When talking about the quality of writing, maybe we don't hesitate to judge it with two choices, namely bad or good writing. However, we should not forget that the nature of the quality of writing is relative, depending on what standards are used in an assessment.
Every writer cannot deny that they have their own standards to judge writing. One of them is by comparing one article to another. Good comparisons between own works and those of others.
And there are times when we also have to pay attention to the importance of saving an article. We know a great writer who produced several books, for sure he has gone through a very long forging process. Writing is blasphemed, criticized here and there, and others. But whatever it is is the pleasure of being a writer.
Those great writers have gone through writings that could be said to be bad. If we examine a little that the bad writing we have ever written has great benefits that we do not realize. From bad writing that has been written, we can learn, analyze writing errors, both in terms of ideas, choosing diction, good and correct language, then make continuous improvements. Until the writing deserves to be considered good. Then ready to be eaten by the reader.
The hope is, by saving bad writing, we can perpetuate the history that we have made and write ourselves. At least there is evidence that we have written. There is physical evidence. Not just words later.
Keep up the spirit and keep writing friends....