points. I am never really sure if my comment will get points.
That would require that you will be able to submit article only to one community. Otherwise, there are discussions going in many communities, some of which might block some users (in future), some of these communities might get points, some not (because of too lax rules). We're not yet quite sure yet what the best solution is, but we're thinking about it.
No it doesn't make sense at all. If you clicked on the front page it should lead to community version. I have written to them now. I'm quite irritated over this sort of thing.
We've rolled out a temporary solution to the comments problem (look under "Comments" headline).
Since @hamedmkh originally started this discussion in non-community article, so we've had to move this whole branch to a non-community discussion (but the points were kept).
I think it's more obvious now. Does it seem better now to you?
We're still thinking about the problem of how to send notifications, etc...
Ok, I understand. But as long as notifications lead to article outside communities, it is best not to post anything new then. Or am I misunderstanding something?
The notifications about replies/comments go out correctly. If I reply to you in community discussion the notification will be to that community discussion tab.
There is only a (logical) problem with notifications about when article is first published. Namely - we either need to send out notifications to subscribers immediately about an article being published, or we need to delay them until(or if) an article is published in some community. That problem is still not solved.
Yes, I understand that. It was the notification of a new article I was thinking of now, because subscribers follow that and then they open the non-community version and both comments and upvotes occur there.
It's not easy, but I think the best, or least bad, alternative would be to delay notification until the article's first approval into a community. That would mean that articles never entering any community would not generate any notification, and I'm sure some members would protest against that, but shouldn't all serious articles end up in a community anyway?
but shouldn't all serious articles end up in a community anyway?
I'm not so sure about that. Of course articles end up in communities, but there's a big difference between an author submitting an article to a community and somebody submitting an article just to get some points by commenting on it.
Yes, okay, I understand. You have to consider all consequences of what you do and you have full insight into the system; I can only speak from what I observe and that might lead wrong in the end.
Yeah, it's not easy sometimes, because we're trying to invent something new and the real usage is often totally different from what we imagine it to be.
One more thing, when opening an article, it is impossible to see if it is opened in a community or outside. That need to be clearly visible. When I open something in the feed, I don't know if it is inside or outside the community. I have discovered that even if it is community marked (with blue), it sometimes looks to be outside the community when opened. It was like that with my article yesterday, as I could figure it out with help of the comments.
This story is really good and the arts are great as usual. I'm just curious, why catfish? Catfish also don't live in the ocean (correct me if I'm wrong please). Why not shark or whale? Haha. Anyway, I'm really learning a lot on your articles. Thank you.
Namazu deserves a life too! How sad not even wiggling your tale is allowed. I loved this story.
I believe there was an animation: Shark and Catfish.
👍💕
I wish we could see all comments @read.cash this is getting messy.